scholarly journals Home and community care for older people in urban China: Receipt of services and sources of payment

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-235
Author(s):  
Bo Hu ◽  
Bingqin Li ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Cheng Shi
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Urban China ◽  
Home And Community Care ◽  
Care For Older People

Improving primary level home and community care services for older people: The case of Hong Kong

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan Fu ◽  
Ernest Wing Tak Chui ◽  
Wing Shan Kan ◽  
Lisanne Ko
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Older People ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Primary Level ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Home And Community Care

Book Review: Community Care for Older People

1997 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-40
Author(s):  
John Verdin Davies
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Care For Older People

scholarly journals What factors promote or inhibit implementation of a new procedure for screening and treatment of malnutrition in community settings? A prospective process evaluation of theImplementing Nutrition Screening in Community Care for Older People(INSCCOPe) project (UK)

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e023362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Bracher ◽  
Jane Murphy ◽  
Katherine Steward ◽  
Kathy Wallis ◽  
Carl R May
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Nutrition Screening ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Care For Older People

IntroductionMalnutrition remains underdetected, undertreated and often overlooked by those working with older people in primary care in the UK. A new procedure for screening and treatment of malnutrition is currently being implemented by a large National Health Service (NHS) trust in England, incorporating a programme of training for staff working within Integrated Community Teams and Older People’s Mental Health teams. Running in parallel, the Implementing Nutrition Screening in Community Care for Older People process evaluation study explores factors that may promote or inhibit its implementation and longer term embedding in routine care, with the aim of optimising sustainability and scalability.Methods and analysisImplementation will be assessed through observation of staff within a single area of the trust, in addition to the procedure development and delivery group (PDDG). Data collection will occur at three observation points: prior to implementation of training, baseline (T0); 2 months following training (T1); and 8 months following training (T2). Observation points will consist of a survey and follow-up semistructured telephone interview with staff. Investigation of the PDDG will involve: observations of discussions around development of the procedure; semistructured telephone interviews prior to implementation, and at 6 months following implementation. Quantitative data will be described using frequency tables reporting by team type, healthcare provider role group, and total study sample (Wilcoxon rank-sum and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests may also be conducted if appropriate. Audio and transcription data will be analysed using Nomarlization Process Theory as a framework for deductive thematic analysis (using the NVIVO CAQDAS software package).Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for the study has been granted through institutional ethical review (Bournemouth University); NHS Research Ethics committee approval was not required. Dissemination will occur through presentations to academic and practitioner audiences and publication results in peer-reviewed academic journals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document