Investigation of residual stresses in a repair-welded rail head considering solid-state phase transformation

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1059-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
H-K Jun ◽  
D-W Kim ◽  
I-S Jeon ◽  
S-H Lee ◽  
Y-S Chang
Author(s):  
Mike C. Smith ◽  
Steve Bate ◽  
P. John Bouchard

Finite element methods are used increasingly to predict weld residual stresses. This is a relatively complex use of the finite element method, and it is important that its practitioners are able to demonstrate their ability to produce accurate predictions. Extensively characterised benchmark problems are a vital tool in achieving this. However, existing benchmarks are relatively complex and not suitable for analysis by novice weld modellers. This paper describes two benchmarks based upon a simple beam specimen with a single autogenous weld bead laid along its top edge. This geometry may be analysed using either 3D or 2D FE models and employing either block-dumped or moving heat source techniques. The first, simpler, benchmark is manufactured from AISI 316 steel, which does not undergo solid state phase transformation, while the second, more complex, benchmark is manufactured from SA508 Cl 3 steel, which undergoes solid state phase transformation during welding. A number of such beams were manufactured using an automated TIG process, and instrumented with thermocouples and strain gauges to record the transient temperature and strain response during welding. The resulting residual stresses were measured using diverse techniques, and showed markedly different distributions in the austenitic and ferritic beams. The paper presents the information necessary to perform and validate finite element weld residual stress simulations in both the simple austenitic beam and the more complex ferritic beam, and provides performance measures for the austenitic beam problem.


2019 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 173-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiamin Sun ◽  
Jonas Hensel ◽  
Jakob Klassen ◽  
Thomas Nitschke-Pagel ◽  
Klaus Dilger

Author(s):  
A H Yaghi ◽  
T H Hyde ◽  
A A Becker ◽  
W Sun

The methodology of numerically simulating residual stresses in a welded P91 pipe section is described. The finite element (FE) method has been applied to simulate residual axial and hoop stresses generated in the weld region and heat affected zone (HAZ) of an axisymmetric 50-bead circumferentially butt-welded P91 steel pipe, with outer diameter of 145 mm and wall thickness of 50mm. The FE simulation consists of a thermal analysis which is followed by a sequentially-coupled structural analysis. Solid-state phase transformation (SSPT), which is characteristic of P91 steel during welding thermal cycles, has been modelled in the FE analysis by allowing for volumetric changes in steel and associated changes in yield stress due to austenitic and martensitic transformations. Phase transformation plasticity has also been taken into account. Preheat and interpass temperature control has been included in the modelling process. Thermally-obtained temperature contours indicate the size of the weld region, parent metal penetration, and HAZ. Residual axial and hoop stresses have been depicted through the pipe wall thickness as well as along the outer surface of the pipe. The results indicate the importance of including SSPT in the simulation of stresses during the welding of P91 steel.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Massih ◽  
Lars O. Jernkvist

AbstractWe present a kinetic model for solid state phase transformation ($$\alpha \rightleftharpoons \beta$$ α ⇌ β ) of common zirconium alloys used as fuel cladding material in light water reactors. The model computes the relative amounts of $$\beta$$ β or $$\alpha$$ α phase fraction as a function of time or temperature in the alloys. The model accounts for the influence of excess oxygen (due to oxidation) and hydrogen concentration (due to hydrogen pickup) on phase transformation kinetics. Two variants of the model denoted by A and B are presented. Model A is suitable for simulation of laboratory experiments in which the heating/cooling rate is constant and is prescribed. Model B is more generic. We compare the results of our model computations, for both A and B variants, with accessible experimental data reported in the literature covering heating/cooling rates of up to 100 K/s. The results of our comparison are satisfactory, especially for model A. Our model B is intended for implementation in fuel rod behavior computer programs, applicable to a reactor accident situation, in which the Zr-based fuel cladding may go through $$\alpha \rightleftharpoons \beta$$ α ⇌ β phase transformation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document