Neighborhood perception and self-rated health among Mexican American older adults

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 2559-2564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Stroope ◽  
Isaiah F.A. Cohen ◽  
Joshua C. Tom ◽  
Aaron B. Franzen ◽  
Matthew A. Valasik ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Maayan Sayag ◽  
Gitit Kavé

Abstract Older adults consistently report young subjective age and provide high ratings of their subjective health. The current research examined which social comparisons older adults make when they assess their subjective age and health, as well as the effects of experimentally manipulated social comparisons on these assessments. In Study 1, 146 participants (aged 60 and over) reported to whom they compared themselves when assessing their subjective age or health. In Study 2, 100 participants (aged 60 and over) reported their subjective age and health after receiving feedback that compared them to younger adults or to their peers. Study 1 shows that participants compared themselves primarily to their peer group. Yet, individuals who selected a younger comparison group when assessing subjective age reported a younger subjective age, better self-rated health and more positive expectations regarding ageing relative to those who selected their peers as a comparison group. No equivalent differences emerged in any of the measures when participants were divided by their selection of comparison group after providing their self-rated health ratings. In Study 2, feedback that emphasised the performance of younger people led to reports of younger subjective age relative to feedback that emphasised peer performance, with no equivalent difference for self-rated health. These findings help explain why older adults feel younger and healthier than they actually are. We suggest that older adults use social comparisons as a strategy that protects them from the negative effects of ageing on self-perception.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 404-404
Author(s):  
Joseph Kim ◽  
Kyuree Kim

Abstract The purpose of this study was to identify the profiles of older adults according to lifestyle. Data for the study were from the 2017 Consumption and Activities Mail Survey (CAMS). CAMS 2017 is a questionnaire mailed to a sub-sample of respondents from the Health and Retirement Study. Participants were limited to older adults 65 and older, and the final sample consisted of 1136 older adults. The sample included 443 men and 693 women. Caucasians comprised 82.0% of the participants. Lifestyle was measured through items assessing the amount of time spent on activities. Due to high skewness, the items were dichotomized, 0=no time spent on activity and 1=time spent on the activity. Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to identify groups based on lifestyle. LCA is a person-centered approach for identifying unobserved subgroups based on similarity in responses to items. Three lifestyle groups were identified. Group 1 was “Outgoing” with 471 individuals. Group 2 was “Adequate” with 229 individuals. Group 3 was “Inactive” with 436 individuals. An ANOVA was then conducted to assess mean differences in self-rated health, cognition, depressive symptoms, and loneliness for the three lifestyle groups. The “Outgoing” and “Adequate” groups had significantly higher scores on self-rated health and cognition, and in addition, significantly lower scores on depressive symptoms and loneliness compared to the “Inactive” group. No significant differences were observed between the “Outgoing” and “Adequate” groups. An implication from this study is the importance of maintaining an active lifestyle in later life for better mental health and cognition.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 790-790
Author(s):  
Dori Rosenberg ◽  
Rod Walker ◽  
Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman ◽  
KatieRose Richmire ◽  
John Bellettiere ◽  
...  

Abstract Few epidemiologic studies have examined device-measured sitting patterns by demographics and health status. The Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study is an on-going epidemiologic study of adults age ≥65 years. We conducted a sub-study that added a thigh-worn activPAL device and sleep logs for 7 days to the measurement protocol. A total of 997 had valid wear time (≥4 days with 10-20 hours of data per day) and covariate data. activPAL sedentary pattern measures included number of sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more and mean sitting bout duration. On average, participants (56% female, 57% > age 75, 89% non-Hispanic white) sat in bouts lasting 17 minutes (SD = 12) and had 5.9 (SD = 1.7) bouts of sitting lasting 30 minutes or more. Participants who were older, were male, had obesity, had worse self-rated health, had depression, and had difficulty walking had longer sitting bouts and more prolonged bouts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document