Direct oral anticoagulants to treat left ventricular thrombus – A systematic review and meta‐analysis: ELECTRAM investigators

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddharth Shah ◽  
Kuldeep Shah ◽  
Mohit K. Turagam ◽  
Abhinav Sharma ◽  
Andrea Natale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study and Meta-Analysis of Existing Data

2020 ◽  
pp. 107424842096764 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Cochran ◽  
Xiaoming Jia ◽  
Jessica Kaczmarek ◽  
Kristen A. Staggers ◽  
Mahmoud Al Rifai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Existing Data

Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) relative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients diagnosed with LVT from 2014-2017. Patient characteristics and outcomes within 12 months of LVT diagnosis were recorded and analyzed. A meta-analysis was also performed by pooling our results with existing data in literature. Results: 14 DOAC and 59 VKA patients were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar except for age. Although more strokes within 12 months occurred in VKA (15%) than in DOAC (0%) patients, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.189). There were no significant differences in outcomes between patients on DOAC and VKA for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (7%, vs 3.4%, p = .477), LVT resolution (86% vs 76%, p = .499) or bleeding (14% vs 14%, p = 1) within 12 months. The meta-analysis included 6 studies (n = 408 for DOACs; n = 1207 for VKA). There were no significant differences between DOACs versus VKAs with respect to odds for unresolved thrombus (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.26,1.41), embolic events (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.90,1.69), embolic events and death (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84,1.45) or bleeding events (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.74,1.72). Conclusions: Our study and meta-analysis suggest similar efficacy and safety of DOACs in the treatment of LVT compared to VKA. These findings underscore the need for a randomized controlled trial.

scholarly journals Warfarin Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Treating Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Dalia ◽  
Shubham Lahan ◽  
Sagar Ranka ◽  
Amandeep Goyal ◽  
Sara Zoubek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Thrombus ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Ventricular Thrombus

Abstract Background: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is not uncommon and pose a risk of systemic embolism, which can be mitigated by adequate anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being used as alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation, but their efficacy and safety profile has been debated. We aim to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin for the treatment of LVT.Methodology: We systematically searched PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and LILCAS databases from inception to 14th August 2020 to identify relevant studies comparing warfarin and DOACs for LVT treatment and used the pooled data extracted from retrieved studies to perform a meta-analysis.Results: We report pooled data on 1955 patients from 8 studies, with a mean age of 61 years and 59.7 years in warfarin and DOACs group, respectively. The pooled odds ratio for thrombus resolution was 1.11 (95% CI 0.51–2.39) on comparing warfarin to DOAC, but it did not reach a statistical significance (p = 0.76). The pooled risk ratio (RR) of stroke or systemic embolization and bleeding in patients treated with warfarin vs DOACs was 1.04 (95% CI 0.64–1.68; p = 0.85), and 1.15 (95% CI 0.62–2.13; p = 0.57), respectively; with an overall RR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.70–1.70; p =0.48) for mortality.Conclusions: DOACs appears to be non-inferior or at least as effective as warfarin in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus without any statistical difference in stroke or bleeding complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document