Age and associated stress field of middle Miocene back‐arc basalt magmatism in Northeast Japan

Island Arc ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Hosoi ◽  
Atsushi Yamaji ◽  
Hideki Iwano ◽  
Tohru Danhara ◽  
Takafumi Hirata
2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. KOKKALAS

Stress and strain analysis has been used to reconstruct the post-Oligocene geodynamics of the Kymi-Aliveri basin: The Kymi-Aliveri basin occupies the footwall of the Kymi-Thrust, which formed during the Middle Miocene as a large transpressional structure in the late orogenic stages of the Hellenides. Subsequently, in the Upper Miocene the shape of the basin was strongly modified by an orthogonal system of NE and NW trending normal faults as a result of post orogenic collapse. In the Pliocene and Pleistocene time the basin is a part of the back arc basin, which developed behind the Hellenic Arc. WNW trending normal faults and reactivated faults characterized this tectonic phase.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Jan Robert Baur

<p>This study investigates the nature, origin, and distribution of Cretaceous to Recent sediment fill in the offshore Taranaki Basin, western New Zealand. Seismic attributes and horizon interpretations on 30,000 km of 2D seismic reflection profiles and three 3D seismic surveys (3,000 km²) are used to image depositional systems and reconstruct paleogeography in detail and regionally, across a total area of ~100,000 km² from the basin's present-day inner shelf to deep water. These data are used to infer the influence of crustal tectonics and mantle dynamics on the development of depocentres and depositional pathways. During the Cretaceous to Eocene period the basin evolved from two separate rifts into a single broad passive margin. Extensional faulting ceased before 85 Ma in the present-day deep-water area of the southern New Caledonia Trough, but stretching of the lithosphere was higher (β=1.5-2) than in the proximal basin (β<1.5), where faulting continued into the Paleocene (~60 Ma). The resulting differential thermal subsidence caused northward tilting of the basin and influenced the distribution of sedimentary facies in the proximal basin. Attribute maps delineate the distribution of the basin's main petroleum source and reservoir facies, from a ~20,000 km²-wide, Late Cretaceous coastal plain across the present-day deep-water area, to transgressive shoreline belts and coastal plains in the proximal basin. Rapid subsidence began in the Oligocene and the development of a foredeep wedge through flexural loading of the eastern boundary of Taranaki Basin is tracked through the Middle Miocene. Total shortening within the basin was minor (5-8%) and slip was mostly accommodated on the basin-bounding Taranaki Fault Zone, which detached the basin from much greater Miocene plate boundary deformation further east. The imaging of turbidite facies and channels associated with the rapidly outbuilding shelf margin wedge illustrates the development of large axial drainage systems that transported sediment over hundreds of kilometres from the shelf to the deep-water basin since the Middle Miocene. Since the latest Miocene, south-eastern Taranaki Basin evolved from a compressional foreland to an extensional (proto-back-arc) basin. This structural evolution is characterised by: 1) cessation of intra-basinal thrusting by 7-5 Ma, 2) up to 700 m of rapid (>1000 m/my) tectonic subsidence in 100-200 km-wide, sub-circular depocentres between 6-4 Ma (without significant upper-crustal faulting), and 3) extensional faulting since 3.5-3 Ma. The rapid subsidence in the east caused the drastic modification of shelf margin geometry and sediment dispersal directions. Time and space scales of this subsidence point to lithospheric or asthenospheric mantle modification, which may be a characteristic process during back-arc basin development. Unusual downward vertical crustal movements of >1 km, as inferred from seismic facies, paleobathymetry and tectonic subsidence analysis, have created the present-day Deepwater Taranaki Basin physiography, but are not adequately explained by simple rift models. It is proposed that the distal basin, and perhaps even the more proximal Taranaki Paleogene passive margin, were substantially modified by mantle processes related to the initiation of subduction on the fledgling Australia-Pacific plate boundary north of New Zealand in the Eocene.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 631 ◽  
pp. 176-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mélody Philippon ◽  
Jean-Pierre Brun ◽  
Frédéric Gueydan ◽  
Dimitrios Sokoutis
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 158 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironao Shinjoe ◽  
Yuji Orihashi ◽  
Ryo Anma

AbstractWe present a new dataset of zircon U–Pb ages that document igneous activity in the SW Japan arc during middle Miocene time and discuss its relationship with the opening of the Japan Sea, Philippine Sea plate migration, and subduction of the young hot lithosphere of the Shikoku Basin. Precursory magmatism, characterized by dike and stock intrusions, started c. 15.6 Ma in both Kyushu and the Kii Peninsula. Most plutonism occurred between 15.5 and 13.5 Ma in an area 600 km long and 150 km wide. No along-arc trend was recognized in the U–Pb ages of igneous activity near the trench. Our data indicate that all near-trench middle Miocene igneous activity occurred immediately after the opening of the Japan Sea ceased, i.e. after 16 Ma, implying that melt extraction and the emplacement of granites in the near-trench region had some influence on the back-arc opening. Our data also imply that the trench–trench–trench-type triple junction between the Japan arc and the Izu–Bonin–Mariana arc must have reached the east side of the Kii Peninsula by 15.6 Ma. The wide distribution of contemporaneous magmatic activity along the arc requires a trench-parallel heat source, such as the subduction of a trench-parallel ridge or a young and highly segmented ridge–fracture zone system in addition to the hot wedge mantle condition related to the opening of Japan Sea.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Henriquet ◽  
Stéphane Dominguez ◽  
Giovanni Barreca ◽  
Jacques Malavieille ◽  
Carmelo Monaco

&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; In Central Mediterranean, the Sicilian Fold and Thrust Belt (SFTB) and Calabrian Arc, as well as the whole Apennine-Maghrebian belt, result from the subduction and collision with drifted micro-continental terranes. These terranes detached from the European margin and migrated southeastward in response to Neogene slab roll-back and associated back-arc extension. From N to S, the SFBT is divided in 4 main tectono-stratigraphic domains: (1) the Calabro-Peloritani terrane, drifted from the European margin and detached from the Corso-Sarde block since the back-arc opening of the Tyrrhenian basin, (2) the Neotethyan pelagic cover, constituting the remnants of the Alpine Tethys oceanic accretionary wedge, (3) the folded and thrusted platform (Panormide) and basinal (Imerese-Sicanian) series of the down-going African margin, and (4) the undeformed african margin foreland (Hyblean).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; The scarce good quality outcrops of key tectono-stratigraphic units and crustal scale seismic lines makes the structural architecture of the SFTB very controversial, as testified by the wide variety of tectonic interpretations (Bianchi et al., 1987; Roure et al., 1990; Bello et al., 2000; Catalano et al., 2013). Major outstanding issues particularly concern: (1) the occurence of Alpine Tethys units far from the region where the remnants of the Tethyan accretionary wedge outcrop (Nebrodi range); in a forearc position above the Peloritani block north of the SFTB and in an active foreland context along the southern front of SFTB; (2) the diverging suggested tectonic styles, from stacked large-scale tectonic nappes to foreland imbricated thrust systems rooted into a main basal d&amp;#233;collement; and (3), the deposition environnement of substantial units such as the widespread Numidian Flyschs, from syntectonic foreland basin to wedge-top sedimentation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; We used 2D analogue models to investigate the mechanical processes involved in the formation of the SFTB starting from the Oligocene Tethys subduction to the Middle Miocene - Late Pliocene continental collision with the African paleo-margin. Based on a detailed tectono-stratigraphic synthesis, complemented by field observations, we reproduce the first-order mechanical stratigraphy of the sedimentary and basement units involved in the SFTB as well as the structural inheritance of the African margin. Our models also include: syntectonic erosion and sedimentation, syn-orogenic flexure and adjustable material output via a &amp;#8220;subduction channel&amp;#8220;.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; The analog models succeed in reproducing the general structure of the SFTB and main tectono-stratigraphic correlations. For instance, the Panormide platform is underthrusted beneath the Alpine Tethys accretionary wedge, then stacked above the Imerese basinal units and belatedly exhumed in response to basement anticlinal stack. Our results also suggest that the Alpine Tethys units couldn&amp;#8217;t overthrust the whole African foreland in the Middle Miocene, nor be back-thrusted over the forearc basin during the Burdigalian. We rather favor a gravity-induced sedimentation process inducing reworking of the tethysian sediments at specific building stages of the accretionary wedge. The structural architecture of the modeled orogenic wedge is also consistent with a SFTB growing by frontal accretion and basal underplating of mechanically resistant stratigraphic units rather than by large-scale nappe overthrusting.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;


2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sato ◽  
K. Shuto ◽  
M. Uematsu ◽  
T. Takahashi ◽  
M. Ayabe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Jan Robert Baur

<p>This study investigates the nature, origin, and distribution of Cretaceous to Recent sediment fill in the offshore Taranaki Basin, western New Zealand. Seismic attributes and horizon interpretations on 30,000 km of 2D seismic reflection profiles and three 3D seismic surveys (3,000 km²) are used to image depositional systems and reconstruct paleogeography in detail and regionally, across a total area of ~100,000 km² from the basin's present-day inner shelf to deep water. These data are used to infer the influence of crustal tectonics and mantle dynamics on the development of depocentres and depositional pathways. During the Cretaceous to Eocene period the basin evolved from two separate rifts into a single broad passive margin. Extensional faulting ceased before 85 Ma in the present-day deep-water area of the southern New Caledonia Trough, but stretching of the lithosphere was higher (β=1.5-2) than in the proximal basin (β<1.5), where faulting continued into the Paleocene (~60 Ma). The resulting differential thermal subsidence caused northward tilting of the basin and influenced the distribution of sedimentary facies in the proximal basin. Attribute maps delineate the distribution of the basin's main petroleum source and reservoir facies, from a ~20,000 km²-wide, Late Cretaceous coastal plain across the present-day deep-water area, to transgressive shoreline belts and coastal plains in the proximal basin. Rapid subsidence began in the Oligocene and the development of a foredeep wedge through flexural loading of the eastern boundary of Taranaki Basin is tracked through the Middle Miocene. Total shortening within the basin was minor (5-8%) and slip was mostly accommodated on the basin-bounding Taranaki Fault Zone, which detached the basin from much greater Miocene plate boundary deformation further east. The imaging of turbidite facies and channels associated with the rapidly outbuilding shelf margin wedge illustrates the development of large axial drainage systems that transported sediment over hundreds of kilometres from the shelf to the deep-water basin since the Middle Miocene. Since the latest Miocene, south-eastern Taranaki Basin evolved from a compressional foreland to an extensional (proto-back-arc) basin. This structural evolution is characterised by: 1) cessation of intra-basinal thrusting by 7-5 Ma, 2) up to 700 m of rapid (>1000 m/my) tectonic subsidence in 100-200 km-wide, sub-circular depocentres between 6-4 Ma (without significant upper-crustal faulting), and 3) extensional faulting since 3.5-3 Ma. The rapid subsidence in the east caused the drastic modification of shelf margin geometry and sediment dispersal directions. Time and space scales of this subsidence point to lithospheric or asthenospheric mantle modification, which may be a characteristic process during back-arc basin development. Unusual downward vertical crustal movements of >1 km, as inferred from seismic facies, paleobathymetry and tectonic subsidence analysis, have created the present-day Deepwater Taranaki Basin physiography, but are not adequately explained by simple rift models. It is proposed that the distal basin, and perhaps even the more proximal Taranaki Paleogene passive margin, were substantially modified by mantle processes related to the initiation of subduction on the fledgling Australia-Pacific plate boundary north of New Zealand in the Eocene.</p>


1992 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. S. Zagorčev

AbstractThe Struma (Kraištid) Lineament is a part of a fault belt of regional importance. It strikes NNW-SSE and cuts through different Alpine tectonic zones along the whole Balkan Peninsula. Normal and strike-slip faults occurred in environments of extension and graben formation during collapse after or between collision epochs in the Palaeogene and Early Neogene, and in a back-arc extensional environment during the neotectonic (end of Middle Miocene-Quaternary) stage. The last Alpine compression phase occurred in the beginning of the Miocene, and Early-Middle Miocene planation formed the initial peneplain. New intense faulting marked the beginning of the neotectonic stage (Late Badenian), and the neotectonic development, including sedimentation, proceeded in four regional macrocycles: Badenian-Sarmatian; Maeotian; Pontian-Dacian; and Eopleistocene-Pleistocene. The neotectonic development was marked by formation of the Serbo-Macedonian Swell as well as by rifting (the Vardar and Struma rifts).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document