Females compensate for moult‐associated male nest desertion in Hooded Warblers

Ibis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-170
Author(s):  
William D. Harrod ◽  
Ronald L. Mumme
Polar Biology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 358-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Bourgeon ◽  
François Criscuolo ◽  
Fabrice Bertile ◽  
Thierry Raclot ◽  
Geir Wing Gabrielsen ◽  
...  

The Condor ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ryan Norris ◽  
Bridget J. M. Stutchbury ◽  
Trevor E. Pitcher

Abstract We tested whether Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina) avoided abrupt forest edges by radiotracking males breeding in small, isolated forest patches (0.5–2.0 ha) in northwest Pennsylvania. Because territory edges were synonymous with abrupt forest edges in all cases, we compared space use patterns with males radiotracked in a nearby continuous forest (150 ha), where we defined edge from territorial boundaries. Based on the proportion of edge to core area, males in both habitats avoided the area within 20 m of the edge, implying that males responded to the presence of territory edge rather than forest edge. Surprisingly, however, males in isolated fragments used the edge area significantly more than males in continuous forest, even when measured against the relative amount of edge area within each territory. Elevated levels of edge use were not related to distance of nests to edges, nest stage, or time of day. We conclude that the presence of physical edges is not the sole determinant of territorial space use in this species and there are likely additional social factors influencing occupancy rates in small, isolated woodlots. Therefore, definitions of forest-interior species based on edge use need to be reconsidered.


1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanislav Pribil ◽  
Jaroslav Picman

We tested five hypotheses that may explain why House Wren (Troglodytes aedon) nests are rarely parasitized by Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater). House Wrens may prevent parasitism in five ways: (1) by choosing to nest in cavities with small entrances (inaccessible-entrance hypothesis), (2) by restricting the size of the entrance with nest material (nest-structure hypothesis), (3) by puncturing and ejecting parasitic eggs (puncture–ejection hypothesis), (4) by burying the parasitized clutch under a new nest (egg-burial hypothesis), or (5) by abandoning the parasitized nest altogether (nest-desertion hypothesis). We tested these hypotheses in field experiments and found that (i) female cowbirds cannot enter circular entrances smaller than 38 mm in diameter, (ii) wrens prefer cavities with small entrances (inaccessible to cowbirds) to those with large entrances (accessible to cowbirds), (iii) when forced to breed in cavities with large entrances, wrens do not reduce the entrance size with nest material, (iv) despite the unusual strength of cowbird eggs, wrens are physically capable of puncture–ejecting them, (v) wrens do not puncture–eject cowbird eggs from their own nests, (vi) wrens do not abandon parasitized nests or bury the parasitized clutches under new nests. These results are consistent with the inaccessible-entrance hypothesis. We propose that additional nesting adaptations, as well as active cowbird avoidance of House Wrens, may contribute to the low frequency of cowbird parasitism.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 917-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
KL Kosciuch ◽  
TH Parker ◽  
BK Sandercock

The Condor ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélanie F. Guigueno ◽  
Spencer G. Sealy

The Auk ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Yorio ◽  
P. Dee Boersma

The Auk ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
SCOTT A. RUSH ◽  
BRIDGET J. M. STUTCHBURY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document