Evaluation of candidal colonization and specific humoral responses againstCandida albicansin patients with psoriasis

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. e555-e560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Taheri Sarvtin ◽  
Tahereh Shokohi ◽  
Zohreh Hajheydari ◽  
Jamshid Yazdani ◽  
Mohammad T. Hedayati
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghaffari Javad ◽  
Mehdi Taheri Sarvtin ◽  
Mohammad Taghi Hedayati ◽  
Zohreh Hajheydari ◽  
Jamshid Yazdani ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to assess the candidal colonization and specific humoral responses againstCandida albicansin patients with atopic dermatitis. One hundred patients with atopic dermatitis and 50 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. Skin and oral specimens from all participants were cultured on CHROMagarCandidamedium. Isolated yeasts were identified by using the sequence of the D1/D2 domain of the 26S rRNA gene. ELISA was used for detection of IgM, IgA, and IgG antibodies againstC. albicansin sera of participants.Candidaspecies were isolated from the skin and oral cavity of 31% of the patients and 12% of the controls. There was no significant difference betweenCandidacolonization in patients and controls (P>0.05).Candida albicanswas isolated from the skin and oral cavity of 23% of the patients and 6% of the controls (P< 0.05). There were no significant differences between serum levels of IgM and IgA in patients and controls (P>0.05). Serum level of IgG was significantly lower in patients than in controls (P<0.05). Type ofCandidacolonization can change in patients with atopic dermatitis. In addition, these patients have abnormalities in the production of antibodies againstCandida albicansthat may have a role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis.Corrigendum to “Evaluation ofCandidaColonization and Specific Humoral Responses againstCandida albicansin Patients with Atopic Dermatitis”


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-324
Author(s):  
Manica Negahdaripour ◽  
Navid Nezafat ◽  
Reza Heidari ◽  
Nasrollah Erfani ◽  
Nasim Hajighahramani ◽  
...  

Background: L2-based Human Papillomavirus (HPV) prophylactic vaccines, containing epitopes from HPV minor capsid proteins, are under investigation as second-generation HPV vaccines. No such vaccine has passed clinical trials yet, mainly due to the low immunogenicity of peptide vaccines; so efforts are being continued. A candidate vaccine composed of two HPV16 L2 epitopes, flagellin and a Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 4 agonist (RS09) as adjuvants, and two universal T-helper epitopes was designed in silico in our previous researches. Methods: The designed vaccine construct was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) and purified through metal affinity chromatography. Following mice vaccination, blood samples underwent ELISA and flow cytometry analyses for the detection of IgG and seven Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Results: Following immunization, Th1 (IFN-γ, IL-2) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10) type cytokines, as well as IgG, were induced significantly compared with the PBS group. Significant increases in IFN-γ, IL-2, and IL-5 levels were observed in the vaccinated group versus Freund’s adjuvant group. Conclusion: The obtained cytokine induction profile implied both cellular and humoral responses, with a more Th-1 favored trend. However, an analysis of specific antibodies against L2 is required to confirm humoral responses. No significant elevation in inflammatory cytokines, (IL-6 and TNF-α), suggested a lack of unwanted inflammatory side effects despite using a combination of two TLR agonists. The designed construct might be capable of inducing adaptive and innate immunity; nevertheless, comprehensive immune tests were not conducted at this stage and will be a matter of future work.


Author(s):  
Manuela Mauro ◽  
Vinicius Queiroz ◽  
Vincenzo Arizza ◽  
Daniela Campobello ◽  
Márcio Reis Custódio ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Oliver Scourfield ◽  
Sophie G Reed ◽  
Max Quastel ◽  
Jennifer Alderson ◽  
Valentina M T Bart ◽  
...  

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 has generated a rapidly evolving field of research, with the global scientific community striving for solutions to the current pandemic. Characterizing humoral responses towards SARS-CoV-2, as well as closely related strains, will help determine whether antibodies are central to infection control, and aid the design of therapeutics and vaccine candidates. This review outlines the major aspects of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody research to date, with a focus on the various prophylactic and therapeutic uses of antibodies to alleviate disease in addition to the potential of cross-reactive therapies and the implications of long-term immunity.


Author(s):  
Jack Arnold ◽  
Kevin Winthrop ◽  
Paul Emery

Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination will be the largest vaccination programme in the history of the NHS. Patients on immunosuppressive therapy will be among the earliest to be vaccinated. Some evidence indicates immunosuppressive therapy inhibits humoral response to the influenza, pneumococcal and hepatitis B vaccines. The degree to which this will translate to impaired COVID-19 vaccine responses is unclear. Other evidence suggests withholding MTX for 2 weeks post-vaccination may improve responses. Rituximab has been shown to impair humoral responses for 6 months or longer post-administration. Decisions on withholding or interrupting immunosuppressive therapy around COVID-19 vaccination will need to be made prior to the availability of data on specific COVID-19 vaccine response in these patients. With this in mind, this article outlines the existing data on the effect of antirheumatic therapy on vaccine responses in patients with inflammatory arthritis and formulates a possible pragmatic management strategy for COVID-19 vaccination.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document