Automated separation of tail fraction for fruit distillates by means of in‐line conductivity measurement

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 3484-3492
Author(s):  
Andreas Liebminger ◽  
Markus Holstein ◽  
Volker Dietrich ◽  
Manfred Goessinger
Keyword(s):  
Conductivity Measurement ◽  
Automated Separation

Analysis of significant measures for thermal conductivity

2020 ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Yuri P. Zarichnyak ◽  
Vyacheslav P. Khodunkov
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Flux Density ◽  
Measurement Method ◽  
Conductivity Measurement ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Measuring Instrument ◽  
New Class ◽  
Achievable Accuracy

The analysis of a new class of measuring instrument for heat quantities based on the use of multi-valued measures of heat conductivity of solids. For example, measuring thermal conductivity of solids shown the fallacy of the proposed approach and the illegality of the use of the principle of ambiguity to intensive thermal quantities. As a proof of the error of the approach, the relations for the thermal conductivities of the component elements of a heat pump that implements a multi-valued measure of thermal conductivity are given, and the limiting cases are considered. In two ways, it is established that the thermal conductivity of the specified measure does not depend on the value of the supplied heat flow. It is shown that the declared accuracy of the thermal conductivity measurement method does not correspond to the actual achievable accuracy values and the standard for the unit of surface heat flux density GET 172-2016. The estimation of the currently achievable accuracy of measuring the thermal conductivity of solids is given. The directions of further research and possible solutions to the problem are given.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document