Clinical effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in the management of peri‐implant diseases: A randomized clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Pulcini ◽  
Juan Bollaín ◽  
Ignacio Sanz‐Sánchez ◽  
Elena Figuero ◽  
Bettina Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Cetylpyridinium Chloride ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Mouth Rinse

Efficacy of a new mouth rinse formulation based on 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a 6-month randomized clinical trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1007-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Costa ◽  
Estefanía Laguna ◽  
David Herrera ◽  
Jorge Serrano ◽  
Bettina Alonso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Cetylpyridinium Chloride ◽  
Mouth Rinse

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF MOUTH RINSE FORMULATION BASED ON CETYLPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE 0.1% IN THE CONTROL OF DENTAL CALCULUS BUILDUP

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diah Ayu Maharani ◽  
Alia Ramadhani ◽  
Melissa Adiatman ◽  
Yuniardini Septorini Wimardhani ◽  
Linda Kusdhany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cetylpyridinium Chloride ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Mouth Rinse ◽  
Dental Calculus ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objective: This study aimed at comparing the antiplaque, anticalculus, and antigingivitis potentials of a mouth rinse containing essential oil, alcohol,zinc, and fluoride with a mouth rinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) 0.1% over 1-, 2-, and 3-month periods.Methods: This study was a double-blind, parallel randomized clinical trial with a 3-day run-in phase. Respondents were asked to gargle twice dailywith 15 ml of mouth rinse for 30 seconds after brushing teeth. Respondents were 80 females with a mean age of 21 years, and a single dental examinerwas employed throughout the study to decrease the variance. Prophylaxis was performed for all respondents before the intervention. Three mouthrinses were tested: Group 1 with the mouth rinse containing CPC 0.1%, Group 2 as the negative control, and Group 3 as the positive control with amouth rinse containing alcohol. Evaluations were conducted by plaque index, gingival index, calculus index, and CariScreen examinations.Results: The clinical trial showed that the mouth rinse with alcohol and the mouth rinse containing CPC 0.1% were effective in inhibiting bacterialbuildup (antiplaque) and have anticalculus properties, but with no statistically significant antigingivitis effect.Conclusion: It was found that the mouth rinse containing alcohol has similar effectiveness with CPC 0.1% mouth rinse, but side effects, such as aburning sensation, were reported in the alcohol-containing mouth rinse.

Clinical Effects of a Pectin‐Containing Oligomeric Formula in Tube Feeding Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio Maruyama ◽  
Satoshi Goshi ◽  
Yasushige Kashima ◽  
Akihiro Mizuhara ◽  
Takashi Higashiguchi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Tube Feeding ◽  
Clinical Effects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document