scholarly journals Risk factors for a prolonged operative time in a single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

HPB ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norihiro Sato ◽  
Kei Yabuki ◽  
Kazunori Shibao ◽  
Yasuhisa Mori ◽  
Toshihisa Tamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Prolonged Operative Time

scholarly journals Comparative study of standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and complications

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4310
Author(s):  
Kirti Savyasacchi Goyal ◽  
Maneshwar Singh Utaal ◽  
Pramod Kumar Bhatia
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Gall Bladder Disease ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Bladder Disease ◽  
Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has evolved to be as gold standard treatment for gall bladder disease and is the most common laparoscopic procedure performed worldwide. In recent times, the innovative techniques of Natural orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) have been applied as a step forward towards scar less surgery with added benefits of less pain and less analgesic requirement, shorter hospital stay, quick return to work.Methods: A retrospective study of 50 patients admitted with gall bladder disease through outdoor for laparoscopic cholecystectomy from November 2018 to January 2019 in Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Mullana (AMBALA) were randomized into two groups of  25 each for Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) comparing the operative time, outcome and  complications.Results: 50 patients admitted to MMIMSR Mullana from November 2018 to January 2019 with gall bladder disease were divided into two groups of 25 each who underwent three port SILC and four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC). The average intra-operative time in SILC (80.56 mins) was significantly more than standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The average length of stay in the hospital for SILC was 1.8 days (1-3 days), was significantly less than in standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Incidence of Intraoperative complications were more in SILC than standard LC.Conclusions: SILC as the newer novel technique had better outcomes in terms of cosmesis, early discharge, shorter stay at hospital.

Comparison of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy versus Needlescopic Cholecystectomy: A Single Institutional Randomized Clinical Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Umemura ◽  
Takayuki Suto ◽  
Seika Nakamura ◽  
Hisataka Fujiwara ◽  
Fumitaka Endo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Needlescopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Incisional Pain

Background: Both single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and needlescopic cholecystectomy (NSC) are superior to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of cosmetic outcome and incisional pain. We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the surgical outcome, postoperative pain, and cosmetic outcome for SILC and NSC procedures. Methods: In this trial, 105 patients were enrolled (52 in the SILC group; 53 in the NSC group). A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the cosmetic outcome and incisional pain for patients. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the operative difficulty that was present for both procedures. Results: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or surgical outcomes, including operative time and blood loss. The mean VAS scores for cosmetic satisfaction were similar in both groups. There were significant differences in the mean VAS scores for incisional pain on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.009), and analgesics were required within 12 h of surgery (p = 0.007). Obesity (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2) was the only significant influential factor for operating time over 100 min (p = 0.031). Conclusion: NSC is superior to SILC in terms of short-term incisional pain. Experienced laparoscopic surgeons can perform both SILC and NSC without an increase in operative time.

scholarly journals Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Initial experience with different multichannel ports

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Raznatovic ◽  
Nemanja Zaric ◽  
Ljubomir Djurasic ◽  
Nebojsa Lekic ◽  
Vladimir Djordjevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Average Pain Score ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Cosmetic Effect ◽  
The Mean

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a relatively new minimally invasive surgical technique in treatment of benign gallbladder diseases. It is considered a bridge technique between conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and NOTES. We are presenting our initial experiences in SILC (single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Seventeen patients underwent SILC (11 women and 6 men) with an average age of 43 years. Mean BMI score was 29,4 kg/m2. The mean operative time was 93,5 minutes. There were conversions to conventional LC in two cases (11,6%). Average pain score measured on visual-analogue scale (VAS) 8h after the operation was 2,00. All patients expressed satisfaction with achieved cosmetic effect. We conclude that SILC is safe and feasible procedure, with excellent cosmetic effect, but further prospective studies are required before SILC can be generally accepted.

Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed via the “Marionette” Technique Shows Equivalence in Outcome and Cost to Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Selected Patient Population

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. 1015-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam N. Saidy ◽  
Sunal S. Patel ◽  
Mark W. Choi ◽  
Mohammed Al-Temimi ◽  
Deron J. Tessier
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The aim of our study is to compare single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) performed using the “marionette” technique (m-SILC), to the standard four-port technique [four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC)]. Patient information was extracted from a prospectively maintained database (n = 188). Our primary endpoint was operative costs (determined by operating time and instruments used). Secondary endpoints were length of stay, operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complication rates. Univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis was used to compare the outcomes. There were a total of 188 patients for this study. Gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and resident participation were similar. Patients undergoing m-SILC were younger (43.8 vs 49.8 years old), less likely to have cholangiogram (32% vs 54%), and were more likely to undergo cholecystectomy for chronic cholecystitis (73.3% vs 52%). In univariate analysis, cholecystectomy performed by the “marionette method” as compared with the 4PLC was associated with shorter operative time (67 vs 59 minutes respectively) and shorter hospital stay (1.2 vs 2.08 days respectively). In multivariate analysis, SILC was associated with shorter hospital stay and comparable operative time, blood loss, and postoperative complications. Instrumentation cost was less in SILC (by $94). SILC done by an experienced surgeon with the “marionette” technique on a carefully selected population shows a statistically significant cost benefit while maintaining clinically comparable outcomes to the standard 4PLC.

scholarly journals Risk factors for an additional port in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (3.4) ◽  
pp. 245-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Araki ◽  
Ken Shirabe ◽  
Akira Watanabe ◽  
Norio Kubo ◽  
Shigeru Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Additional Port

Impact of risk factors for prolonged operative time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1033-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marty Zdichavsky ◽  
Yasser A. Bashin ◽  
Gunnar Blumenstock ◽  
Derek Zieker ◽  
Tobias Meile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Prolonged Operative Time

Retrospective Non-Inferiority Analysis of Comparative of Performance on Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) between Using a Conventional Equipment and a Commercially Available Equipment

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
pp. 1326-1338
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Surgical Instrument ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Background: Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a modern technique for cholecystectomy via a single transumbilical incision. Original surgical equipment including an articulated minimally invasive surgical instrument was necessary for SILC procedures. However, the articulated long length with flexible rotatable tip instrument is expensive and could not be reimbursed by the Thai National Health Insurance. The present study used conventional laparoscopic equipment that is a non-articulated, shorter, and rigid tip to perform SILC. Objective: To compare the effectiveness between conventional and original equipment for the SILC procedure by evaluating the difficulty of SILC indicated by the length of operative time. Materials and Methods: The patients that underwent SILC in Thammasat University Hospital between October 2014 and December 2020 were reviewed from the electronic medical database. The primary outcome was the difficulty of the SILC procedure, determined from the operative time, to evaluate the performance of the SILC procedure between using the conventional or the original equipment in a non-inferiority trial. The secondary outcome was intraoperative and post-operative complications. Results: The eligibility criteria included 592 SILC procedure that was categorized as conventional equipment group with 351 (59.29%) patients and original equipment group with 241 (40.71%) patients. The multivariate analysis reported the number of difficult SILC procedures was less frequent in SILC using conventional equipment when compared with original equipment, significantly with 37 (10.54%) versus 43 (17.84%) relative risk (RR) (1.75, 95% CI 1.081 to 2.822, p=0.023). The intraoperative bile leakage, cystic artery injury, wound infection and 3-months follow-up of incisional hernia were not different in SILC procedures using eithers equipment. Conclusion: The application of conventional equipment that is used in multiple-port LC procedure to perform in SILC procedure was safe and not related to difficulty of SILC. This can reduce the cost of surgery, especially for articulated instrument that cannot be reimbursed from the National Health Insurance in Thailand. Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Articulated minimally invasive surgical instrument; Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Comparison of a Flexible-tip Laparoscope with a Rigid Straight Laparoscope for Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
pp. 1245-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Matsui ◽  
Hironori Ryota ◽  
Tatsuma Sakaguchi ◽  
Kazuyoshi Nakatani ◽  
Hideyuki Matsushima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Reduced Rate

This study assessed whether a flexible-tip laparoscope improves operative outcomes including operative length while performing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) compared with the use of a conventional straight laparoscope. The flexible-tip laparoscope decreased the operative time compared with the straight laparoscope. Although SILC has potential benefits, surgeons experience problems for in-line viewing through a laparoscope and from contact of instruments with the laparoscope, resulting in longer operative times and the need for additional ports. The aim of this study was to determine whether a flexible-tip laparoscope improves operative outcomes, including operative length and the rate of insertion of additional ports, while performing SILC compared with the use of a conventional rigid straight laparoscope. We reviewed data on patients for whom we performed SILC at the Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, for the period from November 1, 2009, to February 28, 2013. The information was assessed with respect to patient characteristics, types of laparoscope used, operative data as well as postoperative outcomes. Operating time for SILC using the flexible-tip laparoscope was significantly shorter than with the straight laparoscope (81.5 ± 23.2 vs 94.4 ± 21.1 minutes) as a result of a better view of the operating field without contact with working instruments. Although a trend was shown toward a reduced rate of the need for extra ports in the flexible-tip laparoscope group, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Using the flexible-tip laparoscope solved the problem of in-line viewing and decreased the operative time for SILC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document