scholarly journals Impact on renal resistive index of diabetes in renal transplant donors and recipients: A retrospective analysis of 1827 kidney transplant recipients

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 382-389
Author(s):  
Jean‐Baptiste Freminville ◽  
Louis‐Marie Vernier ◽  
Jérome Roumy ◽  
Frédéric Patat ◽  
Philippe Gatault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Resistive Index ◽  
Renal Resistive Index ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

scholarly journals CD56+CD57+ infiltrates as the most predominant subset of intragraft natural killer cells in renal transplant biopsies with antibody-mediated rejection

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hey Rim Jung ◽  
Mi Joung Kim ◽  
Yu-Mee Wee ◽  
Jee Yeon Kim ◽  
Monica Young Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Natural Killer ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Cell Infiltration ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Antibody Mediated Rejection

Abstract Little is known about the characteristics and clinical implications of specific subsets of intragraft natural killer (NK) cells in kidney transplant recipients. We analyzed 39 for-cause renal transplant biopsies performed at our center from May 2015 to July 2017. According to histopathologic reports, 8 patients (20.5%) had no rejection (NR), 11 (28.2%) had T cell-mediated rejections (TCMR) only, and 20 (51.3%) had antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). NK cells were defined as CD3–CD56+ lymphocytes that are positive for CD57, CD49b, NKG2A, or KIR. The density of NK cells was significantly higher in the ABMR group (2.57 ± 2.58/mm2) than in the NR (0.12 ± 0.22/mm2) or the TCMR (0.25 ± 0.34/mm2) group (P = 0.002). Notably, CD56+CD57+ infiltrates (2.16 ± 1.89) were the most frequently observed compared with CD56+CD49b+ (0.05 ± 0.13), CD56+NKG2A+ (0.21 ± 0.69), and CD56+KIR+ (0.15 ± 0.42) cells in the ABMR group (P < 0.001). Death-censored graft failure was significantly higher in patients with NK cell infiltration than those without (Log-rank test, P = 0.025). In conclusion, CD56+CD57+ infiltrates are a major subset of NK cells in kidney transplant recipients with ABMR and NK cell infiltration is significantly associated with graft failure post-transplant.

scholarly journals COVID-19 in Renal Transplant Recipients: Case Series and a Brief Review of Current Evidence

Nephron ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Muhammed Ahmed Elhadedy ◽  
Yazin Marie ◽  
Ahmed Halawa
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Therapy Monitoring ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Intensive Care Treatment ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Supportive Treatment ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

By April 26, 2020, infections related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected people from 210 countries and caused 203,818 reported deaths worldwide. A few studies discussed the outcome of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. This short series demonstrates our experience in managing COVID-19 disease in renal transplant patients in the absence of strong evidence. We report 8 cases of kidney transplant recipients infected with COVID-19 (median age = 48.5 years; range = 21–71 years), including 4 males and 4 females. The most frequently associated comorbidity was hypertension. The most common presenting features were fever and cough. The main radiological investigation was a portable chest X-ray. Other common features included lymphopenia, high C-reactive protein, and a very high ferritin level. Overall, 1 patient was managed as an outpatient, the remaining 7 required hospital admission, 1 of them referred to the intensive therapy unit. Management included supportive treatment (intravenous fluid therapy, monitoring renal function, and symptomatic treatment with or without ward-based oxygen therapy depending on oxygen saturation) and discontinuation of the antiproliferative immunosuppressive drugs. Seven patients recovered and discharged home to self-isolate. One patient required intensive care treatment and mechanical ventilation. Supportive treatment could be sufficient for the management or to be tried first. We also found that short hospital stay with self-isolation on discharge reduces the burden on the health service and protect the staff and the public.

The association between renal resistive index and premature mortality after kidney transplantation is modified by pre-transplant diabetes status: a cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1577-1584
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste de Freminville ◽  
Louis-Marie Vernier ◽  
Jérome Roumy ◽  
Frédéric Patat ◽  
Philippe Gatault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Resistive Index ◽  
Renal Resistive Index ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Diabetes Status

Abstract Background Renal resistive index (RI) predicts mortality in renal transplant recipients, but we do not know whether this is true in diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to analyse the long-term predictive value of RI for death with a functioning graft (DWFG) in renal transplant recipients with or without pre-transplant diabetes. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in 1800 renal transplant recipients between 1985 and 2017 who were followed for up to 30 years (total observation period: 14 202 patient years). Donor and recipient characteristics at time of transplantation and at 3 months were reviewed. The long-term predictive value of RI for DWFG and the age–RI and arterial pressure–RI relationships were assessed. Results A total of 284/1800 (15.7%) patients had diabetes mellitus before transplantation. RI was &lt;0.75 in 1327/1800 patients (73.7%). High RI was associated with a higher risk of DWFG in non-diabetic patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.39, 95% confidence interval 2.50–4.61; P &lt; 0.001], but not in patients with pre-transplant diabetes (HR = 1.25, 0.70–2.19; P = 0.39), even after multiple adjustments. There was no interaction between diabetes and age. In contrast, there was an interaction between RI and pulse pressure. Conclusion Our study indicates that RI is not a predictor of DWFG in diabetic renal transplant recipients, in contrast to non-diabetic recipients. These findings could be due to a different age–RI or pulse pressure–RI relationship.

Correlation between clinical outcome and tissue inflammatory response in kidney transplant recipients with cryptococcosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela S Nishikaku ◽  
Marcel V Soldá ◽  
Giannina Ricci ◽  
Vinicius Ponzio ◽  
Carla Pagliari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Granulomatous Inflammation ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Tissue Response ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Tissue Samples

ABSTRACT Cryptococcosis is the second most common invasive fungal infection reported in renal transplant recipients. Tissue granulomatous inflammation is necessary to contain Cryptococcus infection. This study aims to analyze the granuloma patterns and in situ expression of regulatory T (Treg) immune response in tissue samples from 12 renal transplant recipients with cryptococcosis. Fungal isolates were molecularly identified as Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. A detailed characterization of granulomas in tissue samples from 12 kidney transplant recipients with cryptococcosis was described by checking six lung and six skin biopsies by conventional histology and for immunohistochemical detection of CD4 and Treg markers: forkhead box P3 (FoxP3), interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming-growth factor (TGF)-β. Granulomas were classified as compact, loose or mixed. Patients with mixed (n = 4) and compact (n = 3) granulomatous inflammation patterns were associated with a better prognosis and presented a higher number of CD4+FoxP3+T cells compared to the group of patients with loose granulomas. In counterpart, three out of five patients with loose granulomas died with cryptococcosis. We suggest that Treg may have a protective role in the tissue response to Cryptococcus infection given its association with compact and mixed granulomas in patients with better clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin for the Treatment of New-Onset Diabetes after Renal Transplantation

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Boerner ◽  
Clifford D. Miles ◽  
Vijay Shivaswamy
Keyword(s):  
Renal Transplantation ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Hemoglobin A1c ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
First Line ◽  
New Onset

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a common comorbidity after renal transplantation. Though metformin is the first-line agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, in renal transplant recipients, metformin is frequently avoided due to concerns about renal dysfunction and risk for lactic acidosis. Therefore, alternative first-line agents for the treatment of NODAT in renal transplant recipients are needed. Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, has a low incidence of hypoglycemia, is weight neutral, and, in a small study, did not affect immunosuppressant levels. However, long-term sitagliptin use for the treatment of NODAT in kidney transplant recipients has not been studied. We retrospectively analyzed renal transplant recipients diagnosed with NODAT and treated with sitagliptin to assess safety and efficacy. Twenty-two patients were started on sitagliptin alone. After 12 months of followup, 19/22 patients remained on sitagliptin alone with a significant improvement in hemoglobin A1c. Renal function and immunosuppressant levels remained stable. Analysis of long-term followup (32.5±17.8 months) revealed that 17/22 patients remained on sitagliptin (mean hemoglobin A1c < 7%) with 9/17 patients remaining on sitagliptin alone. Transplant-specific adverse events were rare. Sitagliptin appears safe and efficacious for the treatment of NODAT in kidney transplant recipients.

scholarly journals Sclerostin is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in kidney transplant recipients

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1177-1183
Author(s):  
Shufei Zeng ◽  
Torsten Slowinski ◽  
Wolfgang Pommer ◽  
Ahmed A. Hasan ◽  
Mohamed M. S. Gaballa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Renal Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Sclerostin is a hormone contributing to the bone-vascular wall cross talk and has been implicated in cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We analyzed the relationship between sclerostin and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Methods 600 stable renal transplant recipients (367men, 233 women) were followed for all-cause mortality for 3 years. Blood and urine samples for analysis and clinical data were collected at study entry. We performed Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models considering confounding factors such as age, eGFR, cold ischemia time, HbA1c, phosphate, calcium, and albumin. Optimal cut-off values for the Cox regression model were calculated based on ROC analysis. Results Sixty-five patients died during the observation period. Nonsurvivors (n = 65; sclerostin 57.31 ± 30.28 pmol/L) had higher plasma sclerostin levels than survivors (n = 535; sclerostin 47.52 ± 24.87 pmol/L) (p = 0.0036). Kaplan–Meier curve showed that baseline plasma sclerostin concentrations were associated with all-cause mortality in stable kidney transplant recipients (p = 0.0085, log-rank test). After multiple Cox regression analysis, plasma levels of sclerostin remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.011; 95% CI 1.002–1.020; p = 0.0137). Conclusions Baseline plasma sclerostin is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in patients after kidney transplantation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document