scholarly journals Good governance and multidimensional poverty: A comparative analysis of 71 countries

Governance ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Jindra ◽  
Ana Vaz
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Multidimensional Poverty

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of evidence based policies in the era of digitalization

2020 ◽  
Vol 338 ◽  
pp. 477-485
Author(s):  
András Bojtor ◽  
Gábor Bozsó
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Policy Cycle ◽  
Evaluation Phase ◽  
Analysis Of Results ◽  
Strategic Policy ◽  
Political Conditions ◽  
International Comparative

A well-functioning administration with embedded institutions enables the formulation of a competitive environment which propitiously effects the country’s economic growth. In case of an intervention, the results and impacts should be measured and continuously monitored in a strategic policy cycle. These activities can be done on project and national levels and at the same time there could be a legitimate claim for carrying out international comparative analysis of results. The majority of public administration developments belongs to the scope of e-government. The evidencebased policy making is a component of good governance next to transparency, sustainability, efficiency, integrity and people centricity. Government obligations and responsibilities in evaluations vary from country to country. Digitalization brings new challenges for public service and governments are taking various measures in response to them. Evaluation can fulfil its role in the strategic policy cycle only if it can meet the political conditions with attention to ethical and methodological standards; can adapt to the digitalized circumstances. The paper aims a deeper analysis of evaluation phase, and to summarize the possible new methods reaching better results in public services and public administration services. In this paper we are going to conduct an international comparative analysis with a special attention given to a public administration development program in Hungary.

scholarly journals Notes on Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness and its Measurement

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Eduardo Monaco
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
Poverty Reduction ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Multidimensional Poverty ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Environmental Preservation ◽  
Gross National Happiness ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
National Happiness

Bhutan, a Himalayan landlocked country of just about 750,000 inhabitants, has since the 1980s adopted a unique, holistic approach to development governance commonly referred to as 'Gross National Happiness' (GNH), which aims at achieving equitable socio-economic progress in harmony with other fundamental 'pillars' such as environmental preservation, good governance, and protection of the local cultural identity. The strategy - inspired, above all, by solid Tantric Buddhist belief - significantly differentiates itself from the mainstream GDP-driven, output-maximizing paradigms by maintaining that truly sustainable development can only originate from acknowledging the equal dignity and crucial interdependence of various dimensions of both human and natural life. This paper, drafted in the month of December 2015, briefly analyzes GNH policy’s key tenets and achievements – more conspicuous in regards to democratic governance and environment than in terms of inclusive, multidimensional poverty reduction, as well as its recently devised measuring tool, the GNH Index, and the results of its latest surveys. Factors like the peculiar Buddhist culture that informs it, the relatively simple economic infrastructure at this early stage of development, as well as the limited size of the politically active, urbanized population, all make GNH per se a distinctively Bhutanese phenomenon. Nevertheless, the fundamental paradigm shift that GNH advocates has already resonated beyond the countries’ borders, reinforcing a growing trend across international development actors towards a more comprehensive, qualitative definition and measurement of societal development.

A critical reappraisal of resident participation in China and France: ‘authoritarian deliberation’ goes global?

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia C. Romano
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Urban Renewal ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Resident Participation ◽  
Democratic Regimes ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Local Contexts ◽  
Participative Democracy ◽  
Regime Types ◽  
Policies And Practices

AbstractThis paper, the first step of a project aiming at analysing the establishment of practices of resident participation and consultation in urban renewal in China, proposes a reflection upon these practices through a comparison with similar experiences in France. Identifying some convergences between the practices adopted in the two countries, the paper proposes to reflect upon such puzzling outcomes, provocatively questioning the classic distinction between authoritarian and democratic regimes. It suggests that our analyses and interpretations shall get rid of classical binary categorisations between regime types to embrace a comparative analysis of the policies and practices introduced in various local contexts, and reflect upon their underlying logics. In so doing, the paper engages with He and Warren's concept of ‘authoritarian deliberation’ as well as with the critiques expressed by a number of French scholars on concepts such as ‘participative democracy’ and ‘good governance’. Such a focus on the underlying logics rather than on regime types will show that the concept of ‘authoritarian deliberation’ does not only apply to authoritarian contexts. Rather, it represents a fruitful starting point to analyse and reflect upon instances of participation and deliberation in both democratic and authoritarian countries.

Significance of and Comparative Trends in Procedural Regulation of Right to Information

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 31-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polonca Kovač
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Time Limits ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Rti Implementation ◽  
Right To Information ◽  
Legal Right

Any legal right is (more) efficiently pursued if sufficient procedural regulation supports its substantive setting. This article is dedicated to an analysis of procedural regulation of right to information (RTI) since its significance is increasing in terms of developing good governance and good administration within contemporary transparent, open and collaborative society. The comparative analysis of selected countries (USA, Ireland, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Slovenia, Croatia) included herein proves that selected procedural institutions, such as time limits and an appeal to an independent body or judicial review, contribute to a significantly higher level of implementation of the RTI in practice as also indicated by several international studies. In conclusion, the author recommends certain good practices, especially significance of RTI implementation in relation to different authorities in the context of administrative procedure guaranteeing constitutional and supranational transparency principles.

Comparative Constitutionalism and Good Governance in the Commonwealth: An Eastern and Southern African Perspective

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-243
Author(s):  
Timothy M Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Political Science ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
The Political ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
Comprehensive Index ◽  
African Perspective

Comparative Constitutionalism and Good Governance in the Commonwealth: An Eastern and Southern African Perspective, John Hatchard, Muna Ndulo and Peter Slinn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. xxv, 361This is a magisterial tome in both substance and style. It is comprehensive, almost encyclopaedic; it also presents the perspective of “constitutional lawyers” (4), at least until the “retreat” towards the political science in the concluding, thirteenth chapter (310). Reflective of their trade, the trio of authors include lists of cases, constitutions, statutes and other instruments, with page references, as well as a comprehensive index of almost 20 pages. The volume presents the significant conceptual advances in comparative constitutionalism in anglophone Africa since independence, including democratic pressures towards “good governance” advanced through the Commonwealth nexus (1); but it also comes to lament the continuing existential constraints on “constitutional governance” (308). It offers welcome comparative analysis of a dozen countries and myriad regimes over four decades.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document