scholarly journals Effects of online stigma‐reduction programme for people experiencing mental health conditions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong‐Shian Goh ◽  
Qing Yun Jenna Ow Yong ◽  
Wai‐San Wilson Tam
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Stigma Reduction ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

scholarly journals Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for reducing mental health conditions in employees: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e0189904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Stratton ◽  
Amit Lampit ◽  
Isabella Choi ◽  
Rafael A. Calvo ◽  
Samuel B. Harvey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

scholarly journals A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Lyons ◽  
Chris Cooper ◽  
Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Support Groups ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background Peer support is being integrated within mental health services to further the development of a recovery approach. However, the most effective models and formats of intervention delivery are unknown. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of peer support for improving outcomes for people with lived experience of mental health conditions, when delivered as group interventions. Methods Studies reporting randomised controlled trials of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions were identified by searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL, from inception until July 12th 2019 and undertaking supplementary searches. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias and meta-analyses were conducted if three or more trials provided usable data. Results Eight trials met eligibility criteria, providing data from 2131 participants. Six trials had either high or unclear risk of bias. Interventions were categorised as mutual support groups, or peer support groups, sub-categorised as anti-stigma or self-management interventions. Meta-analyses were only possible for peer support groups and five outcomes. We found evidence that group peer support may make small improvements to overall recovery but not hope or empowerment individually, or to clinical symptoms. Evidence for effectiveness for outcomes which could not be meta-analysed was mixed. Conclusions Findings from the few eligible trials suggest group peer support interventions may be specifically effective for supporting personal recovery and have a limited impact on other outcomes, though there were some risks of bias to study findings. Interventions were heterogeneous and most social outcomes were absent in the literature, highlighting further limitations to the current evidence-base. There is insufficient evidence available from trials of group peer support torecommend the routine implementation of these interventions across mainstream mental health services at present. More high-quality trials of peer-developed, group peer support interventions are needed in order tomake firm conclusions about intervention effectiveness.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of vocational interventions for gaining paid work for people living with mild to moderate mental health conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e039699
Author(s):  
Joanna K Fadyl ◽  
David Anstiss ◽  
Kirk Reed ◽  
Mariya Khoronzhevych ◽  
William M M Levack
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vocational Rehabilitation ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Competitive Employment ◽  
Paid Work ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Quality Evidence

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of vocational interventions to help people living with mild to moderate mental health conditions gain paid work.MethodsSystematic review of international, peer-reviewed literature. Development of the prepublished protocol and search strategy was done in consultation with stakeholder reference groups consisting of people with lived experience of long-term conditions, advocates and clinicians. We searched academic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, AMED, CINAHL, Proquest Dissertations and Theses database, and Business Source Complete for controlled trials comparing a specific vocational intervention against a control intervention or usual care, published between 1 January 2004 and 1 August 2019. Two authors independently screened search results, extracted data and appraised studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.ResultsEleven studies met inclusion criteria. Seven studies investigated Individual Placement and Support (IPS) modified for people who were not in intensive mental health treatment services. These studies occurred settings such as community vocational rehabilitation services, a housing programme and community mental health services. The studies provided very low quality evidence that people who receive IPS-style vocational rehabilitation are more likely to gain competitive employment than people who receive usual care (risk ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.34, seven studies, 1611 participants). The remaining four studies considered cognitive behavioural therapy or specific vocational rehabilitation interventions designed to fit a unique context. There was insufficient evidence from these studies to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of non-IPS forms of vocational rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate mental health conditions.DiscussionThe meta-analysis showed a clear intervention effect but low precision, and more high-quality studies are needed in this field. There is currently very low quality evidence that IPS-style intervention results in more participants in competitive employment compared with ‘usual care’ control groups in populations with mild to moderate mental health conditions.

scholarly journals Systematic review of healthcare costs related to mental health conditions among cancer survivors

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya S. Khushalani ◽  
Jin Qin ◽  
John Cyrus ◽  
Natasha Buchanan Lunsford ◽  
Sun Hee Rim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

scholarly journals ‘Global mental health’: systematic review of the term and its implicit priorities

BJPsych Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya Misra ◽  
Anne Stevenson ◽  
Emily E. Haroz ◽  
Victoria de Menil ◽  
Karestan C. Koenen
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Global Mental Health ◽  
Contextual Information ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Sub Saharan

Background The term ‘global mental health’ came to the fore in 2007, when the Lancet published a series by that name. Aims To review all peer-reviewed articles using the term ‘global mental health’ and determine the implicit priorities of scientific literature that self-identifies with this term. Method We conducted a systematic review to quantify all peer-reviewed articles using the English term ‘global mental health’ in their text published between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016, including by geographic regions and by mental health conditions. Results A total of 467 articles met criteria. Use of the term ‘global mental health’ increased from 12 articles in 2007 to 114 articles in 2016. For the 111 empirical studies (23.8% of articles), the majority (78.4%) took place in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with the most in Sub-Saharan Africa (28.4%) and South Asia (25.5%) and none from Central Asia. The most commonly studied mental health conditions were depression (29.7%), psychoses (12.6%) and conditions specifically related to stress (12.6%), with fewer studies on epilepsy (2.7%), self-harm and suicide (1.8%) and dementia (0.9%). The majority of studies lacked contextual information, including specific region(s) within countries where studies took place (20.7% missing), specific language(s) in which studies were conducted (36.9% missing), and details on ethnic identities such as ethnicity, caste and/or tribe (79.6% missing) and on socioeconomic status (85.4% missing). Conclusions Research identifying itself as ‘global mental health’ has focused predominantly on depression in LMICs and lacked contextual and sociodemographic data that limit interpretation and application of findings. Declaration of interest None.

scholarly journals UT3 The Validity Of The EQ-5D, SF-6D, SF-36 and SF-12 In Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Review

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A239
Author(s):  
D. Papaioannou ◽  
T. Peasgood ◽  
J. Brazier ◽  
G. Parry
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Sf 36
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document