Supported decision‐making and mental capacity assessment in care homes: A qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Jayes ◽  
Lynn Austin ◽  
Laura J. E. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Capacity Assessment

scholarly journals Broad concepts and messy realities: optimising the application of mental capacity criteria

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2021-107571
Author(s):  
Scott Y H Kim ◽  
Nuala B Kane ◽  
Alexander Ruck Keene ◽  
Gareth S Owen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Functional Capacity ◽  
Functional Model ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Capacity Assessment ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Mental Capacity Act

Most jurisdictions require that a mental capacity assessment be conducted using a functional model whose definition includes several abilities. In England and Wales and in increasing number of countries, the law requires a person be able to understand, to retain, to use or weigh relevant information and to communicate one’s decision. But interpreting and applying broad and vague criteria, such as the ability ‘to use or weigh’ to a diverse range of presentations is challenging. By examining actual court judgements of capacity, we previously developed a descriptive typology of justifications (rationales) used in the application of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) criteria. We here critically optimise this typology by showing how clear definitions—and thus boundaries—between the criteria can be achieved if the ‘understanding’ criterion is used narrowly and the multiple rationales that fall under the ability to ‘use or weigh’ are specifically enumerated in practice. Such a typology-aided practice, in theory, could make functional capacity assessments more transparent, accountable, reliable and valid. It may also help to create targeted supports for decision making by the vulnerable. We also discuss how the typology could evolve legally and scientifically, and how it lays the groundwork for clinical research on the abilities enumerated by the MCA.

scholarly journals A qualitative study of older people with minimal care needs experiences of their admission to a nursing home with Registered Nurse care

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice K. Stevens ◽  
Helen Raphael ◽  
Sue M. Green
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Older People ◽  
Registered Nurse ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Health And Social Care

Purpose – Residential care for older people in the UK includes care homes with and without 24-hour Registered Nurse (RN) care. Reduced autonomy and personal wealth can result when people assessed as having minimal care needs, enter and reside in care homes with RN care. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experiences of older people with minimal care needs admission to care homes with RN care. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative study using a grounded theory method was undertaken. In total, 12 care home with RN care residents assessed as not requiring nursing care were interviewed. Initial sampling was purposive and progressed to theoretical. Interviews were analysed using the grounded theory analysis method of constant comparison and theory development. Findings – Two main categories emerged: “choosing the path”, which concerned the decision to enter the home, and “settling in”, which related to adaptation to the environment. Findings suggested participants who perceived they had greater control over the decision-making process found it easier to settle in the care home. The two categories linked to form an emerging framework of “crossing the bridge” from independent living to care home resident. Research limitations/implications – The findings contribute to the understanding of factors influencing admission of older people with minimal care needs to care homes with RN care and highlight the importance of informed decision making. Practical implications – Health and social care professionals must give informed support and advice to older people seeking care options to ensure their needs are best met. Originality/value – This study enabled older people with minimal care needs admission to care homes with RN care to voice their experiences.

Assessing capacity and decision-making

2020 ◽  
pp. 297-306
Author(s):  
Thomas McGowan ◽  
Adrian Blundell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Mental Capacity ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Capacity Assessment ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Case Vignettes ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Mental Capacity Act ◽  
Cognitive Problems ◽  
Common Situation

This chapter, ‘Assessing capacity and decision-making’, explores mental capacity and the practical, legal, and ethical components of this common situation; the MCA (Mental Capacity Act) and its five statutory principles: the stages of capacity assessment; assessment of capacity in the context of cognitive problems; making decision for patients lacking capacity; determining patient’s best interests. Determining a patient’s best interests is often a complex area, and one in which family and friends can be uniquely placed to help you make this judgement. However, the relatives’ views have no legal standing in English law, and the decision must be made by the responsible professionals. With the help of excellent case vignettes, this chapter describes advance care planning, lasting power of attorney, IMCA (independent mental capacity advocate), DOLS (deprivation of liberty safeguards), The Court of Protection, and the implications of mental capacity on medical research.

scholarly journals Perceptions of partial gland ablation for prostate cancer among men on active surveillance: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000068
Author(s):  
Sonia Hur ◽  
Michael Tzeng ◽  
Eliza Cricco-Lizza ◽  
Spyridon Basourakos ◽  
Miko Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Perceptions And Attitudes ◽  
Partial Gland Ablation

ObjectivesPartial gland ablation (PGA) therapy is an emerging treatment modality that targets specific areas of biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa) to minimize treatment-related morbidity by sparing benign prostate. This qualitative study aims to explore and characterize perceptions and attitudes toward PGA in men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on active surveillance (AS).Design92 men diagnosed with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS were invited to participate in semistructured telephone interviews on PGA.SettingSingle tertiary care center located in New York City.Participants20 men with very-low-risk, low-risk, and favorable intermediate-risk PCa on AS participated in the interviews.Main outcome measuresEmerging themes on perceptions and attitudes toward PGA were developed from transcripts inductively coded and analyzed under standardized methodology.ResultsFour themes were derived from 20 interviews that represent the primary considerations in treatment decision-making: (1) the feeling of psychological safety associated with low-risk disease; (2) preference for minimally invasive treatments; (3) the central role of the physician; (4) and the pursuit of treatment options that align with disease severity. Eleven men (55%) expressed interest in pursuing PGA only if their cancer were to progress, while nine men (45%) expressed interest at the current moment.ConclusionsAlthough an emerging treatment modality, patients were broadly accepting of PGA for PCa, with men primarily debating the risks versus benefits of proactively treating low-risk disease. Additional research on men’s preferences and attitudes toward PGA will further guide counseling and shared decision-making for PGA.

scholarly journals Evidence use as sociomaterial practice? A qualitative study of decision-making on introducing service innovations in health care

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Simon Turner ◽  
Danielle D´Lima ◽  
Jessica Sheringham ◽  
Nick Swart ◽  
Emma Hudson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Evidence Use

scholarly journals A Qualitative Study on the US Forest Service’s Risk Management Assistance Efforts to Improve Wildfire Decision-Making

Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 344
Author(s):  
Courtney A. Schultz ◽  
Lauren F. Miller ◽  
Sarah Michelle Greiner ◽  
Chad Kooistra
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Fire Management ◽  
Perceived Value ◽  
Forest Service ◽  
The Us ◽  
Decision Biases ◽  
Line Officers

To support improved wildfire incident decision-making, in 2017 the US Forest Service (Forest Service) implemented risk-informed tools and processes, together known as Risk Management Assistance (RMA). The Forest Service is developing tools such as RMA to improve wildfire decision-making and implements these tools in complex organizational environments. We assessed the perceived value of RMA and factors that affected its use to inform the literature on decision support for fire management. We sought to answer two questions: (1) What was the perceived value of RMA for line officers who received it?; and (2) What factors affected how RMA was received and used during wildland fire events? We conducted a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with decision-makers to understand the contextualized and interrelated factors that affect wildfire decision-making and the uptake of a decision-support intervention such as RMA. We used a thematic coding process to analyze our data according to our questions. RMA increased line officers’ ability to communicate the rationale underlying their decisions more clearly and transparently to their colleagues and partners. Our interviewees generally said that RMA data analytics were valuable but did not lead to changes in their decisions. Line officer personality, pre-season exposure to RMA, local political dynamics and conditions, and decision biases affected the use of RMA. Our findings reveal the complexities of embracing risk management, not only in the context of US federal fire management, but also in other similar emergency management contexts. Attention will need to be paid to existing decision biases, integration of risk management approaches in the interagency context, and the importance of knowledge brokers to connect across internal organizational groups. Our findings contribute to the literature on managing change in public organizations, specifically in emergency decision-making contexts such as fire management.

scholarly journals Correction to: Using behavioral insights to design implementation strategies in public mental health settings: a qualitative study of clinical decision-making

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana S. Last ◽  
Simone H. Schriger ◽  
Carter E. Timon ◽  
Hannah E. Frank ◽  
Alison M. Buttenheim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Public Mental Health ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Mental Health Settings

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document