An Interpretive Argument for Blended Course Design

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 588-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Gleason
Keyword(s):  
Course Design ◽  
Blended Course ◽  
Interpretive Argument

A Process for Blended Course Design

2020 ◽  
pp. 59-70
Author(s):  
Jared Stein ◽  
Charles R. Graham
Keyword(s):  
Course Design ◽  
Blended Course

Blended Course Design

2015 ◽  
pp. 488-512
Author(s):  
Patricia McGee
Keyword(s):  
Course Design ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Pedagogical Strategies ◽  
Effective Strategies ◽  
Classroom Activities ◽  
Interpretive Analysis ◽  
Blended Courses ◽  
Education Coursework ◽  
Hybrid Course Design ◽  
Blended Course

Blended or hybrid course design is generally considered to involve a combination of online and classroom activities. However defining blended courses solely based on delivery mode suggests there is nothing more to a blended course than where students meet and how they use technology. Ultimately there is a risk that blended courses defined in this way will not utilize effective strategies that have proven to improve learning for students. This study investigates pedagogical strategies or designs that have reported success in higher education coursework as published in articles that address blended pedagogy. A qualitative meta-interpretive analysis identified eight themes: definitions of blended design, meetings for the learner, online priority, technology with a purpose, focused e-interactions, active learning, distribution of time, pedagogical chunking, and outliers and omissions.

Conversation Design in the Electronic Discussion Age

2008 ◽  
pp. 91-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory MacKinnon
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Collaborative Inquiry ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Blended Courses ◽  
Inquiry Approach ◽  
Conversation Theory ◽  
Blended Course

The goal of the chapter to examine a way in which Pask’ s conversation theory (CT) can be used as a theoretical framework for designing blended courses using a collaborative inquiry approach for teaching and learning in campus-based university. This chapter comprises three parts that explains a) the constructs of CT, and their relations in regard to online collaborative inquiry, b) the four principles derived from the constructs of CT and the possible use of these principles to design a blended course, and c) how the effects of these constructs can be used to assess the effectiveness of this CT based blended course design. This chapter is concluded with the discussion and implications for course design, and future research on CT.

The Meaning of Quality in Online/Blended Courses to American and Malaysian Administrators, Faculty, and Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-58
Author(s):  
Esther Smidt ◽  
Cecilia Yin Mei Cheong ◽  
Emily Dachroeden ◽  
Timothy Kochem
Keyword(s):  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Research Question ◽  
The United States ◽  
Public University ◽  
Online Course ◽  
Blended Courses ◽  
Blended Course ◽  
Quality Features

This article compares two studies, investigating administrator, faculty, and student perceptions of quality in online/blended courses conducted in two different contexts, namely (1) two midsize public universities in the United States, and (2) a college in a public university in Malaysia. The research question explored in both studies was: What is the meaning of “quality” in an online/blended course to administrators, faculty, and students? Survey data from the three constituents in both contexts were obtained. Qualitative data analysis revealed the top 7-8 quality features of each context as ranked by number of references. The results revealed similarities and differences in the rankings of the quality features between constituents and between contexts. Similarities suggested that different constituents had different priorities with regards to quality features while differences appeared to be based on where each institution was on their distance education trajectory. These findings should be considered and reflected on in online course design, teaching strategies, and student support.

Blended Course Design: A Synthesis of Best Practices

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia McGee ◽  
Abby Reis
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Practices ◽  
Technology Utilization ◽  
Pedagogical Strategies ◽  
Hybrid Course ◽  
Online Technology ◽  
Assessment Strategies ◽  
Blended Course

Blended or hybrid course offerings in higher education are commonplace and much has been written about how to design a blended course effectively. This study examines publicly available guides, documents, and books that espouse best or effective practices in blended course design to determine commonalities among such practices. A qualitative meta-analysis reveals common principles regarding blended definitions, the design process, pedagogical strategies, classroom and online technology utilization, assessment strategies, and course implementation and student readiness. Findings reveal areas of disconnect and conflict, as well as implications for the likelihood of successful utilization when best/effective practices are followed.

Instructional Design for Class-Based and Computer-Mediated Learning

2009 ◽  
pp. 244-264
Author(s):  
Richard Walker ◽  
Walter Baets
Keyword(s):  
Blended Learning ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Net Generation ◽  
Mediated Learning ◽  
Instructional Approach ◽  
Working Definition ◽  
Computer Mediated ◽  
Student Centred Learning ◽  
Blended Course

Blended learning occupies a prominent place within higher education teaching strategies, yet there is no clear definition for what we mean by this term as an instructional approach. In this chapter, we present a working definition for blended learning that is based around a learner-centred framework, and outline three instructional models for blended course design in support of student-centred learning. We have applied these models to a series of course experiments that were undertaken at two international business schools: Nyenrode Business University (The Netherlands) and Euromed Marseille École de Management (France). Common to each course design was the use of e-tools to solicit and share knowledge for the out-of-class phase of student learning. We discuss the reception of these models by students and their relevance to Net Generation learners in promoting socially active learning through collaboration and experience sharing. Drawing together the lessons learned from these experiments, we present an instructional framework for course designers, focusing on the key phases in the delivery of a blended course and the accompanying instructional responsibilities that underpin this instructional approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document