Publication and outcome reporting of homeopathy trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth T Thomas ◽  
Justin Clark ◽  
Paul Glasziou
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Reporting

Selective outcome reporting in root coverage randomized clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Isaac Sendyk ◽  
Nathalia Vilela Souza ◽  
João Batista César Neto ◽  
Dimitris N. Tatakis ◽  
Cláudio Mendes Pannuti
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Selective Outcome Reporting ◽  
Outcome Reporting

scholarly journals Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2803
Author(s):  
Evridiki Asimakidou ◽  
Pablo Alvarez Abut ◽  
Andreas Raabe ◽  
Kathleen Seidel
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Critical Duration ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Warning Sign ◽  
Outcome Reporting ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Warning Criteria

During intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP), heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, intraoperative settings, applied warning criteria, and outcome reporting exists. A scoping review of MEP warning criteria in supratentorial surgery was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Sixty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most commonly used alarm criteria were MEP signal loss, which was always a major warning sign, followed by amplitude reduction and threshold elevation. Irreversible MEP alterations were associated with a higher number of transient and persisting motor deficits compared with the reversible changes. In almost all studies, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were high, while in most of them, sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) were rather low or modest. Thus, the absence of an irreversible alteration may reassure the neurosurgeon that the patient will not suffer a motor deficit in the short-term and long-term follow-up. Further, MEPs perform well as surrogate markers, and reversible MEP deteriorations after successful intervention indicate motor function preservation postoperatively. However, in future studies, a consensus regarding the definitions of MEP alteration, critical duration of alterations, and outcome reporting should be determined.

scholarly journals Effects of selective outcome reporting on risk perception

2021 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 110821
Author(s):  
F. Freudenstein ◽  
R.J. Croft ◽  
S.P. Loughran ◽  
B.M. Zeleke ◽  
P.M. Wiedemann
Keyword(s):  
Risk Perception ◽  
Selective Outcome Reporting ◽  
Outcome Reporting

Outcome reporting following navigated high tibial osteotomy of the knee: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 3529-3555 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Yan ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
Jeffrey Kay ◽  
Moin Khan ◽  
Nicole Simunovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
High Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Tibial Osteotomy ◽  
Outcome Reporting

Challenges of Multidimensional Outcome Reporting after Suburethral Mid Urethral Sling Removal

2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (6) ◽  
pp. 1577-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabeel A. Shakir ◽  
Connie Wang ◽  
Nirmish Singla ◽  
Feras Alhalabi ◽  
Alana Christie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Reporting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document