Clinical performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer Mindray BC‐6000

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 622-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yimin Shen ◽  
Jun Cao ◽  
Zhiying Zhou ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Yili Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Hematology Analyzer

scholarly journals Clinical performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in point of care usage in comparison to RT-qPCR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabell Wagenhaeuser ◽  
Kerstin Knies ◽  
Vera Rauschenberger ◽  
Michael Eisenmann ◽  
Miriam McDonogh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Protein Variant ◽  
Atypical Symptoms

Background Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 are fast, broadly available, and inexpensive. Despite this, reliable clinical performance data is sparse. Methods In a prospective performance evaluation study, RDT from three manufacturers (NADAL, Panbio, MEDsan) were compared to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in 5 068 oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital setting. Viral load was derived from standardized RT-qPCR Cycle threshold (Ct) values. The data collection period ranged from November 12, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Findings Overall, sensitivity of RDT compared to RT-qPCR was 42.57% (95% CI 33.38%-52.31%), and specificity 99.68% (95% CI 99.48%-99.80%). Sensitivity declined with decreasing viral load from 100% in samples with a deduced viral load of 10^8 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per ml to 8.82% in samples with a viral load lower than 104 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per ml. No significant differences in sensitivity or specificity could be observed between the three manufacturers, or between samples with and without spike protein variant B.1.1.7. The NPV in the study cohort was 98.84%; the PPV in persons with typical COVID-19 symptoms was 97.37%, and 28.57% in persons without or with atypical symptoms. Interpretation RDT are a reliable method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons with high viral load. RDT are a valuable addition to RT-qPCR testing, as they reliably detect infectious persons with high viral loads before RT-qPCR results are available. Funding German Federal Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF), Free State of Bavaria

Clinical Performance Evaluation of Feces Analyzer KU-F10

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (02/2021) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingjuan Shi ◽  
Shaoqing Ju ◽  
Fang Bao ◽  
Hui Cong
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Performance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document