scholarly journals Generational perceptions of promotion and tenure expectations by faculty in a striving university: A quest for legitimacy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Véliz ◽  
Susan K. Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Generational Perceptions

Correlation of Altmetric Attention Scores with Citations in Major Pharmacy Journals (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dave L Dixon ◽  
William L Baker
Keyword(s):  
Citation Count ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Scientific Output ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Article Type ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Number Of Citations ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND The impact and quality of a faculty members publications is a key factor in promotion and tenure decisions and career advancement. Traditional measures, including citation counts and journal impact factor, have notable limitations. Since 2010, alternative metrics have been proposed as another means of assessing the impact and quality of scholarly work. The Altmetric Attention Score is an objective score frequently used to determine the immediate reach of a published work across the web, including news outlets, blogs, social media, and more. Several studies evaluating the correlation between the Altmetric Attention Score and number of citations have found mixed results and may be discipline-specific. OBJECTIVE To determine the correlation between higher Altmetric Attention Scores and citation count for journal articles published in major pharmacy journals. METHODS This cross-sectional study evaluated articles from major pharmacy journals ranked in the top 10% according to the Altmetric Attention Score. Sources of attention that determined the Altmetric Attention Score were obtained, as well each articles open access status, article type, study design, and topic. Correlation between journal characteristics, including the Altmetric Attention Score and number of citations, was assessed using the Spearman’s correlation test. A Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the Altmetric Attention Scores between journals. RESULTS Six major pharmacy journals were identified. A total of 1,376 articles were published in 2017 and 137 of these represented the top 10% with the highest Altmetric Attention Scores. The median Altmetric Attention Score was 19 (IQR 15-28). Twitter and Mendeley were the most common sources of attention. Over half (56.2%) of the articles were original investigations and 49.8% were either cross-sectional, qualitative, or cohort studies. No significant correlation was found between the Altmetric Attention Score and citation count (rs=0.07, P = 0.485). Mendeley was the only attention source that correlated with the number of citations (rs=0.486, P<0.001). The median Altmetric Attention Score varied widely between each journal (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The overall median Altmetric Attention score of 19 suggests articles published in major pharmacy journals are near the top 5% of all scientific output. However, we found no correlation between the Altmetric Attention Score and number of citations for articles published in major pharmacy journals in the year 2017.

Publishing in Predatory Journals: Guidelines for Nursing Faculty in Promotion and Tenure Policies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion E. Broome ◽  
Marilyn H. Oermann ◽  
Leslie H. Nicoll ◽  
Julee B. Waldrop ◽  
Heather Carter‐Templeton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Faculty ◽  
Predatory Journals ◽  
Promotion And Tenure

Variation in Generational Perceptions of Child Health and Well-being

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L. Freed ◽  
Matthew M. Davis ◽  
Dianne C. Singer ◽  
Acham Gebremariam ◽  
Sara L. Schultz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Health ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Generational Perceptions ◽  
Health And Well Being

scholarly journals Faculty promotion and tenure

1982 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-1
Author(s):  
R C Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Promotion And Tenure

Unma(s)king Education in the Image of Business: A Vivisection of Educational Consumerism

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Schwartzman
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Free Market ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Improve Efficiency ◽  
Market Economic ◽  
University Life ◽  
Critical Autoethnography ◽  
Personal Perspectives ◽  
Tenure Process

Configuring students as consumers and higher education as a commodity have been widely suggested as ways to empower students and improve efficiency. This critical autoethnography challenges the assumptions and implications of modeling education after free market economic principles. Personal perspectives on the promotion and tenure process, students confronting the marketplace, and exemplary mentoring accompany poetic reflections on market-infused university life.

Degree Requirements for Art Faculty: Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure

Art Journal ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-181
Author(s):  
Jerome J. Hausman ◽  
Joanne Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Promotion And Tenure

scholarly journals How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan P Alperin ◽  
Carol Muñoz Nieves ◽  
Lesley A Schimanski ◽  
Gustavo E Fischman ◽  
Meredith T Niles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Academic Careers ◽  
Faculty Work ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Traditional Research ◽  
The Us ◽  
Public Evaluation ◽  
Work Done

Much of the work done by faculty at both public and private universities has significant public dimensions: it is often paid for by public funds; it is often aimed at serving the public good; and it is often subject to public evaluation. To understand how the public dimensions of faculty work are valued, we analyzed review, promotion, and tenure documents from a representative sample of 129 universities in the US and Canada. Terms and concepts related to public and community are mentioned in a large portion of documents, but mostly in ways that relate to service, which is an undervalued aspect of academic careers. Moreover, the documents make significant mention of traditional research outputs and citation-based metrics: however, such outputs and metrics reward faculty work targeted to academics, and often disregard the public dimensions. Institutions that seek to embody their public mission could therefore work towards changing how faculty work is assessed and incentivized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document