scholarly journals Use of Munsell color charts to measure skin tone objectively in nursing home residents at risk for pressure ulcer development

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 2077-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather E. McCreath ◽  
Barbara M. Bates-Jensen ◽  
Gojiro Nakagami ◽  
Anabel Patlan ◽  
Howard Booth ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila A Reynolds ◽  
Marlene Wellman Schmid ◽  
Marion E Broome ◽  
Jeanne Beauchamp Hewitt

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-46
Author(s):  
Barbara M. Bates-Jensen ◽  
Kailey Anber ◽  
Maximus M. Chen ◽  
Sierra Collins ◽  
Adriana N. Esparza ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 463-469
Author(s):  
Tracey L. Yap ◽  
Susan Kennerly ◽  
Susan D. Horn ◽  
Ryan Barrett ◽  
Jequie Dixon ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubing Cai ◽  
Dana B. Mukamel ◽  
Helena Temkin-Greener

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
G. Faxén-Irving ◽  
Y. Luiking ◽  
H. Grönstedt ◽  
E. Franzén ◽  
Å. Seiger ◽  
...  

Objectives: To study the prevalence and overlap between malnutrition, sarcopenia and frailty in a selected group of nursing home (NH) residents. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: Nursing homes (NH). Participants: 92 residents taking part in an exercise and oral nutritional supplementation study; >75 years old, able to rise from a seated position, body mass index ≤30 kg/m2 and not receiving protein-rich oral nutritional supplements. Measurements: The MNA-SF and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were used for screening and diagnosis of malnutrition (moderate or severe), respectively. Sarcopenia risk was assessed by the SARC-F Questionnaire (0-10p; ≥4=increased risk), and for diagnosis the European Working Group of Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) criteria was used. To screen for frailty the FRAIL Questionnaire (0-5p; 1-2p indicating pre-frailty, and >3p indicating frailty), was employed. Results: Average age was 86 years; 62% were women. MNA-SF showed that 30 (33%) people were at risk or malnourished. The GLIM criteria verified malnutrition in 16 (17%) subjects. One third (n=33) was at risk for sarcopenia by SARC-F. Twenty-seven (29%) subjects displayed confirmed sarcopenic according to EWGSOP2. Around 50% (n=47) was assessed as pre-frail or frail. Six people (7%) suffered from all three conditions. Another five (5%) of the residents were simultaneously malnourished and sarcopenic, but not frail, while frailty coexisted with sarcopenia in 10% (n=9) of non-malnourished residents. Twenty-nine (32%) residents were neither malnourished, sarcopenic nor frail. Conclusions: In a group of selected NH residents a majority was either (pre)frail (51%), sarcopenic (29%) or malnourished (17%). There were considerable overlaps between the three conditions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E Alexander ◽  
Robin Armstrong ◽  
George Fareed ◽  
Kulvinder K. Gill ◽  
John Lotus ◽  
...  

AbstractThe outbreak of COVID-19 from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread all over the world with tremendous morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In-hospital treatment addresses the multifaceted nature of the illness including viral replication, cytokine storm, and endothelial injury with thrombosis. We identified nine reports of early treatment outcomes in COVID-19 nursing home patients. Multi-drug therapy including hydroxychloroquine with one or more anti-infectives, corticosteroids, and antithrombotic agents can be extended to seniors in the nursing home setting without hospitalization. Data from nine studies found multidrug regimens relying on the use of hydroxychloroquine as well as other agents including doxycycline were associated with a statistically significant and >60% reductions in mortality. Going forward, we theorize and based on the evidence, that early empiric treatment for the elderly with COVID-19 in the nursing home setting (or similar congregated settings with elderly residents/patients) has a genuine probability of success and acceptable safety. This group remains our highest at-risk group and warrants acute treatment focus that will prevent the development and/or worsening of problems associated with COVID-19, most particularly isolation, hospitalization, and death. In fact, with the rapidity and severity of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in nursing homes, in-center treatment of patients with acute COVID-19 is possibly the most rational and importantly feasible strategy to reduce the risks of hospitalization and death. If the approach remains ‘wait-and-see’ and elderly high-risk patients in such congregated nursing room type settings are allowed to worsen with no early treatment, they may be too sick and fragile to benefit from in-hospital therapeutics and are at risk for pulmonary failure, life-ending micro-thrombi of the lungs, kidneys etc. We put forth the notion that the most important factor in this regard, is making available early therapeutic intervention as described here. These drugs include and under supervision by skilled doctors, combination/sequenced ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, colchicine, azithromycin, doxycycline, bromhexine hydrochloride, and favipiravir (outside the US), along with inhaled steroids such as budesonide and oral steroids including dexamethasone and prednisone, and anti-thrombotic anti-clotting drugs such as heparin). As the clinical trials data on treatments for COVID-19 mature, this early treatment therapeutic option deserves serious, urgent, and sober consideration by the medical establishment and respective decision-makers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document