scholarly journals Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 3325-3335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Sun ◽  
Josep G. Canadell ◽  
Lijun Yu ◽  
Lingfei Yu ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Crop Yield ◽  
Conservation Agriculture ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Global Soil

scholarly journals Challenges of soil carbon sequestration in NENA Region

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talal Darwish ◽  
Therese Atallah ◽  
Ali Fadel
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Agricultural Practices ◽  
Conservation Agriculture ◽  
Belowground Biomass ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Land Capability ◽  
North East ◽  
Modest Contribution

Abstract. North East North Africa (NENA) region spans over 14 % of the total surface of the Earth and hosts 10 % of its population. Soils of the NENA region are mostly highly vulnerable to degradation, and food security will depend much on sustainable agricultural measures. Weather variability, drought and depleting vegetation are dominant causes of the decline in soil organic carbon (SOC). In this work the situation of SOC was studied, using a land capability model and soil mapping. The land capability model showed that most NENA countries (17 out of 20), suffer from low productive lands (> 80 %). Stocks of SOC were mapped (1 : 5 Million) in topsoils (0–30 cm) and subsoils (30–100 cm). The maps showed that 69 % of soil resources present a stock of SOC below the threshold of 30 t ha−1. The stocks varied between ≈ 10 t ha−1 in shrublands and 60 t ha−1 for evergreen forests. Highest stocks were found in forests, irrigated crops, mixed orchards and saline flooded vegetation. The stocks of SIC were higher than those of SOC. In subsoils, the SIC ranged between 25 and 450 t ha−1, against 20 to 45 t ha−1 for SOC. This paper also highlights the modest contribution of NENA region to global SOC stock in the topsoil not exceeding 4.1 %. The paper also discusses agricultural practices that are favorable to carbon sequestration. Practices of conservation agriculture could be effective, as the presence of soil cover reduces the evaporation, water and wind erosions. Further, the introduction of legumes, as part of a cereal-legume rotation, and the application of nitrogen fertilizers to the cereal, caused a notable increase of SOC after 10 years. The effects of crop rotations on SOC are related to the amounts of above and belowground biomass produced and retained in the system. Some knowledge gaps exist especially in aspects related to the effect of irrigation on SOC, and on SIC at the level of soil profile and soil landscape. Still, major constraints facing soil carbon sequestration are policy relevant and socio-economic in nature, rather than scientific.

Manure and Mineral Fertilizer Effects on Crop Yield and Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Meta‐Analysis and Modeling Across China

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1659-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guiying Jiang ◽  
Wenju Zhang ◽  
Minggang Xu ◽  
Yakov Kuzyakov ◽  
Xubo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Crop Yield ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mineral Fertilizer ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration

Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration: Between Myth and Farmer Reality

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Govaerts∗ ◽  
N. Verhulst∗ ◽  
A. Castellanos-Navarrete ◽  
K. D. Sayre ◽  
J. Dixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Conservation Agriculture ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration

Can conservation agriculture increase soil carbon sequestration? A modelling approach

Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 ◽  
pp. 114298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Valkama ◽  
Gulya Kunypiyaeva ◽  
Rauan Zhapayev ◽  
Muratbek Karabayev ◽  
Erbol Zhusupbekov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Conservation Agriculture ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Modelling Approach

BIOCHAR AS A SOIL AMENDMENT TO IMPROVE CROP YIELD AND SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION

2014 ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.B. Rosenani ◽  
S.H. Ahmad ◽  
S. Nurul Adila ◽  
Tan Wei Loon
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Crop Yield ◽  
Soil Amendment ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration

scholarly journals Conservation agriculture based on diversified and high-performance production system leads to soil carbon sequestration in subtropical environments

2019 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 136-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ruiz Potma Gonçalves ◽  
João Carlos de Moraes Sá ◽  
Umakant Mishra ◽  
Allison José Fornari ◽  
Flávia Juliana Ferreira Furlan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Production System ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Conservation Agriculture ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration

Poverty, risk, and the supply of soil carbon sequestration

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSHUA GRAFF-ZIVIN ◽  
LESLIE LIPPER
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Conservation Agriculture ◽  
Relative Strength ◽  
Soil Carbon Sequestration ◽  
Agricultural Output ◽  
Dynamic Optimization Model ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTWe explore poor farmers' incentives to adopt production systems that increase soil carbon sequestration, focusing on the impact of risk. A dynamic optimization model of conservation agriculture adoption is presented, where farmers optimize over expected utility of profits from agriculture and carbon sequestration. Adoption impacts on agricultural productivity are modeled as a combination of the technological effects of the new system, and productivity effects of changes in soil carbon on agricultural output. Comparative static results indicate increases in soil carbon sequestration price and the discount rate have unambiguous impacts on equilibrium soil carbon levels; the former leading to higher, and the latter to lower, carbon levels. Increases in the price of agricultural output and risk aversion have ambiguous impacts, depending on the relative strength of the productivity and technology effects. The paper concludes with a discussion of designing soil carbon payment mechanisms to benefit low income farmers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document