The effect of restatements on analyst behavior

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 986-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlai Ye ◽  
Lin-Hui Yu
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Alok Kumar ◽  
Ville Rantala ◽  
Rosy Xu

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karol Marek Klimczak ◽  
Marta Dynel

Professionals and individuals who invest in equity markets rely on financial analysts’ recommendations and reports to decide on what to invest in and when to trade. This study examines the role of two groups of communication strategies, evaluation markers and mitigators, in establishing analysts’ credibility. The sample consists of 80 reports written in Polish for companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in Poland. In this emerging market setting, where credibility is challenged by uncertainty, analysts deploy various strategies depending on the recommendation they make: “buy,” “hold,” or “sell” shares. The findings point toward a specific group of mitigators, namely subjectivization, as a means of communicating expert opinion. Regression results reveal that investors’ reaction to the publication of a recommendation to “hold” or “sell” shares, measured based on the changes in share prices, is stronger when subjectivization is used in a report. The findings carry implications for research into analyst behavior and for the development of professional writing skills.


2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 5-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter I. Boudry ◽  
Jarl G. Kallberg ◽  
Crocker H. Liu
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Bradley ◽  
Bradford D. Jordan ◽  
Jay R. Ritter
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok Kumar ◽  
Ville Rantala ◽  
Ruoxi Xu

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Bradley ◽  
Angela G. Morgan ◽  
Jack G. Wolf

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document