Occurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation during pacing for sinus node disease: The influence of His bundle pacing versus managed ventricular pacing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Pastore ◽  
Lina Marcantoni ◽  
Daniela Lanza ◽  
Massimiliano Maines ◽  
Franco Noventa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
His Bundle ◽  
His Bundle Pacing ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Disease

Atrial tachyarrhythmias in bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome: characterization and evolution

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1954-1957
Author(s):  
Luigi Padeletti ◽  
Roberto De Ponti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Atrial Flutter ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Ventricular Myocardium ◽  
Sinus Node Dysfunction ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Atrial Tachyarrhythmias ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Disease

The association of sinus node disease and atrial tachyarrhythmias characterizes the bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome, which may result in an increased risk of heart failure, stroke, and death. Ageing and several cardiac and extracardiac diseases, which have the potential to affect both the atrial and the ventricular myocardium, can manifest their influence predominantly on the atria, leading to an atrial cardiomyopathy. In these cases, the same pathological process which leads to sinus node dysfunction can create a favourable substrate also for atrial tachyarrhythmias, which, if not present at the time of the initial diagnosis of the sinus node disease, can occur with an increasing prevalence during follow-up. In younger patients with no evident structural heart disease, a bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome may be the first clinical and unexpected manifestation of a still undiagnosed inherited genetic disease and therefore a specific diagnostic workup is necessary. In bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome, the most frequently encountered atrial tachyarrhythmia is atrial fibrillation, while typical atrial flutter is rarer. In peculiar subgroups of patients, other atrial tachyarrhythmias, such as atypical atrial flutter, macroreentrant or focal atrial tachycardia, may be present. In bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome, the evolution of atrial tachyarrhythmias clearly shows a worsening with an prevalence of associated atrial tachyarrhythmia over time. Pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias is of limited use, due to the concomitant sinus node dysfunction. The modality of pacing used to manage the sinus node disease has to be carefully chosen to minimize the evolution of atrial tachyarrhythmias. In fact, while ventricular pacing increases the incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke, dual-chamber pacing with a specific algorithm for ventricular pacing minimization and prevention and treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias reduces a composite endpoint of evolution to permanent atrial fibrillation, hospitalization, and death.

scholarly journals The back-up lead in his bundle pacing: evolution over the years

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Zanon ◽  
L Marcantoni ◽  
G Pastore ◽  
E Baracca ◽  
C Picariello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Rapid Reduction ◽  
His Bundle ◽  
His Bundle Pacing ◽  
Conduction Disturbances ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
Fixed Curve ◽  
Lead Fixation

Abstract Background His bundle pacing (HBP) can be affected by high thresholds and low sensing. Thus, in selected patients including a back-up lead is advisable. Objective Single-centre retrospective analysis of a large HBP experience, focusing on the back-up lead utilization over the years. Methods 677 pts (76±8 years; 433 males) were implanted with HBP from 2004 to 2019 July. The pts received S-HBP (67%) or NS-HBP by the 3830 lead. The pacing indications were AV block 54%, sinus node disease 17%, slow atrial fibrillation 23%, heart failure 6%. Ischemic cardiopathy was found in 26%; hypertension in 83%, diabetes in28% pts. Baseline QRS duration was 123±32 ms and EF 56±12%. Results 266 (39%) pts received the back-up lead. In sinus rhythm we implanted 3-chamber PM (His lead:LV port; VV delay 80 ms: His pulses and apical pacing during the refractory period). 30 pts (11%) received a particular type of 3-chamber PM which provides back-up pacing only if His capture fails, thus saving energy. In atrial fibrillation 2-chamber PM was implanted (His lead: atrial port, DVI). We recorded a significant decrease of back-up lead use over the years, strictly related to operators/centre experience (>70% during the first years, nearly 10% during the last year). The C315 fixed curve sheath, strongly contributed to the rapid reduction of back-up lead use thanks to better lead fixation and stability. Conclusion The back-up lead utilization is progressively decreasing. It is strictly related to the operator/centre experience. The presence of the back-up lead could strengthen the Hisian pacing reliability, potentially impacting pacing indication even in advanced conduction disturbances and saving device longevity. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Minimizing Ventricular Pacing to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation in Sinus-Node Disease

2007 ◽  
Vol 357 (10) ◽  
pp. 1000-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael O. Sweeney ◽  
Alan J. Bank ◽  
Emmanuel Nsah ◽  
Maria Koullick ◽  
Qian Cathy Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Disease

P5675Ischemic stroke in patient with sinus node disease in comparison to atrial fibrillation, bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome and other cardiac conditions: a nationwide cohort-study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Bodin ◽  
A Bisson ◽  
N Clementy ◽  
B Pierre ◽  
J Herbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Control Population ◽  
National Database ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cardiac Condition ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Disease

Abstract Atrial fibrillation (AF) may be associated with sinus node disease (SND) presenting as a brady-tachy syndrome (BTS), known to be at risk for embolic ischemic stroke (IS). It remains unclear whether the risk of IS is increased in patients with isolated SND. Methods This French longitudinal cohort study was based on the national database covering hospital care from for the entire population (PMSI) from 2010 to 2015. We compared incidences of IS in patients with a diagnosis of AF or SND to that in a control group of patients with a main diagnosis of cardiac condition (excluding those with AF or SND, history of stroke and mechanical valve or mitral stenosis). Results Of 1,732,412 patients included in the cohort, 1,601,435 (92.44%) had isolated AF, 102,849 (5.94%) had isolated SND and 28,128 (1.62%) had BTS. The control group with cardiac condition included 479,108 patients. Incidence of IS progressively increased when considering patients from the control population, patients with isolated SND, with BTS or with isolated AF (0.67%/yr, 1.95%/yr, 3.03%/yr and 5.48%/yr respectively). These differences were seen in all strata of CHA2DS2VASc score (table). SND patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3 had a yearly incidence of IS >2%, comparable to AF population with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1. Incidence (%/year) of ischemic stroke CHA2DS2-VASc AF population SND population “Control” population Women Men Women Men Women Men All scores 6.72% 4.37% 1.93% 1.96% 0.67% 0.68% Score = 0 – 1.960% – 1.211% – 0.217% Score = 1 2.337% 3.046% 0.538% 1.486% 0.166% 0.345% Score = 2 3.917% 4.499% 0.879% 1.541% 0.298% 0.580% Score = 3 7.572% 4.733% 2.207% 2.084% 0.541% 0.907% Score = 4 7.016% 4.820% 2.363% 2.305% 0.930% 1.278% Score = 5 6.725% 5.345% 2.845% 2.849% 1.249% 1.553% Score = 6 7.637% 7.543% 3.319% 4.109% 1.737% 2.031% Score = 7 10.196% 13.927% 4.663% 7.708% 2.346% 4.089% Score = 8 17.654% 12.607% 8.519% 11.904% 2.446% 2.355% Conclusion Patients with isolated SND had a lower risk of IS than patients with AF or BTS. However, SND patients had a non-neglectable risk of IS during follow-up which was higher than in a “control” population. Whether oral anticoagulation may bring a significant clinical benefit might be studied in patients with SND at highest risk of IS.

Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing with the Managed Ventricular Pacing Mode in Patients with Sinus Node Disease and AV Block

2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 697-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNE M. GILLIS ◽  
HELMUT PURERFELLNER ◽  
CARSTEN W. ISRAEL ◽  
HENRI SUNTHORN ◽  
SALEM KACET ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Av Block ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Right Ventricular Pacing ◽  
Pacing Mode ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Disease

Pacing in sinus node disease to prevent atrial fibrillation

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 851-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Brix Kronborg ◽  
Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Sinus Node Disease
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document