Cardiac Metastasis Causing Right Bundle Branch Block and Recurrent Septal Ventricular Tachycardia

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 793-794
Author(s):  
MARWAN BADRI ◽  
JASON BRADLEY ◽  
ROBERT JU ◽  
GAN-XIN YAN
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Cardiac Metastasis ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

Diagnosis and Ablation of Fascicular Tachycardia

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Akihiko Nogami ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Axis Deviation ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Rare Form ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Diagnosis And Therapy ◽  
Narrow Qrs ◽  
Left Posterior ◽  
Qrs Morphology

Verapamil-sensitive fascicular ventricular tachycardia (VT) is the most common form of idiopathic left VT. According to the QRS morphology and the successful ablation site, left fascicular VT can be classified into three subgroups: left posterior fascicular VT, whose QRS morphology shows right bundle branch block (RBBB) configuration and superior axis (common form); left anterior fascicular VT, whose QRS morphology shows RBBB configuration and right-axis deviation (uncommon form), and upper septal fascicular VT, whose QRS morphology shows narrow QRS configuration and normal or right-axis deviation (rare form). Posterior and anterior fascicular VT can be successfully ablated at the posterior or anterior mid-septum with a diastolic Purkinje potential during VT or at the VT exit site with a fused pre-systolic Purkinje potential. Upper septal fascicular VT can also be ablated at the site with diastolic Purkinje potential at the upper septum. Recognition of the heterogeneity of this VT and its unique characteristics should facilitate appropriate diagnosis and therapy.

scholarly journals Sustained ventricular tachycardia of left, right or both bundle branch block morphology in patients with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Milman ◽  
M Laredo ◽  
R Roudijk ◽  
G Peretto ◽  
A Andorin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Group 3

Abstract Aims In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) typically displays left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology. Sustained VT with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology is very rare despite the frequent left ventricular involvement. The present study sought to assess the prevalence of spontaneous sustained LBBB-VT, RBBB-VT or both as well as clinical and genetic differences associated with these VT types. Methods and results Twenty-six centers from 11 European countries provided information on 952 patients with ACM and >1 episode of sustained VT observed during the patients' clinical course. VT was classified as: LBBB-VT; RBBB-VT or LBBB+RBBB-VT. Among 952 patients, 881 (92.5%) had LBBB-VT alone, 71 (7.5%) had RBBB-VT [alone in 42 (4.4%) patients or with LBBB-VT in 29 (3.0%) patients]. Male prevalence was 90.5%, 79.2% and 55.9% in the RBBB-VT, LBBB-VT and LBBB+RBBB-VT groups, respectively (P=0.001). Patients' age at first VT did not differ amongst the 3 VT groups. ICD implantation was more frequent for the RBBB-VT and the LBBB+RBBB groups (≈90% each) vs. 67.9% for the LBBB-VT group (P=0.001). Death incidence (9.5%–17.2%) was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P=0.425). Plakophylin-2 mutations predominated in the LBBB-VT and LBBB-VT+RBBB-VT groups (47.2% and 27.3%, respectively) and Desmoplakin mutations in the RBBB-VT group (36.7%). Conclusion This large European survey demonstrates: 1) Sustained RBBB-VT is documented in 7.5% patients with ACM; 2) Males markedly predominate in the RBBB-VT and LBBB-VT groups but not in the LBBB+RBBB VT group; 3) Distribution of desmosomal mutations appears to be different in the 3 VT groups. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Ventricular tachycardia in children with diphtheritic myocarditis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 182-7
Author(s):  
A. Samik Wahab
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Terminal State ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Bundle Branch Block

Nine children with diphtheritic ventricular tachycardia ranging in age from 2 to 11 years (mean 6.5 years) were observed and followed up until their terminal state. The ventricular tachycardia showed a left bundle branch block contour in 5 of 9 patients, right bundle branch block in four, multifocal pacemaker in three and unifocal in six patients. Fusion and captured beats were present in two and 4 patients respectively, Including one patient who had both. Four cases were without obvious atrio-ventricular dissociation. All patients were treated with standard therapy for diphtheria, and prednison was given to patients with myocarditis. Because of its controversial results, antwrrhythm1c agent was not given. The prognosis is very poor; all patients died one to 8 days after ventricular tachycardia appearance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document