Rejoinder to Levine, Clare et al.'s Comparison of the Park-Levine Probability Model Versus Interpersonal Deception Theory: Application to Deception Detection

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judee K. Burgoon
Keyword(s):  
Deception Detection ◽  
Probability Model ◽  
Interpersonal Deception Theory ◽  
Theory Application ◽  
Model Versus

A probability model of accuracy in deception detection experiments

2001 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Sun Park ◽  
Timothy Levine
Keyword(s):  
Deception Detection ◽  
Probability Model

An empirical evaluation of interpersonal deception theory in a real-world, high-stakes environment

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-199
Author(s):  
Joseph York Thomas ◽  
David P. Biros
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Deception Detection ◽  
Empirical Evaluation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
High Stakes ◽  
Capture Process ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Interpersonal Deception Theory ◽  
Deceptive Behavior ◽  
Speech Cues

Purpose The study of deception and the theories, which have been developed have relied heavily on laboratory experiments in controlled environments, using American college students participating in mock scenarios. The purpose of this paper is to validate previous deception detection research in a real-world, high stakes environment where the unit of analysis is the question–response pair. Design/methodology/approach The study used previously confirmed linguistic and paralinguistic speech cues and the constructs of deception in an attempt to validate a leading deception theory, interpersonal deception theory (IDT). A combination of descriptive and predictive analysis was conducted to best understand the relationship between speech cues and changes in the subjects’ behavior. Findings The result validates IDT with mixed results on individual measures and their constructs. However, there is clear evidence across the 711 question-response pairs that not only was it possible to differentiate truth from deceptive behavior but also patterns of behavior can be seen over time. Research limitations/implications Because of the real-world nature of the study, it is difficult to generalize the results to a larger population. However, one implication for future research is the development of methods to capture, process and prepare raw speech into data ready for analysis. Originality/value This paper attempts to fill the gap between the controlled mock scenarios and the harsh reality of real-world deception.

Response-Specific Scalp Distributions in Deception Detection and ERP Correlates of Psychopathic Personality Traits

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoinette R. Miller ◽  
J. Peter Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Deception Detection ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Psychopathic Personality ◽  
P300 Amplitude ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
P300 Component ◽  
Psychopathic Personality Inventory ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
First Time

Abstract University students were screened using items from the Psychopathic Personality Inventory and divided into high (n = 13) and low (n = 11) Psychopathic Personality Trait (PPT) groups. The P300 component of the event-related potential (ERP) was recorded as each group completed a two-block autobiographical oddball task, responding honestly during the first (Phone) block, in which oddball items were participants' home phone numbers, and then feigning amnesia in response to approximately 50% of items in the second (Birthday) block in which oddball items were participants' birthdates. Bootstrapping of peak-to-peak amplitudes correctly identified 100% of low PPT and 92% of high PPT participants as having intact recognition. Both groups demonstrated malingering-related P300 amplitude reduction. For the first time, P300 amplitude and topography differences were observed between honest and deceptive responses to Birthday items. No main between-group P300 effects resulted. Post-hoc analysis revealed between-group differences in a frontally located post-P300 component. Honest responses were associated with late frontal amplitudes larger than deceptive responses at frontal sites in the low PPT group only.

FAR INFRARED ABSORPTION IN ULTRAFINE AL PARTICLES DRUDE MODEL VERSUS GOR'KOV-ÉLIASHBERG THEORY

1977 ◽  
Vol 38 (C2) ◽  
pp. C2-93-C2-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. GRANQVIST ◽  
R. A. BUHRMAN ◽  
J. WYNS ◽  
A. J. SIEVERS
Keyword(s):  
Infrared Absorption ◽  
Far Infrared ◽  
Drude Model ◽  
Eliashberg Theory ◽  
Model Versus

Probability model for control parameters in the aircraft's information and control systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
A. Al-Ammouri ◽  
◽  
H.A. Al-Ammori ◽  
A.E. Klochan ◽  
A.M. Al-Akhmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Probability Model ◽  
Control Parameters ◽  
And Control

A rough set theory application in forecasting models

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haresh Sharma ◽  
◽  
Kriti Kumari ◽  
Samarjit Kar ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Rough Set ◽  
Rough Set Theory ◽  
Forecasting Models ◽  
Theory Application
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document