Notions of quality and standards for qualitative research reporting

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Pearson ◽  
Zoe Jordan ◽  
Craig Lockwood ◽  
Ed Aromataris
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Research Reporting

scholarly journals Management and Organization Review Special Issue ‘Doing Qualitative Research in Emerging Markets’

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki ◽  
Tian Wei ◽  
Carol Hsu ◽  
Catherine Cassell ◽  
Shameen Prashantham
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Qualitative Research Methods ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Research Reporting ◽  
New Phenomena

The Management and Organization Review (MOR) special issue on ‘Doing Qualitative Research in Emerging Markets’ aims to advance the quality, diversity, and understanding of qualitative research methods in management in the context of emerging markets. The value of qualitative research is increasingly embraced by management scholars thanks to its merits for building new theories and testing existing ones, as well as exemplifying new phenomena by surfacing contextual idiosyncrasies (Bansal & Corley, 2011; Birkinshaw, Brannen, & Tang, 2011; Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007; Rynes, 2007; Welch, Piekkari, Plakoyiannaki, & Paavilainen-Mantymaki, 2011). As Bansal and Corley (2011: 234) suggest ‘The beauty of qualitative research is that it accommodates different paradigms and different styles of research and research reporting. Although there are merits to having norms emerge for the style of qualitative research manuscripts, we do not want to stifle creativity’.

Challenges of Qualitative Inquiry and the Need for Follow-Up in Descriptive Science

1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Present Article ◽  
Common Core ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Qualitative Inquiry ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Research Reporting ◽  
Rational Consensus

AbstractThe present article explores problems of descriptive reporting, relativism, and the lack of systematic follow-up of qualitative research. Such issues are discussed in relation to components of phenomenologically based research reports, with emphasis on the articulation of the research approach, and steps to facilitate validation. The value of a descriptive science derived from phenomenological principles is discussed as forming a common ground for initial qualitative inquiry, while providing a critically reflective base upon which rational consensus can be developed. I suggest that the values of follow-up, tentativeness, and humility in research reporting, and a rational framework of critical validation, constitute a common core of science. In addition, phenomenological tenets are discussed as providing a corrective to the uncritical search for absolutes, or the "anything counts" conception of relativistic movements.

scholarly journals Management and Organization Review Special Issue ‘Doing Qualitative Research in Emerging Markets

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-208
Author(s):  
Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki ◽  
Tian Wei ◽  
Carol Hsu ◽  
Catherine Cassell ◽  
Shameen Prashantham
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Qualitative Research Methods ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Research Reporting ◽  
New Phenomena

The Management and Organization Review (MOR) special issue on ‘Doing Qualitative Research in Emerging Markets’ aims to advance the quality, diversity, and understanding of qualitative research methods in management in the context of emerging markets. The value of qualitative research is increasingly embraced by management scholars thanks to its merits for building new theories and testing existing ones, as well as exemplifying new phenomena by surfacing contextual idiosyncrasies (Bansal & Corley, 2011; Birkinshaw, Brannen, & Tang, 2011; Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007; Rynes, 2007; Welch, Piekkari, Plakoyiannaki, & Paavilainen-Mantymaki, 2011). As Bansal and Corley (2011: 234) suggest ‘The beauty of qualitative research is that it accommodates different paradigms and different styles of research and research reporting. Although there are merits to having norms emerge for the style of qualitative research manuscripts, we do not want to stifle creativity’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document