scholarly journals Low value Injury Care in the Adult Orthopaedic Trauma Population: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélanie Bérubé ◽  
Lynne Moore ◽  
Pierre‐Alexandre Tardif ◽  
Gregory Berry ◽  
Étienne Belzile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Trauma Population

Cost-utility analysis in orthopaedic trauma; what pays? A systematic review

Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Coyle ◽  
S. Kinsella ◽  
B. Lenehan ◽  
J.M. Queally
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Cost Utility Analysis ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Utility Analysis

scholarly journals Measures of central sensitisation and their measurement properties in the adult musculoskeletal trauma population: a protocol for a systematic review and data synthesis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e023204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Middlebrook ◽  
Alison B Rushton ◽  
Nicola R Heneghan ◽  
Deborah Falla
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Health Measurement ◽  
Central Sensitisation ◽  
Trauma Population ◽  
Musculoskeletal Trauma

IntroductionPain following musculoskeletal trauma is common with poor outcomes and disability well documented. Pain is complex in nature and can include the four primary mechanisms of pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, inflammatory and central sensitisation (CS). CS can be measured in multiple ways; however, no systematic review has evaluated the measurement properties of such measures in the musculoskeletal trauma population. This systematic review aims to evaluate the measurement properties of current measures of CS in this population.Methods/analysisThis protocol is informed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-P. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ZETOC, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar as well as key journals and grey literature will be searched in two stages to (1) identify what measures are being used to assess CS in this population and (2) evaluate the measurement properties of the identified measures. Two independent reviewers will conduct the search, extract the data, assess risk of bias for included studies and assess overall quality. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias Checklist and a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be used. Meta-analysis will be conducted if deemed appropriate. Alternatively, a narrative synthesis will be conducted and summarised per measurement property per outcome measure.Ethics and disseminationThis review will aid clinicians in using the most appropriate tool for assessing central sensitisation in this population and is the first step towards a more standardised approach in pain assessment. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer reviewed journal and presented at conferences.PROSPERO registrationnumberCRD42018091531.

Transcutaneous Hemoglobin Screening in an Adult Orthopaedic Trauma Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. e165-e169
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Rascoe ◽  
Michael D. Kavanagh ◽  
Mary A. Breslin ◽  
Emily Hu ◽  
Heather A. Vallier
Keyword(s):  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Trauma Population

scholarly journals The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e0227907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan N. O’Hara ◽  
Marckenley Isaac ◽  
Gerard P. Slobogean ◽  
Niek S. Klazinga
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Socioeconomic Impact ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma

Narcotic Use and Postoperative Doctor Shopping in the Orthopaedic Trauma Population

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (15) ◽  
pp. 1257-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent J. Morris ◽  
Justin W. Zumsteg ◽  
Kristin R. Archer ◽  
Brian Cash ◽  
Hassan R. Mir
Keyword(s):  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Doctor Shopping ◽  
Trauma Population

scholarly journals Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 101674
Author(s):  
Kanthan Theivendran ◽  
Faizan Arshad ◽  
Umar-Khetaab Hanif ◽  
Aleksi Reito ◽  
Xavier Griffin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carbon Fibre ◽  
Trauma Surgery ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Metallic Implants

scholarly journals Endotracheal intubation to reduce aspiration events in acutely comatose patients: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Orso ◽  
Luigi Vetrugno ◽  
Nicola Federici ◽  
Natascia D’Andrea ◽  
Tiziana Bove
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Trauma Population ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Gcs Score ◽  
Risk Of Aspiration

Abstract Background It is customary to believe that a patient with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than or equal to 8 should be intubated to avoid aspiration. We conducted a systematic review to establish if patients with GCS ≤ 8 for trauma or non-traumatic emergencies and treated in the acute care setting (e.g., Emergency Department or Pre-hospital environment) should be intubated to avoid aspiration or aspiration pneumonia/pneumonitis, and consequently, reduce mortality. Methods We searched six databases, Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, SpringerLink, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Emcare, from April 15th to October 14th, 2020, for studies involving low GCS score patients of whom the risk of aspiration and related complications was assessed. Results Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis (7 on non-traumatic population, 4 on trauma population, 1 pediatric and 1 adult mixed case studies). For the non-traumatic cases, two prospective studies and one retrospective study found no difference in aspiration risk between intubated and non-intubated patients. Two retrospective studies reported a reduction in the risk of aspiration in the intubated patient group. For traumatic cases, the study that considered the risk of aspiration did not show any differences between the two groups. A study on adult mixed cases found no difference in the incidence of aspiration among intubated and non-intubated patients. A study on pediatric patients found increased mortality for intubated versus non-intubated non-traumatic patients with a low GCS score. Conclusion Whether intubation results in a reduction in the incidence of aspiration events and whether these are more frequent in patients with low GCS scores are not yet established. The paucity of evidence on this topic makes clinical trials justifiable and necessary. Trial registration Prospero registration number: CRD42020136987.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Diagnostic Evaluation of Postoperative Fever in an Orthopaedic Trauma Population

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 558-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Petretta ◽  
Mark McConkey ◽  
Gerard P. Slobogean ◽  
James Handel ◽  
Henry M. Broekhuyse
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Diagnostic Evaluation ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Postoperative Fever ◽  
Trauma Population ◽  
Incidence Risk

An assessment of the inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status score in the orthopaedic trauma population

Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rivka C. Ihejirika ◽  
Rachel V. Thakore ◽  
Vasanth Sathiyakumar ◽  
Jesse M. Ehrenfeld ◽  
William T. Obremskey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Status Score ◽  
Trauma Population

scholarly journals What Are the Applications and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Fracture Detection and Classification in Orthopaedic Trauma Imaging? A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 477 (11) ◽  
pp. 2482-2491 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. G. Langerhuizen ◽  
Stein J. Janssen ◽  
Wouter H. Mallee ◽  
Michel P.J. van den Bekerom ◽  
David Ring ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Fracture Detection ◽  
Trauma Imaging
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document