Numerical modeling of nitrate removal in anoxic groundwater during river flooding of riparian zones

Ground Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jannick Kolbjørn Jensen ◽  
Bertel Nilsson ◽  
Peter Engesgaard
2006 ◽  
Vol 116 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 197-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Dhondt ◽  
Pascal Boeckx ◽  
Niko E. C. Verhoest ◽  
Georges Hofman ◽  
Oswald Van Cleemput

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 6715-6750 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Peter ◽  
R. Rechsteiner ◽  
M. F. Lehmann ◽  
R. Brankatschk ◽  
T. Vogt ◽  
...  

Abstract. For the design and the assessment of river restoration projects, it is important to know to what extent the elimination of reactive nitrogen (N) can be improved in the riparian groundwater. We investigated the effectiveness of different riparian zones, characterized by a riparian vegetation succession, on nitrate (NO3−) removal from infiltrating river water in a restored and a still channelized section of the River Thur, Switzerland. Functional genes of denitrification (nirS and nosZ) were relatively abundant in groundwater from willow bush and mixed forest dominated zones, where oxygen concentrations remained low compared to the main channel and other riparian zones. After flood events, a substantial decline in NO3− concentration (>50 %) was observed in the willow bush zone, but not in the other riparian zones closer to the river. In addition, the characteristic enrichment of 15N and 18O in the residual NO3− pool (by up to 22 ‰ for δ15N and up to 12 ‰ for δ18O) provides qualitative evidence that the willow bush and forest zones were sites of active denitrification and, to a lesser extent, NO3− removal by plant uptake. Particularly in the willow bush zone, during a period of water table elevation after a flooding event, substantial input of organic carbon into the groundwater occurred, thereby fostering post-flood denitrification activity that reduced NO3− concentration with a rate of ~21 μmol N l−1 d−1. Nitrogen removal in the forest zone was not sensitive to flood pluses, and overall NO3− removal rates were lower (~6 μmol l−1 d−1). Hence, discharge-modulated vegetation-soil-groundwater coupling was found to be a~key driver for riparian NO3− removal. We estimated that, despite higher rates in the fairly constrained willow bush hot spot, total NO3− removal from the groundwater is lower than in the extended forest area. Overall, the aquifer in the restored section was more effective and removed ~20 % more NO3− than the channelized section.


Author(s):  
Arthur J. Gold ◽  
Peter M. Groffman ◽  
Kelly Addy ◽  
D. Q. Kellogg ◽  
Mark Stolt ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe G. F. Vidon ◽  
Alan R. Hill

2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Rassam ◽  
D. Pagendam

One feature of riparian zones is their ability to significantly reduce the nitrogen loads entering streams by removing nitrate from the groundwater. A novel GIS model was used to prioritise riparian rehabilitation in catchments. It is proposed that high-priority areas are those with a high potential for riparian denitrification and have nearby land uses that generate high nitrogen loads. For this purpose, we defined the Rehabilitation Index, which is the product of two other indices, the Nitrate Removal Index and the Nitrate Interception Index. The latter identifies the nitrate contamination potential for each raster cell in the riparian zone by examining the extent and proximity of agricultural urban land uses. The former is estimated using a conceptual model for surface–groundwater interactions in riparian zones associated with middle-order gaining perennial streams, where nitrate is removed via denitrification when the base flow interacts with the carbon-rich riparian sediments before discharging to the streams. Riparian zones that are relatively low in the landscape, have a flat topography, and have soils of medium hydraulic conductivity are most conducive to denitrification. In the present study, the model was implemented in the Tully–Murray basin, Queensland, Australia, to produce priority riparian rehabilitation area maps.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 4295-4307 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Peter ◽  
R. Rechsteiner ◽  
M. F. Lehmann ◽  
R. Brankatschk ◽  
T. Vogt ◽  
...  

Abstract. For the design and the assessment of river restoration projects, it is important to know to what extent the elimination of reactive nitrogen (N) can be improved in the riparian groundwater. We investigated the effectiveness of different riparian zones, characterized by a riparian vegetation succession, for nitrate (NO3−) removal from infiltrating river water in a restored and a still channelized section of the river Thur, Switzerland. Functional genes of denitrification (nirS and nosZ) were relatively abundant in groundwater from willow bush and mixed forest dominated zones, where oxygen concentrations remained low compared to the main channel and other riparian zones. After flood events, a substantial decline in NO3− concentration (> 50%) was observed in the willow bush zone but not in the other riparian zones closer to the river. In addition, the characteristic enrichment of 15N and 18O in the residual NO3− pool (by up to 22‰ for δ15N and up to 12‰ for δ18O) provides qualitative evidence that the willow bush and forest zones were sites of active denitrification and, to a lesser extent, NO3− removal by plant uptake. Particularly in the willow bush zone during a period of water table elevation after a flooding event, substantial input of organic carbon into the groundwater occurred, thereby fostering post-flood denitrification activity that reduced NO3− concentration with a rate of ~21 μmol N l−1 d−1. Nitrogen removal in the forest zone was not sensitive to flood pulses, and overall NO3− removal rates were lower (~6 μmol l−1 d−1). Hence, discharge-modulated vegetation–soil–groundwater coupling was found to be a key driver for riparian NO3− removal. We estimated that, despite higher rates in the fairly constrained willow bush hot spot, total NO3− removal from the groundwater is lower than in the extended forest area. Overall, the aquifer in the restored section was more effective and removed ~20% more NO3− than the channelized section.


2011 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Chen ◽  
Min-hua Ling ◽  
Qiu Zhou ◽  
Zhi-cai Zhang ◽  
Qin-bo Cheng

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deon Knights ◽  
◽  
Audrey Sawyer ◽  
Audrey Sawyer ◽  
Douglas A. Edmonds ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document