The diagnostic accuracy of bleeding assessment tools for the identification of patients with mild bleeding disorders: A systematic review

Haemophilia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. C. J. I. Moenen ◽  
P. J. Nelemans ◽  
S. E. M. Schols ◽  
H. C. Schouten ◽  
Y. M. C. Henskens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Bleeding Disorders ◽  
Mild Bleeding Disorders

scholarly journals Diagnostic value of transcranial ultrasonography for selecting subjects with large vessel occlusion: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Antipova ◽  
Leila Eadie ◽  
Ashish Stephen Macaden ◽  
Philip Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Direct Transfer ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion

Abstract Introduction A number of pre-hospital clinical assessment tools have been developed to triage subjects with acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) to a specialised endovascular centre, but their false negative rates remain high leading to inappropriate and costly emergency transfers. Transcranial ultrasonography may represent a valuable pre-hospital tool for selecting patients with LVO who could benefit from rapid transfer to a dedicated centre. Methods Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial ultrasonography in acute stroke was subjected to systematic review. Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched. Published articles reporting diagnostic accuracy of transcranial ultrasonography in comparison to a reference imaging method were selected. Studies reporting estimates of diagnostic accuracy were included in the meta-analysis. Results Twenty-seven published articles were selected for the systematic review. Transcranial Doppler findings, such as absent or diminished blood flow signal in a major cerebral artery and asymmetry index ≥ 21% were shown to be suggestive of LVO. It demonstrated sensitivity ranging from 68 to 100% and specificity of 78–99% for detecting acute steno-occlusive lesions. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.91. Transcranial ultrasonography can also detect haemorrhagic foci, however, its application is largely restricted by lesion location. Conclusions Transcranial ultrasonography might potentially be used for the selection of subjects with acute LVO, to help streamline patient care and allow direct transfer to specialised endovascular centres. It can also assist in detecting haemorrhagic lesions in some cases, however, its applicability here is largely restricted. Additional research should optimize the scanning technique. Further work is required to demonstrate whether this diagnostic approach, possibly combined with clinical assessment, could be used at the pre-hospital stage to justify direct transfer to a regional thrombectomy centre in suitable cases.

A Systematic Review of the Current State and Validity of Digital Assessment Tools for Psychiatry (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayra Anna Martin-Key ◽  
Benedetta Spadaro ◽  
Erin Funnell ◽  
Eleanor Jane Barker ◽  
Thea Sofie Schei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Mental Healthcare ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Digital Assessment ◽  
Current State

BACKGROUND Given the role digital technologies are likely to play in the future of mental healthcare, there is a need for a comprehensive appraisal of the current state and validity (i.e., screening/diagnostic accuracy) of digital mental health assessments. OBJECTIVE To explore the current state and validity of question-and-answer-based digital tools for diagnosing and screening psychiatric conditions in adults. METHODS This systematic review was based on the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework and was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, ASSIA, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for articles published between 2005 and 2020. A descriptive evaluation of the study characteristics and digital solutions and a quantitative appraisal of the screening/diagnostic accuracy of the included tools was conducted. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) guidelines. RESULTS A total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, with the most frequently evaluated conditions encompassing generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and any depressive disorder. The majority of the studies employed digitized versions of existing pen-and-paper questionnaires, with findings revealing poor to excellent screening/diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity = 0.36-1.00, specificity = 0.37-1.00, AUC = 0.57-0.98) and a high risk of bias for most of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS The current state of the field of digital mental health tools is in its early stages and high-quality evidence is lacking. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/25382

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Bleeding Assessment Tools for the Identification of Patients with Mild Bleeding Disorders: A Systematic Review

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4473-4473
Author(s):  
Floor CJI Moenen ◽  
Yvonne MC Henskens ◽  
Saskia AM Schols ◽  
Patty J Nelemans ◽  
Harry C. Schouten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Validation Studies ◽  
Bleeding Disorder ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Bleeding Disorders ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Mild Bleeding Disorders

Abstract Introduction A study of diagnostic test accuracy compares a single index test to a gold standard to determine status of disease. The observed accuracy of a test varies among patient subgroups and is sensitive to bias. To achieve reliable estimates of diagnostic accuracy, an appropriate study design in a clinically relevant population is warranted. Recently a review was published about the evolution of the bleeding assessment tool (BAT) in diagnosing patients with mild bleeding disorders (MBD) (Rydz et al. J Thromb Haemost 2012). Many validation studies have been done. However, a critical appraisal addressing the quality of these validation studies is lacking. Objective We performed a systematic review to determine the quality and applicability of studies assessing the diagnostic utility of the BAT for MBD among clinic based cohorts. Methods The literature search was conducted using the electronic database PubMed. The final search date was March 2, 2015. The search terms: 'bleeding disorder OR bleeding tendency' AND 'bleeding questionnaire' were used. All studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of bleeding questionnaires in identifying adults (age > 18 years) with MBD were considered eligible, irrespective of study design or used reference standard. The methodological quality and applicability of each included study was assessed using a Quality Assessment of Diagnostic studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. This tool consists of four domains specific for patient selection, index test, reference standard and participant flow. For each domain bias was assessed using signaling questions, for the first three domains applicability was assessed. Results The search yielded 530 citations, from which 35 possible relevant full-text studies were identified. Twenty-two studies were excluded, reasons for exclusion were: letter to the editor, validation of questionnaire combined with laboratory results and primary care population. Table 1 shows the 13 included studies, the assessed BAT and the targeted bleeding condition. Risk of bias and applicability concerns are summarized in figure 1. In 77% of the studies there was a high risk of bias for patient selection and applicability concerns. Many studies used a case control design, comparing patients with a known bleeding disorder with healthy controls. This leads to spectrum bias and might generate higher estimates of sensitivity and specificity (Rutjes et al. Clin Chem 2005). In 46% there was a high risk of bias for index test due to the use of a self-administered questionnaire or because the person conducting the questionnaire was aware of the diagnosis. This leads to observer bias caused by better awareness and over-reporting of bleeding symptoms. Finally, there was high risk of bias in study flow in 38% of the studies. These studies included symptoms after diagnosis of the bleeding disorder. Since bleeding disorders are managed by interventions to prevent bleeding, underestimation of the bleeding symptoms may occur. Conclusion This review highlights the difficulties and advantages of the BAT validation studies. It provides the ability for medical practitioners to apply the BAT with full awareness of its restrictions and benefits. With the evaluation of the risks of bias in the included studies we highlighted limitations, especially in method of patient selection and use of index test, that future studies preferably should try to avoid. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayra A Martin-Key ◽  
Thea S Schei ◽  
Eleanor J Barker ◽  
Benedetta Spadaro ◽  
Erin Funnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Digital Assessment ◽  
Question And Answer

BACKGROUND Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools for diagnosing a range of highly prevalent psychiatric conditions in the adult population. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) will be used. The focus of the systematic review is guided by the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework (PICO). We will conduct a comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for appropriate articles published from January 1, 2005. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any inconsistencies will be discussed and resolved. The two authors will then extract data into a standardized form. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and a descriptive analysis and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the identified digital assessment tools. RESULTS The systematic review and meta-analysis commenced in November 2020, with findings expected by May 2021. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools. It will identify implications for clinical practice, areas for improvement, and directions for future research. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020214724; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020214724. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/25382

scholarly journals The Current State and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mental Health Assessment Tools for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

10.2196/25382 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e25382
Author(s):  
Nayra A Martin-Key ◽  
Thea S Schei ◽  
Eleanor J Barker ◽  
Benedetta Spadaro ◽  
Erin Funnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Digital Assessment ◽  
Question And Answer

Background Despite the rapidly growing number of digital assessment tools for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, little is known about their diagnostic accuracy. Objective The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to establish the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools for diagnosing a range of highly prevalent psychiatric conditions in the adult population. Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) will be used. The focus of the systematic review is guided by the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework (PICO). We will conduct a comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) for appropriate articles published from January 1, 2005. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts of identified references and select studies according to the eligibility criteria. Any inconsistencies will be discussed and resolved. The two authors will then extract data into a standardized form. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool, and a descriptive analysis and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of the identified digital assessment tools. Results The systematic review and meta-analysis commenced in November 2020, with findings expected by May 2021. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis will summarize the diagnostic accuracy of question- and answer-based digital assessment tools. It will identify implications for clinical practice, areas for improvement, and directions for future research. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020214724; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020214724. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/25382

scholarly journals Depression Screening Tools for Patients with Kidney Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1785-1795
Author(s):  
Karli Kondo ◽  
Jennifer R. Antick ◽  
Chelsea K. Ayers ◽  
Devan Kansagara ◽  
Pavan Chopra
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Beck Depression Inventory ◽  
Kidney Failure ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Depression Screening ◽  
Patient Health Questionnaire ◽  
Health Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Health

Background and objectivesPatients with kidney failure experience depression at rates higher than the general population. Despite the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ ESRD Quality Incentive Program requirements for routine depression screening for patients with kidney failure, no clear guidance exists.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsFor this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and other databases from inception to June 2020. Two investigators screened all abstracts and full text. We included studies assessing patients with kidney failure and compared a tool to a clinical interview or another validated tool (e.g., Beck Depression Inventory II). We abstracted data related to sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the area under the curve. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2.ResultsA total of 16 studies evaluated the performance characteristics of depression assessment tools for patients with kidney failure. The Beck Depression Inventory II was by far the best studied. A wide range of thresholds were reported. Shorter tools in the public domain such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 and Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (adults over 60) performed well but were not well studied. Short tools such as the Beck Depression Inventory–Fast Screen may be a good option for an initial screen.ConclusionsThere is limited research evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of most screening tools for depression in patients with kidney failure, and existing studies may not be generalizable to US populations. Studies suffer from limitations related to methodology quality and/or reporting. Future research should target widely used, free tools such as the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020140227.

Bleeding Assessment Tools: Limits and Advantages for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Inherited Bleeding Disorders

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (05) ◽  
pp. 463-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Tosetto
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Bleeding Disorders ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Mild Bleeding Disorders

Bleeding assessment tools were first developed essentially as research tools, for the quantification of bleeding symptoms and the study of phenotype/genotype correlations. Interestingly, these tools have been proven useful also for clinicians diagnosing and treating bleeding disorders. The main advantage of these tools is the standardization of the diagnostic process, allowing the introduction of criteria with known specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of the most common mild bleeding disorders, particularly von Willebrand disease. This is important also for a rational approach to the laboratory diagnosis because for many mild bleeding disorders, a complex laboratory workup is required. Bleeding assessment tools should always be complemented by ancillary coagulation screening tests to exclude the presence of a bleeding disorder, however. Finally, bleeding severity assessed by such tools has been shown to correlate with the long-term probability of bleeding. Therefore, the bleeding assessment could become an important marker of disease severity.

Stress, anxiety, depression and burnout in frontline health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a brief systematic review and new data from Russia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Mosolova ◽  
Dmitry Sosin ◽  
Sergey Mosolov
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
The Impact

During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) have been subject to increased workload while also exposed to many psychosocial stressors. In a systematic review we analyze the impact that the pandemic has had on HCWs mental state and associated risk factors. Most studies reported high levels of depression and anxiety among HCWs worldwide, however, due to a wide range of assessment tools, cut-off scores, and number of frontline participants in the studies, results were difficult to compare. Our study is based on two online surveys of 2195 HCWs from different regions of Russia during spring and autumn epidemic outbreaks revealed the rates of anxiety, stress, depression, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and perceived stress as 32.3%, 31.1%, 45.5%, 74.2%, 37.7% ,67.8%, respectively. Moreover, 2.4% of HCWs reported suicidal thoughts. The most common risk factors include: female gender, nurse as an occupation, younger age, working for over 6 months, chronic diseases, smoking, high working demands, lack of personal protective equipment, low salary, lack of social support, isolation from families, the fear of relatives getting infected. These results demonstrate the need for urgent supportive programs for HCWs fighting COVID-19 that fall into higher risk factors groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document