Programmed ventricular stimulation in arrhyhtmogenic myocarditis: Foraging into the unknown!

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 702-704
Author(s):  
Gurukripa N. Kowlgi ◽  
Abhishek J. Deshmukh
Keyword(s):  
Programmed Ventricular Stimulation ◽  
Ventricular Stimulation

Abstract 3003: Programmed Ventricular Stimulation Does Not Predict the Outcome of Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (from DARVIN study)

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Corrado ◽  
Loira Leoni ◽  
Mark S Link ◽  
Hugh Calkins ◽  
Thomas Wichter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sudden Death ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Programmed Ventricular Stimulation ◽  
Ventricular Stimulation ◽  
History Of

Background: The Defibrillator in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy International (DARVIN) study was a multicenter investigation that enrolled patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) who received an implantable defibrillator (ICD) for either secondary or primary prevention of sudden death. Methods: In this DARVIN substudy, we examined whether programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is able to predict the arrhythmic risk in a large cohort of 201 ARVC patients (133 males, 68 females, aged 36 ± 12 years) who received an ICD. Implant indications were a history of cardiac arrest in 13 (6%) patients; sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 82 (41%); syncope in 42 (21%); asymptomatic nonsustained VT in 40 (20%); and a family history of sudden death in 24 (12%). PVS prior to ICD implantation was carried out in 143 of 201 patients (71%). All antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued ≥ 5 half-lives (≥ 6 weeks for amiodarone) before the study. PVS included a minimum of 2 drive cycles length and up to 3 ventricular extrastimuli while pacing from two right ventricular sites. Results: One hundred-nine patients (76%) were inducible to either sustained VT (patients 70; 64%), with a mean cycle length of 287 ± 66ms (range 220 to 410 ms), or ventricular fibrillation/flutter (VF) (patients 39; 36%). Of 109 patients who were inducible at PVS, 56 (52%) did not experience ICD therapy during a mean follow-up of 47 ± 22 months, whereas 11 of 34 (33%) noninducible patients had appropriate ICD interventions. Overall, the positive predictive value of PVS was 48%, the negative predictive value 67%, and the test accuracy 53%. The incidence of ICD discharges on VF, which in all likelihood would have been fatal in the absence of ICD therapy, did not differ between patients who were and were not inducible at PVS (26 of 109, 24% vs 7 of 34, 21%; p=0.87), regardless of clinical presentation. The type of ventricular arrhythmia inducible at PVS did not predict VF during the follow-up. Conclusions: The presence (or absence) of an inducible arrhythmia on PVS did not correlate with subsequent appropriate ICD interventions, suggesting a limited role for PVS in arrhythmic risk stratification of ARVC patient population. A negative PVS may not indicate better prognosis.

P355Complete non-inducibility after radiofrequency ablation for electrical storm improves survival rates

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Nastasa ◽  
C Cojocaru ◽  
D A Radu ◽  
E Goanta ◽  
V Iliese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Electrical Storm ◽  
Programmed Ventricular Stimulation ◽  
Ventricular Stimulation ◽  
Threatening Condition ◽  
Acute Success

Abstract Background Electric storm is a life threatening condition, that can complicate multiple cardiac pathologies and is associated with high mortality.  Catheter ablation has been shown to reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden in patients with electrical storm but the optimal procedural endpoint and the therapeutic particularities required by different etiologies are still under debate. Purpose Our objective was to determine if there are any periprocedural factors that influence midterm outcomes.  We also sought if there were any significant differences between the results for ischemic and nonischemic patients. Methods The study included 66 consecutive patients, mean age 60 years, 82% males, treated for electrical storm in our center with endocardial/endo-epicardial radiofrequncy catheter ablation (with or without remote magnetic navigation). Acute success was defined as elimination of the clinical tachycardia with complete non-inducibility (including ventricular fibrillation) or non-inducibility for monomorphic VT with programmed ventricular stimulation using up to 4 extrastimuli. Mean follow-up duration was 9.4 months and the type of recurrence was catalogued in 3 categories: initial VT (isolated), electric storm and other sustained VT. Results The overall acute success rate was 93%, complete non-inducibility was achieved in 64.5% and non-inducibility for monomorphic VT in 87.5% of the cases. Epicardial approach was used in 44% of the non-ischemic cases vs 10.5% of the ischemic ones (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between complete noninducibility rates and recurrence/death rates of the ischemic vs nonischemic groups. Among the variables analysed for predicting noninducibility, only two reached statistical significance: mean QRS duration of the clinical tachycardia (160 ± 32 ms vs 240 ± 63.3ms, p = 0.02) and shortest RS complex (124 ± 14.7 ms vs 210 ± 12ms, p = 0.02). Recurrent ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 25% of the patients during follow up, from which: 27.2 % initial VT (isolated), 36.4% electric storm and 36.4% other sustained VT. Death rate was 10.6% (7 patients).  Kaplan Meier plot showed that the lot with complete noninducibility after programmed ventricular stimulation had better survival rates (p = 0.01). Conclusions Ablative therapy had a good acute success rate, without significant differences between ischemic and noninschemic patients in our study. Complete noninducibility after programmed ventricular stimulation  after ablation was associated with better survival rates. Unsuccessfull ablation is a predictor of inhospital death of these patients.

Programmed ventricular stimulation in mitral valve prolapse: Analysis of 36 patients

1984 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Morady ◽  
Edward Shen ◽  
Anil Bhandari ◽  
Alan Schwartz ◽  
Melvin M. Scheinman
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Valve Prolapse ◽  
Programmed Ventricular Stimulation ◽  
Ventricular Stimulation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document