scholarly journals Safety and mid‐term surgical results of anterior urethroplasty with the tissue‐engineered oral mucosa graft MukoCell ® : A single‐center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonidas Karapanos ◽  
Ilgar Akbarov ◽  
Vahudin Zugor ◽  
Ruud Kokx ◽  
Anna Hagemeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Mucosa ◽  
Surgical Results ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Oral Mucosa Graft

scholarly journals Comparison of the patient’s satisfaction underwent penile prosthesis; Malleable versus Ambicor: Single center experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Omer Bayrak ◽  
Sakip Erturhan ◽  
Ilker Seckiner ◽  
Mehmet Ozturk ◽  
Haluk Sen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Satisfaction ◽  
Penile Prosthesis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Surgical Results ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Medical Systems ◽  
Prosthesis Implantation ◽  
Patient’S Satisfaction ◽  
Single Center Experience

Objective: To compare the surgical results, complications, and satisfaction levels of patients who underwent malleable penile prosthesis implantation (M-PPI) and Ambicor penile prosthesis implantation (A-PPI). Material and methods: One hundred forty two patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation [M-PPI (Promedon- Tube®, Cordoba, Argentina): 81, and A-PPI (American Medical Systems, Minnesota, USA): 61] between 2013-2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients’ age, body mass index, smoking history, etiological factors, modified “Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire” scores, shortening of the penis, and complications were recorded. Results: The patients who performed A-PPI implantation were younger (56.27 ± 10.81 vs. 51.47 ± 11.79, p = 0.009). The EDITS scores of 31(38.2%) patients who underwent M-PPI and 44 (72.4%) patients who underwent A-PPI were available. It was observed that the scores on the following questions were statistical significantly higher in the A-PPI group: “Overall, are you satisfied with your penile prosthesis?, How much of your expectations did penile prosthesis meet?, How often do you use your penile prosthesis?” (p = 0.05, p = 0.048, p = 0.038). No difference was observed between the groups in terms of the scores on the other three questions (p = 0.447, p = 0.326, p = 0.365). A 61.3% of patients in MPPI (19/31) group, and 56.8% of patients in A-PPI (25/44) group stated penile shortening (p = 0.417). Mean shortening was reported as 2.1 ± 0.45 cm, and 2.12 ± 0.52 cm, in M-PPI and A-PPI groups, respectively (p = 0.90). Conclusion:It is remarkable that the patients who underwent A-PPI experienced higher satisfaction with their prosthesis. Even though it has not been evidenced in the current literature data, patients who have had either M-PPI or A-PPI should be informed about the risk of penile shortening.

Surgical results in penile fracture: Our single center experience

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Kursat Yilmazel ◽  
Emre Sam ◽  
Mehmet Sefa Altay ◽  
Ahmet Emre Cinislioglu ◽  
Emel Sam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Results ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Penile Fracture ◽  
Single Center Experience

scholarly journals Treatment of Meatal Strictures by Dorsal Inlay Oral Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty: A Single-Center Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4312
Author(s):  
Michel Wirtz ◽  
Wietse Claeys ◽  
Philippe Francois ◽  
Marjan Waterloos ◽  
Mieke Waterschoot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Mucosa ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Buccal Mucosal Graft ◽  
Stricture Recurrence ◽  
Oral Mucosa Graft

Background: To report on the use of oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for meatal strictures using the dorsal inlay technique. Methods: Patients who underwent a single-stage dorsal inlay oral mucosal graft urethroplasty between January 2000 and May 2021 were included in this study. A follow-up of a minimum of 12 months was necessary for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were stricture extension into the penile urethra, concomitant stricture at another location, flap urethroplasty for a meatal stricture, dorsal inlay urethroplasty with another type of graft, ventral onlay graft urethroplasty or staged urethroplasty. Recurrence was defined by the inability to pass a 14F metal sound through the reconstructed meatus irrespective of patients’ complaints. Results: Our study cohort included 40 patients. Buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty was used in 25 patients and 15 patients were treated with the aid of lingual mucosal graft (LMG). The median follow-up was 85 (IQR: 69–110) months. Seven (17.5%) patients suffered a stricture recurrence of which four (10%) needed re-intervention. The median 5-y recurrent free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort was 85 (±6)%. The median 5-y RFS was 96 (±4)% versus 65 (±13)% for respectively BMG and LMG (p = 0.03). Post-operative complications were identified in 11 (27.5%) patients with only one (2.5%) patient who had a grade 3a complication. Conclusions: Dorsal inlay oral mucosa graft urethroplasty is a safe and feasible technique for selected patients with meatal stenosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document