scholarly journals Why does catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy fail?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Muser ◽  
Pasquale Santangeli
Keyword(s):  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Premature Ventricular Contractions

scholarly journals Does Catheter ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions remain unsuccessful in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdi Babayiğit ◽  
Andaç Karadeniz ◽  
Kadir Uğur Mert ◽  
Bulent Gorenek
Keyword(s):  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Maximum Dose ◽  
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Premature Ventricular Contractions ◽  
Antiarrhythmic Medication

We have read with great interest the article “Efficacy of Catheter Ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVC) in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC)” by Assis F.R. et. al. PVC ablation in ARVC was previously studied by Aras D. et al and they presented successful results.In this study, we believe that the study should not be considered as unsuccessful since 2 patients showed a decrease in PVC burden by more than 80% and in the other three patients between 45-70%. The demonstration of a decrease in PVC burden with catheter ablation in ARVD patients indicates that a second ablation may increase the success rate and decrease symptoms. The fact that ARVC has a complex substrate and the disease can progress is undoubtedly the most important factor in achieving the desired success with PVC ablation. Epicardial ablation with endocardial ablation has increased the chance of success in this patient group. In addition, given that BCSD ablation and basal heart rate are guaranteed by ICD implantation, we think that administration of the maximum dose of antiarrhythmic medication may create a significant improvement in these patients. And another factor, contact force sensing plays an important role in evaluating the effectiveness of the process. We suggest that with the current treatment modalities, a pharmacoablative combination therapy and re-ablation when necessary would be appropriate for such a complicated disease.

P992Incidence, predictors, and success of ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC): A long-term cohort study from the Nordic ARVC registry

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M K Christiansen ◽  
K Haugaa ◽  
A Svensson ◽  
T Gilljam ◽  
T Madsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Young Age ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Vt Ablation

Abstract Background Catheter ablation may reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) patients. However, little is known about factors predicting need for ablation and various outcomes have been reported. Purpose We sought to investigate predictors and use of VT ablation and to evaluate the post-procedural outcome in ARVC patients. Methods We studied 435 patients from the Nordic ARVC registry including 220 probands with definite ARVC according to the 2010 task force criteria and 215 mutation-carrying relatives identified through cascade screening. Patients were followed until first-time VT ablation, death, heart transplantation, or January 1st 2018. Additionally, patients undergoing VT ablation were further followed from the time of ablation for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. Results Cumulative use of VT ablation was 4% (95% CI 3%-6%) and 11% (95% CI 8%-15%) after 1 and 10 years. All procedures were performed in probands in whom the cumulative use was 8% (95% CI 5%-12%) and 20% (95% CI 15%-26%). In adjusted analyses restricted to probands, only young age predicted need for ablation. In patients undergoing ablation, risk of recurrent arrhythmias was 59% (95% CI 44%-71%) and 74% (95% CI 59%-84%) 1 and 5 years after the procedure. Despite high recurrence rates, the burden of ventricular arrhythmias was reduced after ablation (p=0.0042). Young age, use of several antiarrhythmic drugs and inducibility to VT immediately after ablation were associated with an unfavorable outcome. Conclusions Twenty percent of ARVC probands developed a clinical indication for VT ablation within 10 years after diagnosis whereas mutation-carrying relatives were without such need. Although the burden of ventricular arrhythmias decreased after ablation, risk of recurrence was substantial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document