Caries lesion prevention and arrestment in approximal surfaces in contact with glass ionomer cement restorations - A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Kerber Tedesco ◽  
Clarissa Calil Bonifácio ◽  
Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo ◽  
Thais Gimenez ◽  
Mariana Minatel Braga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Caries Lesion ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Approximal Surfaces

scholarly journals Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Giselle Aguiar Dias ◽  
Marcela Baraúna Magno ◽  
Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem ◽  
Robson Frederico Cunha ◽  
Lucianne Cople Maia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Is prior conditioning of dentin necessary in restoration with glass-ionomer cement? A systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 102748
Author(s):  
Luiz Eduardo Lucas S. Lopes ◽  
Tamara Kerber Tedesco ◽  
Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo ◽  
José Carlos P Imparato ◽  
Daniela Prócida Raggio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Microleakage of class II restoration with zirconia inlay: An in vitro study

2019 ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho ◽  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Toai Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Group 1 ◽  
Composite Restoration

Background: Class II restoration with zirconia inlay is concerned by numerous studies about the luting coupling between zirconia inlay and teeth. The present study was performed to evaluate the microleakage of Class II zirconia inlayusing two different luting agents and compare to direct restoration using bulk fill composite. Aims: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II restorations using three different techniques. Materials and methods: The study was performed in laboratory with three groups. Each of thirty extracted human teeth was prepared a class II cavity with the same dimensions, then these teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups restored by 3 different approaches. Group 1: zirconia inlay cemented with self-etch resin cement (Multilink N); Group 2: zirconia inlay cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Plus); Group 3: direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite(Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill). All restorations were subjected to thermal cycling (100 cycles 50C – 55 0C), then immersed to 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage determined by the extent of dye penetration along the gingival wall was assessed using two methods: quantitative and semi-quantitative method. Results: Among three types of restorations, group 1 demonstrated the significantly lower rate of leakage compared to the others, while group 2 and 3 showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Zirconia inlay restoration cemented with self-etch resin cement has least microleakage degree when compare to class II zirconia inlay restoration cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite. Key words: inlay, zirconia ceramic, class II restoration, microleakage.

Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Type IX GIC:An Invitro Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Nagalakshmi Chowdhary ◽  
N. K. Kiran ◽  
A. Lakshmi Priya ◽  
Rajashekar Reddy ◽  
Arvind Sridhara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document