Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development

Evolution ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick T. Rohner ◽  
Wolf U. Blanckenhorn ◽  
Nalini Puniamoorthy
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Size ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Development

scholarly journals Selection for increased male size predicts variation in sexual size dimorphism among fish species

2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1918) ◽  
pp. 20192640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis R. Horne ◽  
Andrew G. Hirst ◽  
David Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Fish Species ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Male Competition ◽  
Energy Output ◽  
Female Size ◽  
Male Size ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Fecundity Selection ◽  
Selection For

Variation in the degree of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) among taxa is generally considered to arise from differences in the relative intensity of male–male competition and fecundity selection. One might predict, therefore, that SSD will vary systematically with (1) the intensity of sexual selection for increased male size, and (2) the intensity of fecundity selection for increased female size. To test these two fundamental hypotheses, we conducted a phylogenetic comparative analysis of SSD in fish. Specifically, using records of body length at first sexual maturity from FishBase, we quantified variation in the magnitude and direction of SSD in more than 600 diverse freshwater and marine fish species, from sticklebacks to sharks. Although female-biased SSD was common, and thought to be driven primarily by fecundity selection, variation in SSD was not dependent on either the allometric scaling of reproductive energy output or fecundity in female fish. Instead, systematic patterns based on habitat and life-history characteristics associated with varying degrees of male–male competition and paternal care strongly suggest that adaptive variation in SSD is driven by the intensity of sexual selection for increased male size.

Latitudinal clines in sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism, and sex‐specific genetic dispersal during a poleward range expansion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael Y. Dudaniec ◽  
Alexander R. Carey ◽  
Erik I. Svensson ◽  
Bengt Hansson ◽  
Chuan Ji Yong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Range Expansion ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Latitudinal Clines

scholarly journals Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in animals

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 20210251
Author(s):  
Tim Janicke ◽  
Salomé Fromonteil
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sex Difference ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Bateman Gradient ◽  
Mixed Support ◽  
Evolutionary Force ◽  
Length Measurements

Sexual selection is often considered as a critical evolutionary force promoting sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in animals. However, empirical evidence for a positive relationship between sexual selection on males and male-biased SSD received mixed support depending on the studied taxonomic group and on the method used to quantify sexual selection. Here, we present a meta-analytic approach accounting for phylogenetic non-independence to test how standardized metrics of the opportunity and strength of pre-copulatory sexual selection relate to SSD across a broad range of animal taxa comprising up to 95 effect sizes from 59 species. We found that SSD based on length measurements was correlated with the sex difference in the opportunity for sexual selection but showed a weak and statistically non-significant relationship with the sex difference in the Bateman gradient. These findings suggest that pre-copulatory sexual selection plays a limited role for the evolution of SSD in a broad phylogenetic context.

scholarly journals Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism

2007 ◽  
Vol 274 (1628) ◽  
pp. 2971-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Dale ◽  
Peter O Dunn ◽  
Jordi Figuerola ◽  
Terje Lislevand ◽  
Tamás Székely ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Confounding Factors ◽  
Allometric Relationship ◽  
Rensch’S Rule ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Rensch's Rule ◽  
Clear Solution ◽  
General Explanation

In 1950, Rensch first described that in groups of related species, sexual size dimorphism is more pronounced in larger species. This widespread and fundamental allometric relationship is now commonly referred to as ‘Rensch's rule’. However, despite numerous recent studies, we still do not have a general explanation for this allometry. Here we report that patterns of allometry in over 5300 bird species demonstrate that Rensch's rule is driven by a correlated evolutionary change in females to directional sexual selection on males. First, in detailed multivariate analysis, the strength of sexual selection was, by far, the strongest predictor of allometry. This was found to be the case even after controlling for numerous potential confounding factors, such as overall size, degree of ornamentation, phylogenetic history and the range and degree of size dimorphism. Second, in groups where sexual selection is stronger in females, allometry consistently goes in the opposite direction to Rensch's rule. Taken together, these results provide the first clear solution to the long-standing evolutionary problem of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: sexual selection causes size dimorphism to correlate with species size.

Sexual Size Dimorphism and Survival of Male and Female Blackbirds (Icteridae)

The Auk ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Searcy ◽  
Ken Yasukawa
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Female Size ◽  
Male Size ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Large Size ◽  
Survival Selection ◽  
Female Survival ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
Dimorphic Species

Abstract In a between-species comparison of icterids, male survival decreases relative to female survival as the degree of sexual size dimorphism increases. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that male size is limited by survival selection in icterids; the degree of size dimorphism is known to correlate with the degree of polygyny in icterids, however, so the decreased relative survival of males in dimorphic species may be caused by some correlate of polygyny other than large size. Survival estimates based on records of recovery of dead birds show positive correlations between male size and male survival and between female size and female survival, but survival estimates based on recaptures of live birds fail to show such relationships.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document