Working with older people with multiple long-term conditions: a qualitative exploration of nurses' experiences

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Waterworth ◽  
Merryn Gott ◽  
Deborah Raphael ◽  
John Parsons ◽  
Bruce Arroll
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Lunt ◽  
Chris Shiels ◽  
Christopher Dowrick ◽  
Mari Lloyd-Williams

Abstract Background Day care services can support older people living with multiple long term conditions (LTCs), to age in place, but little research on outcomes of Day Care attendance. Aims The aims of this comparative study were to determine outcomes for older people with LTCs attending day care services run entirely by paid staff or predominantly volunteers Methods Newly referred older people with LTCs to nine day care services in North West of England and North Wales were invited to participate in this longitudinal study with data being collected at baseline attendance and at 6 and 12 weeks. Demographic information was collected and the EQ-5D-3L and De Jong Loneliness 6 item questionnaire were completed at each time point.RESULTS 94 older people (64% female),age range 65 - 99 years (mean 82 years) were recruited. The mean number of LTCs was 4.3 (range 2-9) and 52% people lived alone. More than a third (36%) lived in one of the 20% most deprived local authorities in England and Wales. The outcomes in this exploratory study over 12 weeks appeared to be similar for paid, blended (paid staff and volunteers) and for volunteer led service, with those attending volunteer led services were significantly more likely to report fewer health problems in follow-up (OR=3.45, 95% CI 1.01-12.8, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that Day Care Services for older people with long term conditions provide benefits in terms of self-rated physical and emotional well-being. Older people attending paid staff services were more likely to have greater number of LTCs associated with a higher symptom burden. However, at baseline there was no difference in self-reported health by service type. This study suggests that Day Care Services provided by volunteers can provide comparable outcomes. Following the Covid-19 pandemic, it is increasingly urgent to support older people with long term conditions who have lost physical and cognitive function during lockdown and to maintain and improve their function. Our study suggests that volunteers may be able to complement the care provided by paid staff freeing up resources and enabling increasing numbers of people to be supported.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Robinson ◽  
Esmée Hanna ◽  
Gary Raine ◽  
Steve Robertson

This article examines how a 6-week mental health resilience course for people with long-term conditions (LTCs; diabetes, heart disease, and arthritis) increased perceived resilience of older participants. This article examines how peer support assisted participants to develop resilience, considers gender issues, examines the importance of course activities, and explores how resilience enhances quality of life. A mixed methods approach was used. A before-and-after questionnaire was administered 3 times, including 3-month follow-up. Interviews were held with 24 program participants, aged 45 to 80 years. Diaries were kept by participants over 3 months. Survey findings showed significant gains in perceived resilience, at the end of the course, with no significant drop-off after 3 months. Interview and diary narratives highlighted positive experiences around well-being, condition management, and social engagement. Peer support was key to effective processes. Challenges concern ongoing support in communities, and considering age and gender variables when researching what improved resilience means to older people with LTCs.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e033186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Aaron Munford ◽  
Anna Wilding ◽  
Peter Bower ◽  
Matt Sutton

ObjectivesImproving outcomes for older people with long-term conditions and multimorbidity is a priority. Current policy commits to substantial expansion of social prescribing to community assets, such as charity, voluntary or community groups. We use longitudinal data to add to the limited evidence on whether this is associated with better quality of life or lower costs of care.DesignProspective 18-month cohort survey of self-reported participation in community assets and quality of life linked to administrative care records. Effects of starting and stopping participation estimated using double-robust estimation.SettingParticipation in community asset facilities. Costs of primary and secondary care.Participants4377 older people with long-term conditions.InterventionParticipation in community assets.Primary and secondary outcome measuresQuality-adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare costs and social value estimated using net benefits.ResultsStarting to participate in community assets was associated with a 0.017 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.032) gain in QALYs after 6 months, 0.030 (95% CI 0.005 to 0.054) after 12 months and 0.056 (95% CI 0.017 to 0.094) after 18 months. Cumulative effects on care costs were negative in each time period: £−96 (95% CI £−512 to £321) at 6 months; £−283 (95% CI £−926 to £359) at 12 months; and £−453 (95% CI £−1366 to £461) at 18 months. The net benefit of starting to participate was £1956 (95% CI £209 to £3703) per participant at 18 months. Stopping participation was associated with larger negative impacts of −0.102 (95% CI −0.173 to −0.031) QALYs and £1335.33 (95% CI £112.85 to £2557.81) higher costs after 18 months.ConclusionsParticipation in community assets by older people with long-term conditions is associated with improved quality of life and reduced costs of care. Sustaining that participation is important because there are considerable health changes associated with stopping. The results support the inclusion of community assets as part of an integrated care model for older patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Oliver

Falls are predominantly a problem of older people. In the UK, people over 65 currently account for around 60% of admissions and 70% of bed days in hospitals. There are approximately half a million older people in long-term care settings – many with frailty and multiple long-term conditions. The proportion of the population over 65 years is predicted to rise 25% by 2025, and that over 80 by 50%, with a similar increase in those with dependence for two or more activities of daily living. Despite policies to drive care to the community, it is likely that the proportion of older people in hospitals and care homes will therefore increase. Accidental falls are the commonest reported patient/resident safety incidents. Similar demographic trends can be seen in all developed nations, so that the growing problem of fall prevention in institutions is a global challenge. There has been far more focus in falls-prevention research on older people in ‘community’ settings, but falls are a pressing issue for hospitals and care homes, and a threat to the safety of patients and residents, even if a relatively small percentage of the population is in those settings at any one time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 504-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Nazarko

The prevalence of urinary incontinence increases as a person ages, as age-related changes make it more difficult to maintain continence. Long-term conditions and treatments prescribed to treat conditions, such as heart failure, can lead to an urgency to void the bladder. Frailty can make it difficult for an older person to respond this need. At end of life, mobility is often compromised and people can experience extreme fatigue. Caregivers can obtain support to manage an individual's incontinence during the day but often struggle alone at night. Caregivers can become exhausted and a situation can reach breaking point. Working with the older person and caregivers to determine the goals of care and how to meet them can make a huge difference. It can take the pressure off the entire family, meet a person's needs and enable the person to stay at home. This article aims to enable nurses to understand the problems older people may experience and how to work with the older person and caregivers to develop solutions that maintain dignity and enhance quality of life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 619-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Okeowo ◽  
Alastair Patterson ◽  
Cynthia Boyd ◽  
Emily Reeve ◽  
Danijela Gnjidic ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this study was (1) to apply the current United Kingdom (UK) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guidelines to a hypothetical older patient with multimorbidity and life-limiting illness; (2) consider how treatment choices could be influenced by NICE guidance specifically related to multimorbidity; and, (3) ascertain if such clinical practice guidelines describe how and when medication should be reviewed, reduced and stopped. Methods: Based upon common long-term conditions in older people, a hypothetical older patient was constructed. Relevant NICE guidelines were applied to the hypothetical patient to determine what medication should be initiated in three treatment models: a new patient model, a treatment-resistant model, and a last-line model. Medication complexity for each model was assessed according to the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI). Results: The majority of the guidelines recommended the initiation of medication in the hypothetical patient; if the initial treatment approach was unsuccessful, each guideline advocated the use of more medication, with the regimen becoming increasingly complex. In the new patient model, 4 separate medications (9 dosage units) would be initiated per day; for the treatment-resistant model, 6 separate medications (15 dosage units); and, for the last-line model, 11 separate medications (20 dosage units). None of the guidelines used for the hypothetical patient discussed approaches to stopping medication. Conclusions: In a UK context, disease-specific clinical practice guidelines routinely advocate the initiation of medication to manage long-term conditions, with medication regimens becoming increasingly complex through the different steps of care. There is often a lack of information regarding specific treatment recommendations for older people with life-limiting illness and multimorbidity. While guidelines frequently explain how and when a medication should be initiated, there is often no information concerning when and how the medications should be reduced or stopped.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Raphael ◽  
Susan Waterworth ◽  
Merryn Gott

Background and aims Long term conditions are a significant health problem faced by older people worldwide. Telephone communication is often used to deliver health care to patients and is an important tool in improving access to care. Previous research has shown that primary health care nurses communicate with patients by telephone, but little is known about the way in which telephone communication can be used to benefit older patients with long term conditions. The aims of this review were to identify the range and scope of telephone use between practice nurses working in primary health care and older people with long term conditions, explore which elements of this communication has been successful, and determine whether older people see telephone communication as useful for their needs. Methods A systematic search of the literature was conducted through CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE between July and August 2015. Included were English language articles containing older adults, primary care nurses and both qualitative and quantitative designs. Results Five studies met the inclusion criteria. All were intervention studies, and none looked at routine telephone communication between nurse and patient. Most studies showed that telephone based interventions were successful in improving pre-determined disease-specific health indicators. Conclusions All telephone communication interventions in this review focused on a specific long term condition, which they aimed to help patients self-manage. While all studies' samples included older patients, they did not consider them separately in relation to the effectiveness of the intervention. What was also lacking was the patient perspective regarding effectiveness in all but one study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document