Influence of body mass index on oncological outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Ye Liu ◽  
Yong-Hong Li ◽  
Zhou-Wei Liu ◽  
Zhi-Ling Zhang ◽  
Yun-Lin Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Radical Nephroureterectomy ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

scholarly journals Modified transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: Best practice in a single center with updated results

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052092878
Author(s):  
Kun Ye ◽  
Zhaohui Zhong ◽  
Liang Zhu ◽  
Jiannan Ren ◽  
Ming Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Radical Nephroureterectomy ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Objective Radical nephroureterectomy remains the gold standard for the surgical treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Based on previous research, we prospectively compared the advantages of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (TLNU) with a three-port technique in a single position versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (RLNU). Methods We evaluated 48 patients diagnosed with UTUC at our institution from January 2015 to October 2019. The patients underwent either TLNU (n = 24) or RLNU (n = 24). We randomly assigned the patients to each technique group based on their body mass index because our experience has shown that the body mass index is the main interfering factor for this surgery. The baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Results We found no significant differences in the baseline characteristics, time until recovery of intestinal function, or postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. However, the TLNU group had a shorter operation time and better postoperative pain control than the RLNU group. Conclusion Modified TLNU is associated with a shorter operative time and less severe postoperative pain compared with RLNU. Both techniques are safe and reliable with adequate management, and their therapeutic effects are comparable in other aspects.

scholarly journals Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Heon Kim ◽  
Chung Un Lee ◽  
Minyong Kang ◽  
Hwang Gyun Jeon ◽  
Byong Chang Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Radical Nephroureterectomy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Segmental Ureterectomy ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

AbstractThis study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.

scholarly journals Combination of pembrolizumab and BCG treatment after endoscopic ablation of high-risk superficial upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in patients not candidates for radical nephroureterectomy: protocol for phase-II study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e027066
Author(s):  
Marcus L Jamil ◽  
Mustafa Deebajah ◽  
Akshay Sood ◽  
Shaheen Alanee
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Radical Nephroureterectomy ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Muscle Invasive ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

IntroductionThe treatment standard for high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) is radical nephroureterectomy. However, some patients may be unfit or unwilling, and in such patients the available alternatives are suboptimal. Therapies targeting the programmed death (PD) pathway have shown promise in urothelial carcinom (UC). We designed the current study to determine the safety and efficacy of administering MK-3475 (a monoclonal antibody targeting interaction between PD-1 and its ligand) in combination with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in high-risk non-muscle invasive UUTUC patients.MethodsThis represents a single-centre phase-II efficacy study of MK-3475 therapy in combination with BCG for subjects, 18 years of age or older, with pathologically documented non-muscle invasive high-risk UUTUC unfit or unwilling to be treated with radical nephroureterectomy. Twenty subjects will be enrolled; patients will receive treatment with 200 mg of MK-3475 every 21 days, starting 2 weeks from the initial endoscopic resection and continuing for 6 weeks after the final dose of BCG. The primary objective is to determine the safety and efficacy of administering MK-3475 at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks in conjunction with intrapelvic BCG. Secondary objectives include 19 week and the 3, 12 and 24-month post-treatment completion complete response and progression-free rate assessments.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Henry Ford Hospital. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a scientific conference.Trial registration numberNCT03345134

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document