End-stage haemophilic arthropathy of the ankle: ankle fusion or total ankle replacement

Haemophilia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. e106-e107 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Keyword(s):  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Ankle Fusion ◽  
Haemophilic Arthropathy ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
End Stage

scholarly journals An Update on the Canadian Experience Treating End Stage Ankle Arthritis with Fusion or Replacement Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0013
Author(s):  
Kevin Wing ◽  
Jason Sutherland ◽  
Timothy Daniels ◽  
Peter Dryden ◽  
Murray Penner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Ankle Fusion ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End Stage

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: There is much interest in the surgical treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Our team has previously reported comparisons between ankle fusion and replacement outcomes for 321 ankles at 5.5 years from a prospective cohort. This research extends the observational period for another six years, ending in 2013. Our primary hypothesis is that patient-reported clinical outcomes for ankle fusion and replacements would be similar at last follow up. Methods: Patients in the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Prospective Ankle Reconstructive Database were treated with total ankle replacement (involving Agilty, Star, Mobilty, Hintegra, or Inbone) or fusion (open or arthroscopic). Patient characteristics collected included demographics, comorbidities, smoking status and body mass index. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) completed by patients were the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Pre-operative and most recent patient data, with at least four years follow-up, were analyzed. Sensitivity analyses excluded ankles that had undergone revision. A linear mixed-effects regression model compared scores between total ankle replacement and fusion groups, adjusting for patient characteristics, baseline data and surgeon. Results: The sample included 844 ankles (556 ankle replacements and 284 arthrodesis). The mean follow up period was 8.0 years (standard deviation 3.1 years), with minimum and maximum of 4 and 14 years, respectively. Patients treated with arthrodesis were younger, more likely to be diabetic and smokers, and somewhat less likely to have inflammatory arthritis. Overall, 19.4% of ankle fusion and 30.8% of ankle replacements underwent all-cause re-operation. The mean AOS total score improved from 58.6 points pre-operatively to 31.4 post-operatively (delta 27.2), and from 57.0 to 26.9 points (delta 30.1) in the ankle replacement group. Differences in the change in AOS and SF-36 scores between the arthrodesis and ankle replacement groups were minimal after adjustment for baseline characteristics and surgeon. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis were comparable in a diverse cohort of patients whose follow up period ranged between 4 and 14 years post-operatively.

Living With Both a Total Ankle Replacement and an Ankle Fusion: A Qualitative Study From the Patients’ Perspective

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110044
Author(s):  
Catherine Conlin ◽  
Ryan M. Khan ◽  
Ian Wilson ◽  
Timothy R. Daniels ◽  
Mansur Halai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Foot Placement ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Ankle Fusion ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle fusion are effective treatments for end-stage ankle arthritis. Comparative studies elucidate differences in treatment outcomes; however, the literature lacks evidence demonstrating what outcomes are important to patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate patients’ experiences of living with both a TAR and ankle fusion. Methods: This research study used qualitative description. Individuals were selected from a cohort of patients with TAR and/or ankle fusion (n = 1254). Eligible patients were English speaking with a TAR and contralateral ankle fusion, and a minimum of 1 year since their most recent ankle reconstruction. Surgeries were performed by a single experienced surgeon, and semistructured interviews were conducted by a single researcher in a private hospital setting or by telephone. Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) scores, radiographs, and ancillary surgical procedures were collected to characterize patients. Themes were derived through qualitative data analysis. Results: Ten adults (8 men, 2 women), ages 59 to 90 years, were included. Average AOS pain and disability scores were similar for both surgeries for most patients. Participants discussed perceptions of each reconstructed ankle. Ankle fusions were considered stable and strong, but also stiff and compromising balance. TARs were considered flexible and more like a “normal ankle,” though patients expressed concerns about their TAR “turning” on uneven ground. Individuals applied this knowledge to facilitate movement, particularly during a first step and transitioning between positions. They described the need for careful foot placement and attention to the environment to avoid potential challenges. Conclusion: This study provides insight into the experiences of individuals living with a TAR and ankle fusion. In this unusual but limited group of patients, we found that each ankle reconstruction was generally perceived to have different characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. Most participants articulated a preference for their TAR. These findings can help clinicians better counsel patients on expectations after TAR and ankle fusion, and improve patient-reported outcome measures by better capturing meaningful outcomes for patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty Survivorship, Complication, and Revision Rates in Patients Younger Than 55 Years

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002098092
Author(s):  
Devon W. Consul ◽  
Anson Chu ◽  
Travis M. Langan ◽  
Christopher F. Hyer ◽  
Gregory Berlet
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Ankle Arthrodesis ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
End Stage

Total ankle replacement has become a viable alternative to ankle arthrodesis in the surgical management of advanced ankle arthritis. Total ankle replacement has generally been reserved for patients who are older and for those who will have a lower demand on the replacement. The purpose of the current study is to review patient outcomes, complications, and implant survival in patients younger than 55 years who underwent total ankle replacement at a single institution. A single-center chart and radiographic review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent total ankle replacement for treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. All surgeries were performed by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons at a single institution. A total of 51 patients met inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 31.2 months (SD = 16.2). Implant survival was 94%, There were 7 major complications (13%) requiring an unplanned return to the operating room and 8 minor complications (15%) that resolved with conservative care. The results of this study show that total ankle replacement is a viable treatment option for patients younger than 55 years. Levels of Evidence: A retrospective case series

scholarly journals Clinical Radiographical Outcomes and Complications after a Brand-New Total Ankle Replacement Design through an Anterior Approach: A Retrospective at a Short-Term Follow Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2258
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Mosca ◽  
Silvio Caravelli ◽  
Emanuele Vocale ◽  
Simone Massimi ◽  
Davide Censoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mean Value ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ankle Osteoarthritis ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Term Performance ◽  
Replacement Design

Recently, the progress in techniques and in projecting new prosthetic designs has allowed increasing indications for total ankle replacement (TAR) as treatment for ankle osteoarthritis. This retrospective work comprehended 39 subjects aged between 47 and 79 years old. The patients, observed for at least 12 months (mean follow up of 18.2 ± 4.1 months), have been evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters, both pre- and post-operatively. The AOFAS and VAS score significantly improved, respectively, from 46.2 ± 4.8 to 93.9 ± 4.1 and from 7.1 ± 1.1 to 0.7 ± 0.5 (p value < 0.05). At the final evaluation, the mean plantarflexion passed from 12.2° ± 2.3° to 18.1° ± 2.4° (p value < 0.05) and dorsiflexion from a pre-operative mean value of 8.7° ± 4.1° to 21.7° ± 5.4° post-operatively (p value < 0.05). This study found that this new total ankle replacement design is a safe and effective procedure for patients effected by end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Improvements have been demonstrated in terms of range of motion, radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes. However, further studies are needed to assess the long-term performance of these prostheses.

scholarly journals Is End-Stage Ankle Arthrosis Best Managed with Total Ankle Replacement or Arthrodesis? A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Jordan ◽  
Gurdip S. Chahal ◽  
Anna Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ankle Arthrodesis ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Comparative Group ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
End Stage

Introduction. End-stage ankle osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition. Traditionally, ankle arthrodesis (AA) has been the surgical intervention of choice but the emergence of total ankle replacement (TAR) has challenged this concept. This systematic review aims to address whether TAR or AA is optimal in terms of functional outcomes.Methods. We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA checklist using the online databases Medline and EMBASE after January 1, 2005. Participants must be skeletally mature and suffering from ankle arthrosis of any cause. The intervention had to be an uncemented TAR comprising two or three modular components. The comparative group could include any type of ankle arthrodesis, either open or arthroscopic, using any implant for fixation. The study must have reported at least one functional outcome measure.Results. Of the four studies included, two reported some significant improvement in functional outcome in favour of TAR. The complication rate was higher in the TAR group. However, the quality of studies reviewed was poor and the methodological weaknesses limited any definitive conclusions being drawn.Conclusion. The available literature is insufficient to conclude which treatment is superior. Further research is indicated and should be in the form of an adequately powered randomised controlled trial.

Mid- to long-term results of total ankle replacement in patients with haemophilic arthropathy: A 10-year follow-up

Haemophilia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Eckers ◽  
D. E. Bauer ◽  
A. Hingsammer ◽  
R. Sutter ◽  
B. Brand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Haemophilic Arthropathy ◽  
Ankle Replacement

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Mobile-bearing and Fixed-bearing Total Ankle Replacement

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0009
Author(s):  
James Nunley ◽  
Samuel Adams ◽  
James DeOrio ◽  
Mark Easley
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mobile Bearing ◽  
Cyst Formation ◽  
Total Ankle Replacement ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Ankle Arthritis ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
End Stage

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Outcomes of total ankle replacement for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis continue to improve. Debate continues whether a mobile-bearing total ankle replacement (MB-TAR) or a fixed-bearing total ankle replacement (FB-TAR) is superior, with successful outcomes reported longterm for MB-TAR and at intermediate-to-longterm follow-up for newer generation FB-TAR. Although comparisons between the two total ankle designs have been reported, to our knowledge, no investigation has compared the two designs with a high level of evidence. This prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a single institution compares patient satisfaction, functional outcomes and radiographic results of the mobile-bearing STAR and the fixed-bearing Salto-Talaris in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. Methods: This investigation was approved by our institution’s IRB committee. Between November 2011 and November 2014, adult patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis failing nonoperative treatment were introduced to the study. With informed consent, 100 patients (31 male and 69 female, average age 65, range 35 to 85) were enrolled; demographic comparison between the two cohorts was similar. Exclusion criteria included inflammatory arthropathy, neuropathy, weight exceeding 250 pounds, radiographic coronal plane deformity greater than 15 degrees or extensive talar dome wear pattern (“flat top talus”). Prospective patient-reported outcomes, physical exam and standardized weightbearing ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and then at yearly intervals. Data collection included visual analog pain score (VAS), short form 36 (SF-36), foot and ankle disability index (FADI), short musculoskeletal functional assessment (SMFA) and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score. Surgeries were performed by non-design team orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists with total ankle replacement expertise. Statistically analysis was performed by a qualified statistician. Results: At average follow-up of 4.5 years (range 2-6 years) complete clinical data and radiographs were available for 84 patients; 7 had incomplete data, one had died, 4 were withdrawn after enrolling but prior to surgery and 4 were lost to follow-up. In all outcome measures, the entire cohort demonstrated statistically significant improvements from preoperative evaluation to most recent follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in improvement in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Radiographically, tibial lucency/cyst formation was 26.8% and 20.9% for MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Tibial settling/subsidence occurred in 7.3% of MB-TAR. Talar lucency/cyst formation occurred in 24.3% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Talar subsidence was observed in 21.9% and 2.0% of MB-TAR and FB-TAR, respectively. Re-operations were performed in 8 MB-TAR and 3 FB-TAR, with the majority of procedures being to relieve impingement or treat cysts and not to revise or remove metal implants. Conclusion: For the first time, with a high level of evidence, our study confirms that patient reported and clinical outcomes are favorable for both designs and that there is no significant difference in clinical improvement between the two implants. The incidence of lucency/cyst formation was similar for MB-TAR and FB-TAR for the tibial component, but the MB-TAR had greater talar lucency/cyst formation and tibial and talar subsidence. As has been suggested in previous studies, clinical outcomes do not correlate with radiographic findings. Re-operations were more common for MB-TAR and in the majority of cases were to relieve impingement or treat cysts rather than revise or remove metal implants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document