Exploring family participation in patient care on acute care wards: A mixed‐methods study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Mackie ◽  
Andrea P. Marshall ◽  
Marion L. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Family Participation

The Environmental Services Perspective on Hospital Room Design: A Mixed-Methods Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Patterson ◽  
Elizabeth Sanders ◽  
Carolyn M. Sommerich ◽  
Kevin D. Evans ◽  
Steven A. Lavender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Environmental Services ◽  
Healthcare Staff ◽  
Design Features ◽  
Mixed Methods Approach ◽  
Room Size ◽  
Room Design

Our aim is to enhance the safety and efficiency of all healthcare staff by designing patient rooms that meet the physical and cognitive needs of those providing direct and indirect patient care in hospital settings. A mixed-methods study was employed, where findings were compiled from twenty-six environmental services personnel across study activities. The insights were grouped into six categories of challenges with the design of hospital rooms in acute care settings: room cleaning, bathroom, room size, furniture, communication, and a miscellaneous ‘other’ category. There are design implications for storage, room design features, locations of room items, and fabrics and finishes.

scholarly journals Perceptions and acceptability of mHealth interventions for improving patient care at a community-based HIV/AIDS clinic in Uganda: A mixed methods study

AIDS Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 874-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry W. Chang ◽  
Veronica Njie-Carr ◽  
Sheila Kalenge ◽  
Jack F. Kelly ◽  
Robert C. Bollinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Improving Patient Care ◽  
Hiv Aids

scholarly journals Policies and strategies to retain and support the return of experienced GPs in direct patient care: the ReGROUP mixed-methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (14) ◽  
pp. 1-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L Campbell ◽  
Emily Fletcher ◽  
Gary Abel ◽  
Rob Anderson ◽  
Rupatharshini Chilvers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
At Risk ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
South West ◽  
Career Break ◽  
South West England

BackgroundUK general practice faces a workforce crisis, with general practitioner (GP) shortages, organisational change, substantial pressures across the whole health-care system and an ageing population with increasingly complex health needs. GPs require lengthy training, so retaining the existing workforce is urgent and important.Objectives(1) To identify the key policies and strategies that might (i) facilitate the retention of experienced GPs in direct patient care or (ii) support the return of GPs following a career break. (2) To consider the feasibility of potentially implementing those policies and strategies.DesignThis was a comprehensive, mixed-methods study.SettingThis study took place in primary care in England.ParticipantsGeneral practitioners registered in south-west England were surveyed. Interviews were with purposively selected GPs and primary care stakeholders. A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) panel comprised GP partners and GPs working in national stakeholder organisations. Stakeholder consultations included representatives from regional and national groups.Main outcome measuresSystematic review – factors affecting GPs’ decisions to quit and to take career breaks. Survey – proportion of GPs likely to quit, to take career breaks or to reduce hours spent in patient care within 5 years of being surveyed. Interviews – themes relating to GPs’ decision-making. RAM – a set of policies and strategies to support retention, assessed as ‘appropriate’ and ‘feasible’. Predictive risk modelling – predictive model to identify practices in south-west England at risk of workforce undersupply within 5 years. Stakeholder consultation – comments and key actions regarding implementing emergent policies and strategies from the research.ResultsPast research identified four job-related ‘push’ factors associated with leaving general practice: (1) workload, (2) job dissatisfaction, (3) work-related stress and (4) work–life balance. The survey, returned by 2248 out of 3370 GPs (67%) in the south-west of England, identified a high likelihood of quitting (37%), taking a career break (36%) or reducing hours (57%) within 5 years. Interviews highlighted three drivers of leaving general practice: (1) professional identity and value of the GP role, (2) fear and risk associated with service delivery and (3) career choices. The RAM panel deemed 24 out of 54 retention policies and strategies to be ‘appropriate’, with most also considered ‘feasible’, including identification of and targeted support for practices ‘at risk’ of workforce undersupply and the provision of formal career options for GPs wishing to undertake portfolio roles. Practices at highest risk of workforce undersupply within 5 years are those that have larger patient list sizes, employ more nurses, serve more deprived and younger populations, or have poor patient experience ratings. Actions for national organisations with an interest in workforce planning were identified. These included collection of data on the current scope of GPs’ portfolio roles, and the need for formal career pathways for key primary care professionals, such as practice managers.LimitationsThe survey, qualitative research and modelling were conducted in one UK region. The research took place within a rapidly changing policy environment, providing a challenge in informing emergent policy and practice.ConclusionsThis research identifies the basis for current concerns regarding UK GP workforce capacity, drawing on experiences in south-west England. Policies and strategies identified by expert stakeholders after considering these findings are likely to be of relevance in addressing GP retention in the UK. Collaborative, multidisciplinary research partnerships should investigate the effects of rolling out some of the policies and strategies described in this report.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016033876 and UKCRN ID number 20700.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

scholarly journals The Role of Gender in Nurse-Resident Interactions: A Mixed-methods Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-930
Author(s):  
Emily Cleveland Manchanda ◽  
Anita Chary ◽  
Noor Zanial ◽  
Lauren Nadeau ◽  
Jennifer Verstreken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Gender Bias ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Interprofessional Communication ◽  
Hospital Leadership

Introduction: The role of gender in interprofessional interactions is poorly understood. This mixed-methods study explored perceptions of gender bias in interactions between emergency medicine (EM) residents and nurses. Methods: We analyzed qualitative interviews and focus groups with residents and nurses from two hospitals for dominant themes. An electronic survey, developed through an inductive-deductive approach informed by qualitative data, was administered to EM residents and nurses. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and between-group comparisons. Results: Six nurses and 14 residents participated in interviews and focus groups. Key qualitative themes included gender differences in interprofessional communication, specific examples of, and responses to, gender bias. Female nurses perceived female residents as more approachable and collaborative than male residents, while female residents perceived nurses’ questions as doubting their clinical judgment. A total of 134 individuals (32%) completed the survey. Females more frequently perceived interprofessional gender bias (mean 30.9; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 25.6, 36.2; vs 17.6 [95% CI, 10.3, 24.9). Residents reported witnessing interprofessional gender bias more frequently than nurses (58.7 (95% CI, 48.6, 68.7 vs 23.9 (95% CI, 19.4, 28.4). Residents reported that gender bias affected job satisfaction (P = 0.002), patient care (P = 0.001), wellness (P = 0.003), burnout (P = 0.002), and self-doubt (P = 0.017) more frequently than nurses. Conclusion: Perceived interprofessional gender bias negatively impacts personal wellbeing and workplace satisfaction, particularly among female residents. Key institutional stakeholders including residency, nursing, and hospital leadership should invest the resources necessary to develop and integrate evidence-based strategies to improve interprofessional relationships that will ultimately enhance residency training, work climate, and patient care.

scholarly journals Infection control link nurse programs in Dutch acute care hospitals; a mixed-methods study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireille Dekker ◽  
Rosa van Mansfeld ◽  
Christina Vandenbroucke-Grauls ◽  
Martine de Bruijne ◽  
Irene Jongerden
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Mixed Methods Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document