Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap-involving approach: a randomized controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 1171-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Stoupel ◽  
Chun-Teh Lee ◽  
Jaclyn Glick ◽  
Elena Sanz-Miralles ◽  
Cody Chiuzan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Aesthetic

scholarly journals Fully‐guided versus conventional implant placement by dental students. A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (S20) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Kasper Søndergaard ◽  
Rubens Spin‐Neto ◽  
Mandana Hosseini ◽  
Simon Storgaard Jensen ◽  
Klaus Gotfredsen
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals On the Ten-Year Success in the Application of Partial Extraction Therapy: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1435-1443
Author(s):  
Mohammed M. Al Moaleem
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Replacement ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Extraction Therapy ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Report Data ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Esthetic Dentistry ◽  
Partial Extraction

Hürzeler presented the socket-shield technique (SST) more than 10 years ago. The partial extraction therapy (PET), a collective concept of utilizing the patient’s own tooth root to preserve the periodontium and peri-implant tissue, has been remarkably developed. PET comprises a group of novel techniques for post-extraction implant placement. Several modifications of PET and simultaneous implant placement have been presented since its inception. Since its origin, several alterations have been employed in the methodology of partial extraction of the root and the simultaneous implant placement. A repeatable, predictable protocol is needed to provide tooth replacement in esthetic dentistry. Moreover, a standardized procedure provides a good framework for clinicians to report data relating to the technique with procedural consistency. This review aims to illustrate a reproducible and systematic protocol for the PET techniques with immediate implant placement at the aesthetic zone. The most used technique is the socket-shield technique, which is potentially offers promising results, minimizing the necessity for invasive bone grafts round implants in the aesthetic area, clinical data to support this is very inadequate. The limited research data existing is cooperated by a deficiency of well-designed prospective randomized controlled investigations. The present case studies and techniques are of actual incomplete technical value. Retrospective studies published in limited records but are of inconsistent plan. At this point, it is indistinct whether the socket-shield technique will offer a stable long-time outcome or not

Cosmetic Outcome of Wound Closure between Steri-Strips (3M™ Steri-Strip) and Simple Interrupted Nylon 6-0 Sutures in Out-Patient Cervical Lymph Node Excision: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (7) ◽  
pp. 1088-1094
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Cervical Lymph Node ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nylon 6 ◽  
Lymph Node Excision ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Aesthetic

Objective: To compare the aesthetic outcome of cervical lymph node excision skin closure between Steri-Strips closure and simple interrupted sutures using Nylon 6-0. Materials and Methods: The present study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial of forty patients with cervical lymph node excision. They were randomized into two groups of twenty. The first group was allocated to close the skin by simple interrupted sutures with Nylon 6-0, the other group received the Steri-Strips for skin closure. Complications were observed at the first and second week. The aesthetic outcomes for skin closure were evaluated at 12 weeks postoperatively using the predetermined Sakka’s cosmetic assessment criteria and scoring system. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, length of surgical wound, and pathology. The Steri-Strips group showed significantly lower Sakka’s aesthetic score compared to the 6-0 Nylon sutures group (6.25±0.85 and 7.75 ±1.33, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in aesthetic outcomes between genders. Moreover, the operative time of the Steri-Strips group was significantly less than that of the 6-0 Nylon sutures group (2.2±0.41 and 4.75±0.44 minutes, p<0.001). Conclusion: Skin closure with Steri-Strips gave better aesthetic outcomes compared to the 6-0 Nylon sutures (p<0.001). However, the aesthetic outcomes were assessed by physicians, so the patients’satisfaction could not be assessed. Keywords: Lymph node biopsy; Hypertrophic scar; Keloid; Cosmetic outcome; Steri-strip

Feasibility of immediate placement of single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 773-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten W. Slagter ◽  
Henny J.A. Meijer ◽  
Nicolaas A. Bakker ◽  
Arjan Vissink ◽  
Gerry M. Raghoebar
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
The Aesthetic

Immediate Single-Tooth Implant Placement in Bony Defects in the Esthetic Zone: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 619-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten W. Slagter ◽  
Henny J.A. Meijer ◽  
Nicolaas A. Bakker ◽  
Arjan Vissink ◽  
Gerry M. Raghoebar
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Single Tooth Implant
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document