Durability of a right superior pulmonary vein isolation after an inevitably interrupted single short freeze during cryoballoon ablation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Miyazaki ◽  
Kanae Hasegawa ◽  
Yoshito Iesaka
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Superior Pulmonary Vein

Towards a tailored cryo-pulmonary vein isolation. Lessons learned from second-generation cryoballoon ablation

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 420-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Ciconte ◽  
Nicolas Coulombe ◽  
Pedro Brugada ◽  
Carlo de Asmundis ◽  
Gian-Battista Chierchia
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation

scholarly journals Myocardial injury after pulmonary vein isolation: fire versus ice

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A R Morgado Gomes ◽  
N S C Antonio ◽  
S Silva ◽  
M Madeira ◽  
P Sousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
High Sensitivity Troponin ◽  
Ablation Index ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction The cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), either using point-by-point radiofrequency ablation (RF) or single-shot ablation devices, such as cryoballoon ablation (CB). However, achieving permanent transmural lesions is difficult and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is common. Elevation of high-sensitivity Troponin I (hsTnI) may be used as a surrogate marker for transmural lesions. Still, data regarding the comparison of hsTnI increase after PVI with RF or cryo-energy is controversial. Purpose The aim of this study is to compare the magnitude of hsTnI elevation after PVI with CB versus RF using ablation index guidance. Methods Prospective study of 60 patients admitted for first ablation procedure of paroxysmal or persistent AF in a single tertiary Cardiology Department. Thirty patients were submitted to PVI using CB and 30 patients were submitted to RF, using CARTO® mapping system and ablation index guidance. Patients with atrial flutter were excluded. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups, as well as hsTnI before and after the procedure. Results Mean age was 57.9±12.3 years old, 62% of patients were male and 77% had paroxysmal AF. There were no significant differences between groups regarding gender, age, prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, obesity or AF type. There was also no significant difference in electrical cardioversion need during the procedure. HsTnI median value before ablation was 1.90±1.98 ng/dL. Postprocedural hsTnI was significantly higher in CB-group (6562.7±4756.2 ng/dL versus 1564.3±830.7 ng/dL in RF-group; P=0.001). Regarding periprocedural complications, there was only one case of mild pericardial effusion in RF-group associated with postablation hsTnI of 1180.0 ng/dL. Conclusions High-sensitivity Troponin I was significantly elevated after PVI, irrespective of the ablation technique. In CB-group, hsTnI elevation was significantly higher than in RF-group. This disparity may reflect more extensive lesions with cryoablation, without compromising safety. Longterm studies are needed to understand whether this hsTnI elevation is predictive of a lower AF recurrence rate. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4S) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
T. Y. Chichkova ◽  
S. E. Mamchur ◽  
E. A. Khomenko
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Rf Ablation

Aim. To estimate the clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Methods.230 patients (males: 49.6%, mean age 57 (53; 62) with symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy were included in a single-center prospective study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups to undergo either cryoballoon ablation (n = 122) or radiofrequency (RF) (n = 108) ablation. Both groups were comparable in baseline parameters. The follow-up period was 12 months. Clinical outcomes were estimated with the use of a three-stage scale. The rates of cardiovascular rehospitalizations, direct-current cardioversions and repeated ablations during were estimated within the follow-up. The quality of life (QoL) in the cryoablation group was measured using the AFEQT scale.Results.77% (n = 94) of patients in the cryoballoon ablation group and 71.3% (n = 77) of patients in the RF group (р = 0.71) demonstrated reported the optimal clinical effects. Both groups, cryo ablation and RF ablation, had similar rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations (23.8 vs 28.7%, OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.4; р = 0.39), direct-current cardioversions (12.3 vs 17.6%, OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3–1.4; р = 0.26) and repeated ablations (9.8–11.1%, OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4–2.0; р = 0.75). The patients treated with cryoballoon as opposed to RF ablation had significantly more successful usage of “pill-in-pocket” strategy – 14.8 vs 6.5% (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.01–6.2; р = 0.04). Significant improvements of the QoL parameters with strong size effect have been found in the cryoablation group, i.e. global score (GS) increased by 8.9±6.9 (95% CI 6.6–10.1; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001), symptoms (S) – by 8.3±7.9 (95% CI 4.2–8.8; dCohen 1.5; р<0.001), daily activities (DA) – by 10.0±6.9 (95% CI = 6.4–10.6; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001), treatment concerns (TC) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 6.3–9.2; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001) and treatment satisfaction (TS) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 5.4–9.8; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001).Conclusion.The both catheter-based technologies had comparable clinical success. Cryoablation was characterized by improvement in all QoL parameters based on the AFEQT score.

scholarly journals Reconnection Rate and Long-Term Outcome with Adenosine Provocation During Cryoballoon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel M Kaplan ◽  
Sanjay Dandamudi ◽  
Martha Bohn ◽  
Nishant Verma ◽  
Todd T Tomson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Reconnection Rate ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

scholarly journals Procedural and biophysical indicators of durable pulmonary vein isolation during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 424-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Aryana ◽  
Giacomo Mugnai ◽  
Sheldon M. Singh ◽  
Deep K. Pujara ◽  
Carlo de Asmundis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Biophysical Indicators

Vagal impact of cryoballoon ablation during pulmonary vein isolation

2018 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 132-133
Author(s):  
Ting-Yung Chang ◽  
Chin-Yu Lin ◽  
Shih-Ann Chen
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation

scholarly journals Safety of conscious sedation in electroanatomical mapping procedures and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Weinmann ◽  
Regina Heudorfer ◽  
Alexia Lenz ◽  
Deniz Aktolga ◽  
Manuel Rattka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Electroanatomical Mapping ◽  
Transcutaneous Oxygen ◽  
Transcutaneous Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Electrophysiological Procedures ◽  
Procedure Duration

AbstractImmobilization of patients during electrophysiological procedures, to avoid complications by patients’ unexpected bodily motion, is achieved by moderate to deep conscious sedation using benzodiazepines and propofol for sedation and opioids for analgesia. Our aim was to compare respiratory and hemodynamic safety endpoints of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and electroanatomical mapping (EAM) procedures. Included patients underwent either cryoballoon PVI or EAM procedures. Sedation monitoring included non-invasive blood pressure measurements, transcutaneous oxygen saturation (tSpO2) and transcutaneous carbon-dioxide (tpCO2) measurements. We enrolled 125 consecutive patients, 67 patients underwent cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation and 58 patients had an EAM and radiofrequency ablation procedure. Mean procedure duration of EAM procedures was significantly longer (p < 0.001) and propofol doses as well as morphine equivalent doses of administered opioids were significantly higher in EAM patients compared to cryoballoon patients (p < 0.001). Cryoballoon patients display higher tpCO2 levels compared to EAM patients at 30 min (cryoballoon: 51.1 ± 7.0 mmHg vs. EAM: 48.6 ± 6.2 mmHg, p = 0.009) and at 60 min (cryoballoon: 51.4 ± 7.3 mmHg vs. EAM: 48.9 ± 6.6 mmHg, p = 0.07) procedure duration. Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher after 60 min (cryoballoon: 84.7 ± 16.7 mmHg vs. EAM: 76.7 ± 13.3 mmHg, p = 0.017) in cryoballoon PVI compared to EAM procedures. Regarding respiratory and hemodynamic safety endpoints, no significant difference was detected regarding hypercapnia, hypoxia and episodes of hypotension. Despite longer procedure duration and deeper sedation requirement, conscious sedation in EAM procedures appears to be as safe as conscious sedation in cryoballoon ablation procedures regarding hemodynamic and respiratory safety endpoints.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document