Catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists: What is the relationship between international normalized ratio, activated clotting time, and procedure-related complications?

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1415-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Kottmaier ◽  
Felix Bourier ◽  
Verena Semmler ◽  
Martha Telishevska ◽  
Katharina Koch-Büttner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Atrial Arrhythmias ◽  
Clotting Time ◽  
Activated Clotting Time ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals Management of Intraprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients on Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Céline Martin ◽  
Anne Godier ◽  
Kumar Narayanan ◽  
David M. Smadja ◽  
Eloi Marijon
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Clotting Time ◽  
Anticoagulation Management ◽  
Activated Clotting Time

Catheter ablation has gained a prominent role in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), with recent data providing positive evidence on hard outcomes, including hospitalization and mortality. Ablation, however, exposes the patient to a rather unique situation, combining risks for both major bleeding and thromboembolic events. In this setting, the critical importance of rigorous anticoagulation during the procedure has been underlined, and the latest international guidelines now recommend performing AF catheter ablation with uninterrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and concomitant administration of unfractionated heparin adjusted to achieve and maintain a target activated clotting time of ≥300 seconds. Whereas observational studies and randomized controlled trials support the safety and efficacy of uninterrupted NOAC strategy for AF catheter ablation, recent experiences have questioned this point, showing a greater unfractionated heparin requirement in NOAC-treated patients compared with vitamin K antagonists–treated patients to achieve the target activated clotting time. Important gaps in evidence regarding optimal intraprocedural anticoagulation management need to be acknowledged. A thorough appreciation of the physiology of anticoagulation during AF catheter ablation and the relevant differences between vitamin K antagonists and NOACs is required, while also understanding the limitations of activated clotting time measurement with regard to accurate intraprocedural anticogulation monitoring. This review aims to provide a critical look at this relatively ignored aspect of AF catheter ablation, especially pitfalls in NOAC monitoring, and to identify gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed in the near future.

scholarly journals Should we Test the Prothrombin Time in Anticoagulated Epistaxis Patients?

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. ar.2013.4.0049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. Soyka ◽  
David Holzmann
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Increased Risk

Epistaxis is one of the most frequent emergencies in rhinology. Patients using anticoagulative medication are at increased risk for epistaxis. We evaluated the prothrombin time and the international normalized ratio (INR) in anticoagulated epistaxis patients. Patients suffering from epistaxis were prospectively included in a database and results from prothrombin testing were analyzed in the context of anticoagulation. One hundred sixteen of 591 epistaxis cases were identified to be on oral anticoagulation. The INR was found to be above therapeutic levels in 19 (16%) of these cases. We strongly recommend prothrombin time and INR testing in all epistaxis patients taking any sort of vitamin K antagonists.

scholarly journals Running after Activated Clotting Time Values in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Potentially Dangerous Race. Results from a Prospective Study in Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Procedures

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4240
Author(s):  
Karim Benali ◽  
Julien Verain ◽  
Nefissa Hammache ◽  
Charles Guenancia ◽  
Darren Hooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Clotting Time ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Activated Clotting Time ◽  
Real Increase ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Activated Clotting Time (ACT) guided heparinization is the gold standard for titrating unfractionated heparin (UFH) administration during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. The current ACT target (300 s) is based on studies in patients receiving a vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Several studies have shown that in patients receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), the correlation between ACT values and UFH delivered dose is weak. Objective: To assess the relationship between ACT and real heparin anticoagulant effect measured by anti-Xa activity in patients receiving different anticoagulant treatments. Methods: Patients referred for AF catheter ablation in our centre were prospectively included depending on their anticoagulant type. Results: 113 patients were included, receiving rivaroxaban (n = 30), apixaban (n = 30), dabigatran (n = 30), and VKA (n = 23). To meet target ACT, a higher UFH dose was required in DOAC than VKA patients (14,077.8 IU vs. 9565.2 IU, p < 0.001), leading to a longer time to achieve target ACT (46.5 min vs. 27.3 min, p = 0.001). The correlation of ACT and anti-Xa activity was tighter in the VKA group (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.53), compared to the DOAC group (ρ = 0.19). Despite lower ACT values in the DOAC group, this group demonstrated a higher mean anti-Xa activity compared to the VKA group (1.56 ± 0.39 vs. 1.14 ± 0.36; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Use of a conventional ACT threshold at 300 s during AF ablation procedures leads to a significant increase in UFH administration in patients treated with DOACs. This increase corresponds more likely to an overdosing than a real increase in UFH requirement.

Spectrophotometric Assays of Prothrombin in Plasma of Patients Using Oral Anticoagulants

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 1296-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
R M Bertina ◽  
W van der Marel-van Nieuwkoop ◽  
E A Loeliger
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Factor Ii ◽  
K Deficiency

SummaryTwo spectrophotometric assays for prothrombin have been developed and compared with a one stage coagulant and an immunological assay. One of these assays (called the XAPC assay) uses a combination of factor Xa, phospholipid, Ca2+ and factor V as activator of prothrombin, and measures only normal prothrombin. The second (the ECAR assay) uses Echis carinatus venom as activator. This assay measures both normal prothrombin and PIVKA II (protein induced by vitamin K antagonists/absence). Combination of the results obtained by the XAPC and ECAR assays provides rapid and reliable information on the degree of “subcarboxylation” of prothrombin (oral anticoagulation, vitamin K deficiency).For patients on long term anticoagulant treatment the prothrombin time (Thrombotest) shows better correlation with the ratio prothrombin/prothrombin plus PIVKA II (XAPC/ ECAR) than with the factor II concentration. For patients starting the anticoagulant treatment there is no correlation between the Thrombotest time and the XAPC/ECAR ratio.It seems doubtful that (a) spectrophotometric factor II assay(s) will be as useful as the prothrombin time in the control of oral anticoagulation.

scholarly journals Comparison of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion versus Non-Vitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation: An Update

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Shaojie Chen ◽  
K. R. Julian Chun ◽  
Zhiyu Ling ◽  
Shaowen Liu ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
The Mean

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF). Non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) have an improved safety profile over VKAs; however, evidence regarding their effect on cardiovascular and neurological outcomes relative to LAAO is limited. Up-to-date randomized trials or propensity-score-matched data comparing LAAO vs. NOACs in high-risk patients with AF were pooled in our study. A total of 2849 AF patients (LAAO: 1368, NOACs: 1481, mean age: 75 ± 7.5 yrs, 63.5% male) were enrolled. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.7, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 3.4 ± 1.2. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the LAAO group, the success rate of device implantation was 98.8%. During a mean follow-up of 2 years, as compared with NOACs, LAAO was associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in terms of ischemic stroke (p = 0.61), ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (p = 0.63), ISTH major and clinically relevant minor bleeding (p = 0.73), cardiovascular death (p = 0.63), and all-cause mortality (p = 0.71). There was a trend toward reduction of combined major cardiovascular and neurological endpoints in the LAAO group (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.64–1.11, p = 0.12). In conclusion, for high-risk AF patients, LAAO is associated with a significant reduction of ISTH major bleeding without increased ischemic events, as compared to “contemporary NOACs”. The present data show the superior role of LAAO over NOACs among high-risk AF patients in terms of reduction of major bleeding; however, more randomized controlled trials are warranted.

scholarly journals Comparison of international normalized ratio audit parameters in patients enrolled in GARFIELD-AF and treated with vitamin K antagonists

2016 ◽  
Vol 174 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Fitzmaurice ◽  
Gabriele Accetta ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
Gloria Kayani ◽  
Hector Lucas Luciardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
International Normalized Ratio

scholarly journals Inferior Vena Cava Agenesis and Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Pharmacological Alternative to Vitamin K Antagonists

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inês Esteves Cruz ◽  
Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Raquel Silva ◽  
Francisco Silva ◽  
Isabel Madruga
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Inferior Vena Cava ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Inferior vena cava (IVC) agenesis is a rare congenital abnormality affecting the infrarenal segment, the suprarenal or the whole of the IVC. It has an estimated prevalence of up to 1% in the general population that can rise to 8.7% when abnormalities of the left renal vein are considered. Most IVC malformations are asymptomatic but may be associated with nonspecific symptoms or present as deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Up to 5% of young individuals under 30 years of age with unprovoked DVT are found to have this condition. Regarding the treatment of IVC agenesis-associated DVT, there are no standard guidelines. Treatment is directed towards preventing thrombosis or its recurrence. Low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulation medication, in particular vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the mainstay of therapy. Given the high risk of DVT recurrence in these patients, oral anticoagulation therapy is suggested to be pursued indefinitely. As far as we know, this is the first case reporting the use of a direct factor Xa inhibitor in IVC agenesis-associated DVT. Given VKA monitoring limitations, the use of a direct Xa inhibitor could be an alternative in young individuals with anatomical defects without thrombophilia, but further studies will be needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.

scholarly journals The international normalized ratio (INR) as seen in a population of patients with atrial fibrillation and cerebral infarction undergoing long-term treatment with vitamin K antagonists

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-272
Author(s):  
Anna Szczepańska-Szerej ◽  
Magdalena Wojtan ◽  
Beata Szajnoga
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Blood Parameters ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Abstract It is estimated that nearly 20% of all cerebral infarctions in the total population are the result of a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). While oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (AVKs) substantially reduces this risk, this requires regular monitoring of the international normalized ratio (INR) in order to achieve therapeutic levels (2,0-3,0). The aim of this study was to evaluate a group at high risk of cerebral infarction, among patients with AF undergoing long-term treatment with VKAs, taking into account the significance of therapeutic INR values. The analysed group consisted of 90 acute ischaemic stroke patients with paroxysmal or chronic “non-valvular” AF, receiving treatment with VKAs. As a result of the study, therapeutic INR values (≥ 2) were seen in thirty-five of these individuals (38,8%), while 55 (61,2%) showed non-therapeutic INR values. Moreover, there were no differences in demographics, vascular risk factors, biochemical and morphological blood parameters, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score and TOAST classification between either of the two groups. Furthermore, no additional factor that would increase their risk of cerebral infarction during the adequate treatment with VKAs was found. However, patients with non-therapeutic INR values had a statistically significantly higher frequency of concomitant moderate pathology of the bicuspid valve, p<0.05. Hence, a lack of proper control of INR can proved to be particularly dangerous for this subgroup of patients. Hence, this is a group with an elevated risk of cerebral infarction and therefore requires special oversight of VKA treatment or NOA treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document