scholarly journals Delivering end‐of‐life care for patients with cancer at home: Interviews exploring the views and experiences of general practitioners

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Wyatt ◽  
Hamad Bastaki ◽  
Nathan Davies
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
At Home

scholarly journals General practitioners' provision of end-of-life care and associations with dying at home: a registry-based longitudinal study

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Kjellstadli ◽  
Heather Allore ◽  
Bettina S Husebo ◽  
Elisabeth Flo ◽  
Hogne Sandvik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽  
Home Visits ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Out Of Hours ◽  
Dying At Home ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background General practitioners (GPs) may play an important role in providing end-of-life care to community-dwelling people. Objective To investigate patients' contacts with GPs, GPs' interdisciplinary collaboration, out-of-hours services and hospitalizations in the last 13 weeks of life and associations with dying at home. Second, investigate whether GP contacts were associated with fewer out-of-hours contacts or days hospitalized. Methods Individually linked data from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, Norwegian Patient Registry, Statistics Norway and Control and Payment of Reimbursement to Health Service Providers database for all 80 813 deceased people in Norway within 2012–13. Outcomes were analyzed with logistic regression and negative binomial multilevel mixed-effect models. Results Overall, 1% of people received GP home visits in Week 13 and 4.6% in the last week before death. During the last 4 weeks of life, 9.2% received one or more GP home visits. Altogether, 6.6% received one or more home visits when the GP had one or more interdisciplinary collaborations during the last 4 weeks, of which <3% died at home. GP office consultations decreased towards the end of life. The likelihood of home death versus another location increased in relation to GP home visits [one home visit odds ratio (OR) 1.92, confidence interval (CI) 1.71–2.15; two or more OR 3.49, CI 3.08–3.96] and GP interdisciplinary collaboration (one contact OR 1.76, CI 1.59–1.96; two or more OR 2.52, CI 2.32–2.74). Conclusions GPs play a role in enabling people to die at home by performing home visits and collaborating with other health care personnel. Only a minority received such services in Norway.

scholarly journals End-of-Life Care and Circumstances of Death in Patients Dying As a Result of Cancer in Belgium and the Netherlands: A Retrospective Comparative Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (32) ◽  
pp. 4327-4334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen Meeussen ◽  
Lieve Van den Block ◽  
Michael A. Echteld ◽  
Nicole Boffin ◽  
Johan Bilsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
End Of Life Issues ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
At Home

Purpose To examine and compare end-of-life care in patients with cancer dying in Belgium and the Netherlands. Patients and Methods A mortality follow-back study was undertaken in 2008 via representative nationwide sentinel networks of general practitioners (GPs) in Belgium and the Netherlands. By using similar standardized procedures, GPs reported on aspects of end-of-life care and the circumstances of nonsudden death of patients with cancer in their practice. Results Of the 422 reported patients with cancer, most resided at home during the last year of life (Belgium, 91%; the Netherlands, 95%). Death occurred at home in 34% (Belgium) and 61% (the Netherlands) and in the hospital in 29% (Belgium) and 19% (the Netherlands). In the last month of life, end-of-life issues were more often discussed in the Netherlands (88%) than in Belgium (68%). In both countries, physical problems were discussed most often (Belgium, 49%; the Netherlands, 78%) and spiritual issues least often (Belgium, 20%; the Netherlands, 32%). Certain end-of-life treatment preferences were known for 43% (Belgium) and 67% (the Netherlands) of patients. In the last week of life, treatment was most often focused on palliation (Belgium, 94%; the Netherlands, 91%). Physical distress was reported in 84% (Belgium) and 76% (the Netherlands) of patients and psychological distress in 59% and 36%. Most distressing was lack of energy (Belgium, 73%; the Netherlands, 71%) and lack of appetite (Belgium, 61%; the Netherlands, 53%). Two thirds of patients were bedridden (Belgium, 67%; the Netherlands, 69%). Conclusion Although place of death and communication about end-of-life issues differ substantially, a palliative treatment goal is adopted for the vast majority of patients in both countries. However, GPs reported that the majority of patients experienced symptom distress at the end of life, which suggests important challenges remain for improving end-of-life care.

scholarly journals What does effective end-of-life care at home for children look like? A qualitative interview study exploring the perspectives of bereaved parents

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110233
Author(s):  
Cari Malcolm ◽  
Katherine Knighting
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Bereaved Parents ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
At Home

Background: End-of-life care for children with life-shortening conditions is provided in a range of settings including hospital, hospice and home. What home-based, end-of-life care should entail or what best practice might look like is not widely reported, particularly from the perspective of parents who experienced the death of a child at home. Aim: To explore the value and assess the effectiveness of an innovative model of care providing home-based, end-of-life care as perceived by families who accessed the service. Design: A qualitative descriptive study design was employed with in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted with bereaved parents. Setting/participants: Thirteen bereaved parents of 10 children supported by the home-based end-of-life care service. Results: Parents reported effective aspects of end-of-life care provided at home to include: (1) ability to facilitate changes in preferred place of death; (2) trusted relationships with care providers who really know the child and family; (3) provision of child and family-centred care; (4) specialist care and support provided by the service as and when needed; and (5) quality and compassionate death and bereavement care. Parents proposed recommendations for future home-based end-of-life care including shared learning, improving access to home-based care for other families and dispelling hospice myths. Conclusion: Parents with experience of caring for a dying child at home offer valuable input to future the policy and practice surrounding effective home-based, end-of-life care for children. New models of care or service developments should consider the key components and attributes for effective home-based end-of-life identified by bereaved parents in this study.

scholarly journals Exploration of the Factor Structure of the Burden Experienced by Individuals Providing End-of-Life Care at Home

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chizuru Nagata ◽  
Hironori Yada ◽  
Junko Inagaki
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care At Home ◽  
At Home

In Japan, the number of elderly people who require long-term care is increasing as a result of the country’s aging population. Consequently, the burden experienced by caregivers who provide end-of-life care at home has become a social problem. This study aimed to confirm the factor structure of such caregiver burden by analyzing the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (J-ZBI). The J-ZBI was administered to 389 caregivers providing end-of-life care, and 247 answers were analyzed, with exploratory factor analysis performed on the results. Consequently, a four-factor structure emerged (sacrificing life, personal strain, severe anxiety, and captivity); these four factors, constituting 15 items, were cumulatively named “J-ZBI_15.” In regard to reliability, Cronbach’sαcoefficient for each factor was high; in terms of validity, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the four-factor structure, and the goodness of model fit was determined to be satisfactory. Further, the convergent validity was also high. The care burden experienced by those providing end-of-life care at home differs from the burden of caregivers of individuals with other diseases, such as Alzheimer’s. For assessing the burden felt by this population, the 15-item four-factor ZBI model is more appropriate than the single-factor 22-item ZBI, and we also determined that J-ZBI_8 is unsuitable for this task. Thus, measurement of family caregivers’ burden in regard to providing end-of-life care at home should be performed using the 15-item four-factor J-ZBI model.

scholarly journals The facilitators and challenges of dying at home with dementia: A narrative synthesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1042-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Mogan ◽  
Mari Lloyd-Williams ◽  
Karen Harrison Dening ◽  
Christopher Dowrick
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Narrative Synthesis ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Care At Home ◽  
At Home

Background: It is reported that, given the right support, most people would prefer to die at home, yet a very small minority of people with dementia do so. At present, knowledge gaps remain on how best to support end-of-life care at home for people with dementia. Aim: To identify and understand the challenges and facilitators of providing end-of-life care at home for people with dementia. Design: Narrative synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data. Data sources: The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted across six electronic databases (AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) and reference lists of key journals were searched up to July 2017. Results: Searches returned 1949 unique titles, of which seven studies met all the eligibility criteria (four quantitative and three qualitative). Six key themes were identified – four facilitators and two challenges. Facilitators included ‘support from health care professionals’, ‘informal caregiver resilience and extended social networks’, ‘medications and symptom management’ and ‘appropriate equipment and home adaptations’. Challenges included ‘issues with professional services’ and ‘worsening of physical or mental health’. Conclusion: People with dementia may not always require specialist palliative care at the end of life. Further research is required to overcome the methodological shortcomings of previous studies and establish how community development approaches to palliative care, such as compassionate communities, can support families to allow a greater number of people with dementia to die at home.

Pulmonary referrals to specialist palliative medicine: a survey

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003386
Author(s):  
Michael Bonares ◽  
Kenneth Mah ◽  
David Christiansen ◽  
John Granton ◽  
Andrea Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Chronic Respiratory Disease ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Referral Criteria ◽  
Referral Practices ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

ObjectivesPatients with chronic respiratory disease have significant palliative care needs, but low utilisation of specialist palliative care (SPC) services. Decreased access to SPC results in unmet palliative care needs among this patient population. We sought to determine the referral practices to SPC among respirologists in Canada.MethodsRespirologists across Canada were invited to participate in a survey about their referral practices to SPC. Associations between referral practices and demographic, professional and attitudinal factors were analysed using regression analyses.ResultsThe response rate was 64.7% (438/677). Fifty-nine per cent of respondents believed that their patients have negative perceptions of palliative care and 39% were more likely to refer to SPC earlier if it was renamed supportive care. While only 2.7% never referred to SPC, referral was late in 52.6% of referring physicians. Lower frequency of referral was associated with equating palliative care to end-of-life care (p<0.001), male sex of respirologist (p=0.019), not knowing referral criteria of SPC services (p=0.015) and agreement that SPC services prioritise patients with cancer (p=0.025); higher referral frequency was associated with satisfaction with SPC services (p=0.001). Late referral was associated with equating palliative care to end-of-life care (p<0.001) and agreement that SPC services prioritise patients with cancer (p=0.013).ConclusionsPossible barriers to respirologists’ timely SPC referral include misperceptions about palliative care, lack of awareness of referral criteria and the belief that SPC services prioritise patients with cancer. Future studies should confirm these barriers and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to overcome them.

Hospice Use Among Patients With Cancer: Trends, Barriers, and Future Directions

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 803-809
Author(s):  
Mihir N. Patel ◽  
Jonathan M. Nicolla ◽  
Fred A.P. Friedman ◽  
Michala R. Ritz ◽  
Arif H. Kamal
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Spiritual Needs ◽  
Life Care ◽  
General Acceptance ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Hospice Use

Patients with advanced cancer and their families frequently encounter clinical and logistical challenges related to end-of-life care. Hospice provides interdisciplinary and holistic care to meet patients’ biomedical, psychosocial, and spiritual needs in the last phases of life. Despite increasing general acceptance and use among patients with cancer, hospice remains underused. Underuse stems from ongoing misconceptions regarding hospice and its purpose, coupled with the rapid development of novel anticancer treatments, such as immunotherapies and targeted therapies, that have changed the landscape of possibilities. Furthermore, rapid evolutions in how end-of-life care is structured and reimbursed for will affect how oncology patients will intersect with hospice care. In this review, we explore the current and future challenges to greater integration of hospice care in the care of patients with advanced cancer and propose five recommendations as part of the path forward.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document