Long‐term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting in severely atrophic maxilla: A 10‐year prospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 1528-1535
Author(s):  
Jun‐Yu Shi ◽  
Shu‐Jiao Qian ◽  
Ying‐Xin Gu ◽  
Shi‐Chong Qiao ◽  
Maurizio S. Tonetti ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1392-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi-si Si ◽  
Yi-wen Shou ◽  
Yi-tian Shi ◽  
Guo-li Yang ◽  
Hui-ming Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Yu ◽  
Qiming Jiang ◽  
Zhengchuan Zhang ◽  
Xiaolin Yu ◽  
Feilong Deng

Abstract Background This study analyzed the influence of implant protrusion length (IPL) on the possible factors that affect the long-term outcomes utilizing non-grafting osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) with simultaneous implant placement, and to explore the optimal range of IPL. Materials and methods A retrospective study design was adopted. The clinical and radiographic data of 105 implants in 65 patients were collected after 3–9 (mean 5.04) years follow-up. IPL was divided into three groups (group1, IPL<2mm; group2, 2mm≤IPL<4mm; group3, IPL≥4mm). Endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), bone to implant contact length (BICL), and percentage of ESBG (%ESBG) were used to evaluate non-grafting OSFE. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess the cumulative survival rate. Multiple linear regression model was used to explore the relationship between the possible influence factors and ESBG. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to explore the correlation of IPL with ESBG, MBL, BICL, and %ESBG. Results A total of 102 implants in 62 patients fulfilled the survival criteria, giving the cumulative survival rates of 96.4% and 94.1% for implant-based analysis and patient-based analysis, respectively. The mean ESBG, MBL, and BICL at the latest follow-up were 1.95±0.88 mm, 0.58±0.68 mm, and 5.51±1.47 mm. ESBG was found to be positively correlated to IPL. A significant decreased bone formation efficiency was found when IPL was over 4 mm (P=0.02). Conclusions An optimal range of IPL within 4 mm was recommended for better long-term outcomes when applying non-grafting OSFE with simultaneous implant placement.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1023-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabah Nedir ◽  
Nathalie Nurdin ◽  
Lydia Vazquez ◽  
Serge Szmukler-Moncler ◽  
Mark Bischof ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabah Nedir ◽  
Nathalie Nurdin ◽  
Paul Khoury ◽  
Marc El Hage ◽  
Semaan Abi Najm ◽  
...  

When the posterior maxilla is atrophic, the reference standard of care would be to perform sinus augmentation with an autologous bone graft through the lateral approach and delayed implant placement. However, placement of short implants with the osteotome sinus floor elevation technique and without graft can be proposed for an efficient treatment of clinical cases with a maxillary residual bone height of 4 to 8 mm. The use of grafting material is recommended only when the residual bone height is ≤4 mm. Indications of the lateral sinus floor elevation are limited to cases with a residual bone height ≤ 2 mm and fused corticals, uncompleted healing of the edentulous site, and absence of flat cortical bone crest or when the patient wishes to wear a removable prosthesis during the healing period. The presented case report illustrates osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting and simultaneous implant placement in extreme conditions: atrophic maxilla, short implant placement, reduced healing time, and single crown rehabilitation. After 6 years, all placed implants were functional with an endosinus bone gain.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Xin Gu ◽  
Jun-Yu Shi ◽  
Long-Fei Zhuang ◽  
Shu-Jiao Qian ◽  
Jia-Ji Mo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document