The family impact of dental general anaesthesia in children: A meta‐analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon Soo Park ◽  
Robert P. Anthonappa ◽  
Nigel M. King ◽  
Colman P. McGrath
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Family Impact ◽  
The Family ◽  
Dental General Anaesthesia

The effects of general anaesthesia on oxygen consumption: A meta-analysis guiding future studies on perioperative oxygen transport

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Jakobsson ◽  
Sofia Vadman ◽  
Eva Hagel ◽  
Sigridur Kalman ◽  
Erzsébet Bartha
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Oxygen Transport ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Future Studies

scholarly journals Isolated forearm technique: a meta-analysis of connected consciousness during different general anaesthesia regimens

2018 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Linassi ◽  
P. Zanatta ◽  
P. Tellaroli ◽  
C. Ori ◽  
M. Carron
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Forearm Technique

Can the family drawing be a useful tool for assessing attachment representations in children? A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Cecilia Serena Pace ◽  
Stefania Muzi ◽  
Francesco Madera ◽  
Alessandra Sansò ◽  
Giulio Cesare Zavattini
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Attachment Representations ◽  
The Family

Clinical techniques to prevent cough at emergence from general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis

Airway ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Alex Joseph ◽  
Rajkumar Rajendram
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Co-Operation with Pre-Operative Cardiovascular Monitoring Amongst Children for Chair Dental General Anaesthesia

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Seed ◽  
Charlotte Boardman ◽  
Mark Davies
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Pulse Oximetry ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Pressure Measurement ◽  
Blood Pressure Measurement ◽  
Cardiovascular Monitoring ◽  
Invasive Blood Pressure ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Dental General Anaesthesia ◽  
Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement

INTRODUCTION The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) guidelines Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery state that cardiovascular monitoring for induction of general anaesthesia should include pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure measurement, but recognise that young patients may not co-operate sufficiently to allow this. The aim of this study was to look at levels of compliance possible for pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure measurement, in a population known to be unco-operative with therapeutic interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of 500 records of patients attending for chair dental general anaesthesia was carried out. It was recorded whether pre-operatively pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure measurement had been allowed in addition to the child's age and sex. RESULTS Of the children, 52% were male and 48% were female. The age range was 2–15 years. Overall, 448 children co-operated with both pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure measurement. Co-operation appeared to increase with increasing age. DISCUSSION Of the children, 90% were co-operative with pre-operative monitoring. It could easily be assumed that many of these children, who are referred for general anaesthesia because they are less co-operative than their peers, would not allow proper pre-operative cardiovascular monitoring. This does not appear to be the case. CONCLUSIONS The majority of children, including the very young, attending for chair dental general anaesthesia, will co-operate sufficiently to allow cardiovascular monitoring during induction of anaesthesia, even though the majority will not tolerate exodontia under local anaesthesia.

scholarly journals Effect of stellate ganglion block on postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bei Wen ◽  
Yajie Wang ◽  
Cong Zhang ◽  
Zhijian Fu
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stellate Ganglion ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Stellate Ganglion Block ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Gastrointestinal Function ◽  
Ganglion Block ◽  
Abdominal Bloating

Abstract Background The return of gastrointestinal function is an important sign of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia. We aimed to summarize the effects of stellate ganglion block on the recovery of gastrointestinal function as a means of exploring methods through which anaesthesiologists can contribute to postoperative patient recovery. Methods We performed a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 1988, and November 11, 2019, in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese VIP Information, and the Wanfang and SinoMed databases. Study quality was assessed by using the GRADE criteria and bias of included studies were assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The time to peristaltic sound resumption, flatus, postoperative eating and the incidence of abdominal bloating in the stellate ganglion block and control groups were compared. The control group consisted of either a stellate ganglion block with normal saline or no treatment. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. Results After searching for relevant articles, 281 studies were identified, and five articles with data on 274 patients were eligible. Regarding postoperative flatus time, stellate ganglion block resulted in a mean reduction of 15 h (P = 0.02); then a sensitivity analysis was performed, and the standard mean difference decreased to 6 h (P = 0.007). For gastrointestinal surgery, the mean reduction was 23.92 h (P = 0.0002). As for the evaluation of the recovery of peristaltic sounds, stellate ganglion block promoted the recovery of regular peristaltic bowel sounds an average of 14.67 h earlier than in the control (P = 0.0008). When it comes to nutrients, stellate ganglion block shortened the total parenteral nutrition time by more than 50 h in patients who had undergone gastrointestinal surgery (P<0.00001). Finally, stellate ganglion block prevented the occurrence of postoperative abdominal bloating (P = 0.001).) No complications related to stellate ganglion block were reported. Conclusion Stellate ganglion block may promote postoperative gastrointestinal recovery in patients undergoing various surgeries under general anaesthesia. However, additional trials investigating the use of stellate ganglion block are necessary to confirm our finding. Trial registration This meta-analysis has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42020157602).

scholarly journals Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Schraag ◽  
Lorenzo Pradelli ◽  
Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh ◽  
Marco Bellone ◽  
Gianni Ghetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Meta Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document