scholarly journals STRONG ASSORTATIVE MATING BY DIET, COLOR, SIZE, AND MORPHOLOGY BUT LIMITED PROGRESS TOWARD SYMPATRIC SPECIATION IN A CLASSIC EXAMPLE: CAMEROON CRATER LAKE CICHLIDS

Evolution ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (7) ◽  
pp. 2114-2123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Martin
Nature ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 439 (7077) ◽  
pp. 719-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Barluenga ◽  
Kai N. Stölting ◽  
Walter Salzburger ◽  
Moritz Muschick ◽  
Axel Meyer

Nature ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 368 (6472) ◽  
pp. 629-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich K. Schliewen ◽  
Diethard Tautz ◽  
Svante Pääbo

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel I. Bolnick

Numerous theoretical models suggest that sympatric speciation is possible when frequency-dependent interactions such as intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection on a trait that is also subject to assortative mating. Here, I review recent evidence that both conditions are met in lake populations of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Nonetheless, sympatric speciation appears to be rare or absent in stickleback. If stickleback qualitatively fit the theoretical requirements for sympatric speciation, why do they not undergo sympatric speciation? I present simulations showing that disruptive selection and assortative mating in stickleback, though present, are too weak to drive speciation. Furthermore, I summarize empirical evidence that disruptive selection in stickleback drives other forms of evolutionary diversification (plasticity, increased trait variance, and sexual dimorphism) instead of speciation. In conclusion, core assumptions of sympatric speciation theory seem to be qualitatively reasonable for stickleback, but speciation may nevertheless fail because of (i) quantitative mismatches with theory and (ii) alternative evolutionary outcomes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 258 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiano Ribeiro ◽  
Nestor Caticha

Evolution ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1406-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Martin ◽  
Joseph S. Cutler ◽  
John P. Friel ◽  
Cyrille Dening Touokong ◽  
Graham Coop ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Johnson ◽  
F. C. Hoppensteadt ◽  
James J. Smith ◽  
Guy L. Bush

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie J. Richards ◽  
Jelmer W. Poelstra ◽  
Christopher H. Martin

AbstractGenomic data has revealed complex histories of colonization and repeated gene flow previously unrecognized in some of the most celebrated examples of sympatric speciation and radiation. However, much of the evidence for secondary gene flow into these radiations comes from genome-wide tests, which tells us little about how gene flow potentially influenced sympatric diversification. Here we investigated whole genomes of Barombi Mbo crater lake cichlids for fine-scale patterns of introgression between species with neighboring riverine cichlid populations. We did find evidence of secondary gene flow into the radiation scattered across < 0.24% of the genome; however, the functional and genetic diversity in these regions paint no clear picture of how that variation could have contributed to the ecological and morphological diversity found in the lake. Our results suggest that either variation in novel genetic pathways introduced during secondary gene flow contributed to the radiation, or that secondary gene flow was predominantly neutral with respect to the diversification processes. We also found evidence for differential assortment of ancestral polymorphism found in riverine populations between sympatric sister species, suggesting the presence of a hybrid swarm in the past. While the history of gene flow and colonization appears to be more complicated than once thought, the lack of compelling evidence for secondary gene flow influencing diversification suggests that we should not yet rule out one of the most celebrated examples of sympatric speciation in nature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document