scholarly journals Effectiveness of mono antiplatelet therapy vs dual antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack—Special subgroup consideration for the African‐American Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amne Borghol ◽  
Ifeanyi Onor ◽  
Alison Neuliep ◽  
Ahmed Zaki ◽  
Gabriela Andonie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
African American ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
American Population ◽  
African American Population ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Special Subgroup

scholarly journals Antiplatelet Use and Ischemic Stroke Risk in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Post Hoc Analysis of the POINT Trial

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Anadani ◽  
Adam de Havenon ◽  
Nils Henninger ◽  
Lindsey Kuohn ◽  
Brian Mac Grory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Stroke Risk ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
Post Hoc

Background and Purpose: Dual antiplatelet therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. However, whether the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy is modified by pretreatment antiplatelet status is unclear. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the POINT trial (Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on pretreatment antiplatelet use. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke within 90 days of randomization. Results: We included 4881 patients of whom 41% belonged to the no pretreatment antiplatelet. Ischemic stroke occurred in 6% and 5% in the antiplatelet pretreatment and no antiplatelet pretreatment, respectively. Antiplatelet pretreatment was not associated with the risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.81–137]) or risk of major hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.55–2.21]; P =0.794). The effect of dual antiplatelet therapy on recurrent ischemic stroke risk was not different in patients who were on antiplatelet before randomization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50–0.94]) as opposed to those who were not (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.50–1.12]), P for interaction = 0.685. Conclusions: In patients with minor stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack, dual antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of ischemic stroke regardless of premorbid antiplatelet use.

scholarly journals RETRACTED ARTICLE: Dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy for acute non- cardio embolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, an efficacy and safety analysis - updated meta-analysis

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christessa Emille Que Albay ◽  
Frederick Gavril D. Leyson ◽  
Federick C. Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Abstract Background New evidence on the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention have been realized in the recent years. An updated meta analysis was done to determine the effect of the various dual antiplatelets vs aspirin alone on recurrence rate of ischemic stroke, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and its safety profile as reported through major bleeding. Methods PubMed, Cochrane and Science Direct data bases were utilized, RCTs evaluating dual antiplatelet vs mono antiplatelet therapy for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack within < 72 h from ictus were searched up to July 2019. Risk ratio at 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate stroke recurrence, cardiac events and mortality, and major bleeding. Results Sixteen randomized controlled trials with a population of 28, 032 patients were pooled into a meta-analysis. Dual antiplatelet therapy was significantly superior over mono antiplatelet therapy in the reduction of stroke (RR 0.75, 95% CI:0.68–0.83, p value< 0.00001) and composite events namely cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (0.73 95% CI: 0.65–0.82, p value < 0.00001), while bleeding events were noted to be not significant (1.22 95% CI: 0.87–1.70, p value = 0.25). Conclusion In acute non-cardioembolic ischemic strokes or those who have suffered a transient ischemic attack, dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with efficacy in stroke recurrence and composite cardiac events, with a non-significant risk of major bleeding.

scholarly journals Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Aspirin in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirtipal Bhatia ◽  
Vardhmaan Jain ◽  
Devika Aggarwal ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
Sameer Arora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background and Purpose: Antiplatelet therapy is key for preventing thrombotic events after transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. Although the role of aspirin is well established, there is emerging evidence for the role of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in preventing recurrent stroke. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and study-level meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of early initiation of short-term DAPT (aspirin+P2Y12 inhibitor for up to 3 months) versus aspirin alone in patients with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Primary efficacy outcome was risk of recurrent stroke and primary safety outcome was incidence of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes studied were risk of any ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause death. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and CIs were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Four trials with a total of 21 459 patients were included. As compared to aspirin alone, DAPT had a lower risk of recurrent stroke (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.68–0.83]; P <0.001; I 2 = 0%) but a higher risk of major bleeding events (RR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.14–4.34], P =0.02, I 2 = 46.5%). Patients receiving DAPT had a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69–0.84], P <0.001, I 2 = 0%) and recurrent ischemic events (RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.67–0.82], P <0.001, I 2 = 0%). Conclusions: As compared to aspirin alone, short-term DAPT within 24 hours of high-risk transient ischemic attack or mild-moderate ischemic stroke reduces the risk of recurrent stroke at the expense of higher risk of major bleeding.

Clinical Effects of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy after Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, a Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Condello ◽  
Gaetano Liccardo ◽  
Giuseppe Ferrante
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Minor Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: Evidence about the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is emerging. The aim of our study was to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis about the risks and benefits of DAPT versus aspirin monotherapy in this setting. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov databases, main international conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing DAPT versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA not eligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy presenting in the first 24 hours after the acute event. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary efficacy endpoint was ischemic stroke recurrence, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, and all-cause death. Results: A total of 4 studies enrolling 21,459 patients were included. DAPT with clopidogrel was used in 3 studies, DAPT with ticagrelor in one study. DAPT duration was 21 days in one study, 1 month in one study, and 3 months in the remaining studies. DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence (relative risk [RR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.82, P<0.001, number needed to treat 50 [95% CI 40-72], while it was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (RR, 2.59; 95% CI 1.49-4.53, P=0.001, number needed to harm 330 [95% CI 149-1111]), of intracranial hemorrhage (RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.41-6.66, P=0.005), with a trend towards higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.83, 95% CI 0.83-4.05, P=0.14), and a slight tendency towards higher risk of all-cause death (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.89-1.89, P=0.16). Conclusions: Among patients with acute minor ischemic stroke or TIA, DAPT, as compared with aspirin monotherapy, might offer better effectiveness in terms of ischemic stroke recurrence at the expense of a higher risk of major bleeding. The trade-off between ischemic benefits and bleeding risks should be assessed in tailoring the therapeutic strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document