scholarly journals SEXUALLY SELECTED TRAITS EVOLVE POSITIVE ALLOMETRY WHEN SOME MATINGS OCCUR IRRESPECTIVE OF THE TRAIT

Evolution ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1332-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lutz Fromhage ◽  
Hanna Kokko
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 1290-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Lucas Rodríguez ◽  
William G Eberhard

AbstractSexually-selected traits often show positive static allometry, with large individuals bearing disproportionately large structures. But many other sexually-selected traits show isometry or even negative allometry, with trait size varying relatively little with body size. We recently proposed that the functions of these traits (as aggressive signals, weapons, courtship signals, and contact courtship devices) determine their allometries. Positive allometry is generally favored for aggressive signals because aggressive signals are selected to emphasize body size (and thus fighting prowess). In contrast, the biomechanics of force application in weapons only sometimes select for positive allometry; the content of courtship signals is even less often related to body size; and contact courtship devices are selected to be relatively invariant across body sizes. Here we summarize the arguments in favor of this “functional allometry” hypothesis and expand a comparative test of its predictions. Our results indicate that sexual traits have the allometric slopes predicted by our hypothesis, regardless of which body part bears the structure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104413
Author(s):  
Susan M. Bertram ◽  
Danya D. Yaremchuk ◽  
Mykell L. Reifer ◽  
Amy Villareal ◽  
Matthew J. Muzzatti ◽  
...  

ILAR Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 253-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Jasarevic ◽  
D. C. Geary ◽  
C. S. Rosenfeld

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 432-439
Author(s):  
Jennifer K Hellmann ◽  
Kelly A Stiver ◽  
Susan Marsh-Rollo ◽  
Suzanne H Alonzo

Abstract Male–male competition is a well-known driver of reproductive success and sexually selected traits in many species. However, in some species, males work together to court females or defend territories against male competitors. Dominant (nesting) males sire most offspring, but subordinate (satellite) males are better able to obtain fertilizations relative to unpartnered males. Because satellites only gain reproductive success by sneaking, there has been much interest in identifying the mechanisms enforcing satellite cooperation (defense) and reducing satellite sneaking. One such potential mechanism is outside competition: unpartnered satellites can destabilize established male partnerships and may force partnered satellites to restrain from cheating to prevent the dominant male from replacing them with an unpartnered satellite. Here, we manipulated perceived competition in the Mediterranean fish Symphodus ocellatus by presenting an “intruding” satellite male to established nesting and satellite male pairs. Focal satellite aggression to the intruder was higher when focal satellites were less cooperative, suggesting that satellites increase aggression to outside competitors when their social position is less stable. In contrast, nesting male aggression to the intruder satellite increased as spawning activity increased, suggesting that nesting males increase their defense toward outside competitors when their current relationship is productive. We found no evidence of altered spawning activity or nesting/satellite male interactions before and after the presentation. These results collectively suggest that response to outside competition is directly linked to behavioral dynamics between unrelated male partners and may be linked to conflict and cooperation in ways that are similar to group-living species.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yû Suzaki ◽  
Masako Katsuki ◽  
Takahisa Miyatake ◽  
Yasukazu Okada

Ecotoxicology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1138-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Spickler ◽  
John P. Swaddle ◽  
Rebecca L. Gilson ◽  
Claire W. Varian-Ramos ◽  
Daniel A. Cristol

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document