scholarly journals Aligning healthcare, public health and social services: A scoping review of the role of purpose, governance, finance and data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lanford ◽  
Aliza Petiwala ◽  
Glenn Landers ◽  
Karen Minyard
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Health And Social Services

Depression in the Developing World

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Minas
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
International Development ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Development Programs ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Health And Social Services ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Culturally Informed ◽  
Global Understanding

This chapter provides an overview of what is known about prevalence, social determinants, treatment, and course and impact of depression in developing, or low- and middle-income, countries. The importance of culture in depression and in the construction and application of diagnostic classifications and in health and social services is highlighted, with a particular focus on the applicability of ‘Western’ diagnostic constructs and service systems in developing country settings. The role of international organizations, such as WHO, and international development programs, such as the SDGs, in improving our understanding of depression and in developing effective and culturally appropriate responses is briefly examined. There is both a need and increasing opportunities in developing countries for greater commitment to mental health of populations, increased investment in mental health and social services, and culturally informed research that will contribute to improved global understanding of mental disorders in general and depression in particular.

scholarly journals The Integration of Psychosocial Care into National Dementia Strategies Across Europe: Evidence from the Skills in DEmentia Care (SiDECar) Project

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3422
Author(s):  
Ilaria Chirico ◽  
Rabih Chattat ◽  
Vladimíra Dostálová ◽  
Pavla Povolná ◽  
Iva Holmerová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
System Of Care ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Health And Social Services

There is evidence supporting the use of psychosocial interventions in dementia care. Due to the role of policy in clinical practice, the present study investigates whether and how the issue of psychosocial care and interventions has been addressed in the national dementia plans and strategies across Europe. A total of 26 national documents were found. They were analyzed by content analysis to identify the main pillars associated with the topic of psychosocial care and interventions. Specifically, three categories emerged: (1) Treatment, (2) Education, and (3) Research. The first one was further divided into three subcategories: (1) Person-centred conceptual framework, (2) Psychosocial interventions, and (3) Health and social services networks. Overall, the topic of psychosocial care and interventions has been addressed in all the country policies. However, the amount of information provided differs across the documents, with only the category of ‘Treatment’ covering all of them. Furthermore, on the basis of the existing policies, how the provision of psychosocial care and interventions would be enabled, and how it would be assessed are not fully apparent yet. Findings highlight the importance of policies based on a comprehensive and well-integrated system of care, where the issue of psychosocial care and interventions is fully embedded.

scholarly journals Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives in health and social services: protocol for a scoping review and Delphi survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ben Charif ◽  
◽  
Karine V. Plourde ◽  
Sabrina Guay-Bélanger ◽  
Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Services ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Scaling Up ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health And Social Services ◽  
Scoping Reviews

Abstract Background The scale-up of evidence-based innovations is required to reduce waste and inequities in health and social services (HSS). However, it often tends to be a top-down process initiated by policy makers, and the values of the intended beneficiaries are forgotten. Involving multiple stakeholders including patients and the public in the scaling-up process is thus essential but highly complex. We propose to identify relevant strategies for meaningfully and equitably involving patients and the public in the science and practice of scaling up in HSS. Methods We will adapt our overall method from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Following this, we will perform a two-prong study design (knowledge synthesis and Delphi study) grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach. This approach involves extensive participation of a network of stakeholders interested in patient and public involvement (PPI) in scaling up and a multidisciplinary steering committee. We will conduct a systematic scoping review following the methodology recommended in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. We will use the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants—any stakeholder involved in creating or testing a strategy for PPI; (2) intervention—any PPI strategy proposed for scaling-up initiatives; (3) comparator—no restriction; (4) outcomes: any process or outcome metrics related to PPI; and (5) setting—HSS. We will search electronic databases (e.g., Medline, Web of Science, Sociological Abstract) from inception onwards, hand search relevant websites, screen the reference lists of included records, and consult experts in the field. Two reviewers will independently select and extract eligible studies. We will summarize data quantitatively and qualitatively and report results using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will conduct an online Delphi survey to achieve consensus on the relevant strategies for PPI in scaling-up initiatives in HSS. Participants will include stakeholders from low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We anticipate that three rounds will allow an acceptable degree of agreement on research priorities. Discussion Our findings will advance understanding of how to meaningfully and equitably involve patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives for sustainable HSS. Systematic review registration We registered this protocol with the Open Science Framework on August 19, 2020 (https://osf.io/zqpx7/).

Redistributing Investment in Health and Social Services—The Evolving Role of Managed Care

JAMA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 320 (21) ◽  
pp. 2197 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Shrank ◽  
Donna J. Keyser ◽  
John G. Lovelace
Keyword(s):  
Managed Care ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Health And Social Services

scholarly journals Differentiation of organizational climate and culture in public health and social services in Finland

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilmari Rostila ◽  
Tarja Suominen ◽  
Paula Asikainen ◽  
Philip Green
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Organizational Climate ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Health And Social Services

scholarly journals The role of registered nurses in primary care and public health collaboration: A scoping review

Nursing Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1197-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Swanson ◽  
Sabrina T. Wong ◽  
Ruth Martin‐Misener ◽  
Annette J. Browne
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Registered Nurses ◽  
Scoping Review

scholarly journals Variation In Health Outcomes: The Role Of Spending On Social Services, Public Health, And Health Care, 2000–09

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 760-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H. Bradley ◽  
Maureen Canavan ◽  
Erika Rogan ◽  
Kristina Talbert-Slagle ◽  
Chima Ndumele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Social Services

scholarly journals Integration of Health and Social Services at the Systems Level: A Framework for Addressing Funding and Jurisdictional Silos

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (S2) ◽  
pp. S197-S203
Author(s):  
J. Mac McCullough ◽  
Jonathon P. Leider ◽  
Megan A. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Social Service ◽  
Service Integration ◽  
Health Spending ◽  
County Government ◽  
Social Service Agencies ◽  
Health And Social Services ◽  
Mixed Methods Case Study ◽  
Per Capita

Objectives. To examine spending and resource allocation decision-making to address health and social service integration challenges within and between governments. Methods. We performed a mixed methods case study to examine the integration of health and social services in a large US metropolitan area, including a city and a county government. Analyses incorporated annual budget data from the city and the county from 2009 to 2018 and semistructured interviews with 41 key leaders, including directors, deputies, or finance officers from all health care–, health-, or social service–oriented city and county agencies; lead budget and finance managers; and city and county executive offices. Results. Participants viewed public health and social services as qualitatively important, although together these constituted only $157 or $1250 total per capita spending in 2018, and per capita public health spending has declined since 2009. Funding streams can be siloed and budget approaches can facilitate or impede service integration. Conclusions. Health and social services should be integrated through greater attention to the budgetary, jurisdictional, and programmatic realities of health and social service agencies and to the budget models used for driving the systems-level pursuit of population health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document