Tracking climate change science and policy: 25 years of public engagement

2014 ◽  
Vol 180 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-273
Author(s):  
David Simon
Futures ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattias Hjerpe ◽  
Björn-Ola Linnér

2020 ◽  
pp. 096366252098172
Author(s):  
Sharon Coen ◽  
Joanne Meredith ◽  
Ruth Woods ◽  
Ana Fernandez

This article explores how readers of UK newspapers construct expertise around climate change. It draws on 300 online readers’ comments on news items in The Guardian, Daily Mail and The Telegraph, concerning the release of the International Panel on Climate Change report calling for immediate action on climate change. Comments were analysed using discursive psychology. We identified a series of discursive strategies that commenters adopted to present themselves as experts in their commentary. The (mostly indirect) use of category entitlements (implicitly claiming themselves as expert) and the presentation of one’s argument as factual (based on direct or indirect technical knowledge or common sense) emerged as common ways in which readers made claims to expertise, both among the supporters and among the sceptics of climate change science. Our findings indicate that expertise is a fluid concept, constructed in diverse ways, with important implications for public engagement with climate change science.


Eos ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Showstack

Holdren said that investing in climate change science and policy measures is good for the economy, national security, and the environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document