Minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma of patients with liver damage B: A propensity score-based analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 539-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takehiro Noda ◽  
Hidetoshi Eguchi ◽  
Yoshifumi Iwagami ◽  
Daisaku Yamada ◽  
Tadafumi Asaoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Damage ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection

Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Inconsistent Outcomes from Matched or Weighted Cohorts

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 560-568
Author(s):  
Lu Wu ◽  
Diamantis I. Tsilimigras ◽  
Katiuscha Merath ◽  
J. Madison Hyer ◽  
Anghela Z. Paredes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection

scholarly journals Oncologic outcome of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S359-S360
Author(s):  
Seoung Yoon Rho ◽  
Jee Yeon Lee ◽  
Dae Hoon Han ◽  
Jin Sub Choi ◽  
Gi Hong Choi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Oncologic Outcome ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection

scholarly journals Safety of intermittent Pringle maneuver during minimally invasive liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with and without cirrhosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago A. Ortiz Galindo ◽  
Philipp K. Haber ◽  
Christian Benzing ◽  
Felix Krenzien ◽  
Anna Riddermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Pringle Maneuver ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of minimally invasive intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) on postoperative outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the safety of IPM in patients with HCC who underwent minimally invasive liver resection during five years at our center. Factors influencing the use of IPM were examined in univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Cases with use of IPM (IPM) and those without use of IPM (no IPM) were then compared regarding intraoperative and postoperative outcomes after propensity score matching (PSM) for surgical difficulty. Results One hundred fifty-one patients underwent liver resection for HCC at our center and met inclusion criteria. Of these, 73 patients (48%) received IPM with a median duration of 18 min (5–78). One hundred patients (66%) had confirmed liver cirrhosis. In multivariate analysis, patients with large tumors (≥ 3 cm) and difficult tumor locations (segments VII or VIII) were more likely to undergo IPM (OR 1.176, p = 0.043, and OR 3.243, p = 0.001, respectively). After PSM, there were no differences in intraoperative blood transfusion or postoperative complication rates between the IPM and no IPM groups. Neither did we observe any differences in the subgroup analysis for cirrhotic patients. Postoperative serum liver function tests were not affected by the use of IPM. Conclusions Based on our findings, we conclude that the use of IPM in minimally invasive liver resection is safe and feasible for patients with HCC, including those with compensated liver cirrhosis.

Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Krenzien ◽  
Simon Wabitsch ◽  
Philipp Haber ◽  
Can Kamali ◽  
Philipp Brunnbauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document