scholarly journals Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 529-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingde Kong ◽  
Junming Cao ◽  
Yingze Zhang ◽  
Wenyuan Ding ◽  
Yong Shen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Argyris Costa Hadjimichael ◽  
Athanasios Fotios Foukas ◽  
Athanasios Antonopoulos ◽  
Olga Savvidou ◽  
Panayiotis Papagelopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip And Knee Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Li ◽  
Cristina Ojeda Thies ◽  
Chi Xu ◽  
Andrej Trampuz
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bibliometric Analysis ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Clinical Medicine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
The United States ◽  
Steroid Injections ◽  
Joint Replacement Surgery

Abstract Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication of joint replacement surgery. Further comorbidities include bedsore, deep vein thrombosis, reinfection, or even death. An increasing number of researchers are focusing on this challenging complication. The aim of the present study was to estimate global PJI research based on bibliometrics from meta-analysis studies. Methods: A database search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Relevant studies were assessed using the bibliometric analysis. Results: A total of 117 articles were included. The most relevant literature on PJI was found on Scopus. China made the highest contributions to global research, followed by the United States and the United Kingdom. The institution with the most contributions from the University of Bristol. The journal with the highest number of publications was The Journal of Arthroplasty, whereas the Journal of Clinical Medicine had the shortest acceptance time. The day of the week with the greatest number of received and accepted manuscripts was Wednesday. Furthermore, the top three frequently used databases were Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane. The most frequent number of authors in meta-analysis studies was four. Most studies focused on the periprosthetic hip and knee. The alpha-defensin diagnostic test, preventive measures on antibiotics use, and risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections were the most popular topic in recent years. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, we found that there was no single database covered all relevant articles, the optimal method for bibliometric analysis is a combination of databases. The most popular research topics on PJI focused on alpha-defensin, antibiotic use, risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections, and the location of prosthetic hip and knee infection. Alpha-defensin appears to be a reliable tool for the diagnosis of PJI.

The effect of bearing surface on risk of periprosthetic joint infection in total hip arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (2) ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Hexter ◽  
S. M. Hislop ◽  
G. W. Blunn ◽  
A. D. Liddle
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Bearing Surface ◽  
Total Hip

Aims Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different bearing surface materials have different surface properties and it has been suggested that the choice of bearing surface may influence the risk of PJI after THA. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the rate of PJI between metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings. Patients and Methods Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for comparative randomized and observational studies that reported the incidence of PJI for different bearing surfaces. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, evaluated risk of bias, and performed data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel–Haenzel method and random-effects model in accordance with methods of the Cochrane group. Results Our search strategy revealed 2272 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. These comprised 11 randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. The overall quality of included studies was high but the observational studies were at high risk of bias due to inadequate adjustment for confounding factors. The overall cumulative incidence of PJI across all studies was 0.78% (1514/193 378). For each bearing combination, the overall incidence was as follows: MoP 0.85% (1353/158 430); CoP 0.38% (67/17 489); and CoC 0.53% (94/17 459). The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the three bearing combinations in terms of risk of PJI. Conclusion On the basis of the clinical studies available, there is no evidence that bearing choice influences the risk of PJI. Future research, including basic science studies and large, adequately controlled registry studies, may be helpful in determining whether implant materials play a role in determining the risk of PJI following arthroplasty surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:134–42.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document